Search
新片：戚風蛋糕（下集）為何總是凹陷？七個小技巧分享
影片：https://youtu.be/7Q4474zHLgY
文字：https://bit.ly/3fv4Bbj
有很多次做戚風蛋糕都做到氣餒。
從前以為是舊居的焗爐不夠熱，來到了馬來西亞，想用這裏的食材班蘭葉做一個有名的斑蘭蛋糕，可是並不是想像中般容易。
結果我焗了六個，終於算是滿意了。
這次真的試了很多和看了很多資料，所以記錄一下和大家分享，特別是一些可能會比較少留意到的而重要的技巧。
由於資料太多我選擇了用旁述，用了廣東話而配了中文和英文字幕，（廣東話是很有趣的語言），希望將我知道的和大家分享。
你們都喜歡吃戚風蛋糕嗎？希望這個影片可以幫助大家，就算是新手也可以做到好吃的蛋糕。
希望大家喜歡這個影片吧，如果有什麼想法可以告訴我喔。
參考資料：
1. YouTube頻道：Rosa厨房研究报告
2. https://bakerpedia.com/processes/chiffon-cake/
＃一起讀英文同學募集中
＃找外籍老師一起上課
大家知道我最近在讀英文，雖然沒有什麼特定的目的，但是備用著，或許有一天就用得著，加上沒有目的的學習本身就是一件蠻開心、蠻紓壓的事。
而阿富律師這一兩年跟著一位加拿大籍英文老師Erik也一天一小時讀了不少英文文章，聽、說能力都進步了不少。
我最近有一個想法，想找我們的英文老師Erik來開個機動型的英文課，帶著大家讀英文文章或新聞，讓想學英文或維持一點英文基礎的人一起來上課。
以下是我的想法：
頻率～初期先從每週一天開始。
時間～每週一或二的10:00輪流。
時長～1小時讀英文＋半小時聯誼。
費用～估計300元/次/人當次繳交（含學費、場地、茶水）
報名方式～加入LINE群組每週自由報名，不會有壓力，不用浪費錢
地點：捷運台北橋站旁
教學方式：加拿大籍老師用英文上課讀英文新聞（放心，他中文也很好）
適合：英文要好不壞或想來開心學習的朋友們
有興趣、或有問題、或有建議，歡迎留言或私訊我喔！
來分享我今天讀的英文文章：
Sales Processes Research 2020 – Something Old, Something New
2020的銷售研究～有些舊，有些新
Despite the huge growth in marketing and sales automation, along with the growing popularity and acceptance of self-service sales processes, reports of the death of the salesperson are greatly exaggerated, to paraphrase Mark Twain.
儘管市場營銷和銷售自動化的巨大發展，以及自助服務銷售流程的日益普及和接受，但馬克·吐溫的說法卻誇大了推銷員去世的報導。
Along with 隨著
growing popularity 日益普及
self-service 自助
exaggerated 誇張的；誇大的
paraphrase 釋義
Growth 發展；發育；發達；演化
Despite 儘管 in spite of
Automation 自動化
Higher value B2B sales still need a competent salesperson to close the deal. But how have the processes and techniques of salespeople changed in the modern world?
更高價值的B2B銷售仍然需要有能力的銷售人員來完成交易。 但是，在現代，銷售人員的流程和技術如何發生變化？
Competent 能幹的；得力的；可以勝任的
原文出處：
https://www.saleshacker.com/sales-processes-research/
各位，生成器也許已沒有用了。選管會一天就收到4500封電郵。看來，大家炸他電郵還是有點用的。
以下乃沈大師言為「內部AO提供範本」。的確是官話文章，請先仔細閱讀，才選擇是否發出電郵吧。
你還有5小時。
请广传，好人一生平安。
[#官方資訊] 早前分享了一位高級政務官朋友就《逃犯條例》爭議的感受，得到數千轉載，迴響十分熱烈，也有不少公務員私訊回應。本頁對象一直以黃藍以外的專業人士為主，雖然平日只分享國際視野資訊，但在關鍵時刻，也希望為一些平日對社會抽離的朋友，提供更多資訊參考。以下是我的另一位AO朋友擔心局勢惡化，希望以自己的方式真正為特區政府服務，因此以私人身份草擬的意見書，回應特區政府選舉管理委員會關於區議會選舉的官方諮詢，並使用了完美官僚理據、格式和文法，就DQ候選人提供了詳細意見。根據官方資訊，《逃犯條例》收到4500份意見書，其中3000份「贊成」，因此發出意見書並非毫無價值。這位AO表示，大家可以直接使用這格式，根據個人觀點加減內容直接電郵遞交，因為香港人大家都忙，這過程只需一分鐘，應該最符合成本效益。截止日期是7月10日或之前，請廣傳，好人一生平安。
10 July 2019
Chairman
Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC)
By Email: eacenq@eac.hk
Dear Chairman,
Public consultation on District Council Election proposed guidelines
I write to object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines, as it gives Government an unjust, unfair, and unchecked power to disqualify any candidate during the nomination period by reason of Government’s own political motives.
Chapter 3.1 of the Proposed Guidelines says that : “Under the law, the validity of a candidate’s nomination is to be determined by the Returning Officer (RO). The EAC is neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO”.
Chapter 3.9(b) of the Proposed Guidelines describes the requirement by which a candidate must declare (through signing a “Confirmation Form” by the EAC) that he would uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR.
It is totally unclear whether a Confirmation Form duly signed by a candidate is itself sufficient to discharge the candidate’s duty to declare his willingness to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR when he is elected to the office.
Previous elections showed that an RO, who was a civil servant (pitched at Administrative Officer Staff Grade C / District Officer) appointed to the role of RO prior to the election, could make subjective and arbitrary judgment about a candidate’s state of mind and political orientation, with selective reference to some or a few past writings, speeches, statements, expression of opinions, posts in social media platforms in relation to the candidate, instead of merely looking at a Confirmation Form duly signed.
I find it outrageous to see that Ms. Anne Teng, then District Officer (Eastern) appointed to the role of RO in a legislative council by-election last year, could refuse to acknowledge a confirmation form signed by Miss Agnes Chow Ting and disqualify her, citing absurd and arbitrary reasons with reference to some of Miss Chow’s previous remarks or those of her political party, and without giving Miss Chow a fair opportunity to respond to those reasons uttered unreasonably by the RO.
The Proposed Guidelines shows that the EAC has failed its duty to introduce any additional safeguard or measures to plug this unreasonable, unlawful and unconstitutional loophole, which may still be freely exploited by any RO in the next election driven by bad faith and political motive.
It is unacceptable that the EAC could confess that it is “neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO” (Chapter 3.1). I question how the EAC can still “ensure that an election is conducted openly, fairly and honestly at all times” – its statutory duty enshrined in the Electoral Affairs Commission Ordinance - when it is not involved in scrutinising or monitoring the exercise of an RO’s power in disqualifying any candidate at the RO’s own political preference.
The Guidelines did not describe in detail how an RO could, on his or her own, research during the short nomination period the political belief and past sayings of any candidate. The Guidelines are also silent as to whether the RO would have received biased or secret advice from any agency such as Department of Justice, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Home Affairs Department, Information Services Department, etc., which may have compiled a detailed recollection of a candidate’s previous remarks in advance. It was suggested by some that such a compilation of speech or opinion records prepared by any agency other than the RO could have assisted the RO unlawfully in reaching a dangerous disqualification decision to deprive a candidate of the right to stand for the election.
I must remind the EAC that the right to stand for election is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights. The United Nations Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 25 also states that “political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand for election.”
I am disappointed to see that the proposed Guidelines have not offered anything substantive to protect a candidate from the RO’s unlawful interference in the election by disqualifying candidates he or she dislikes. The EAC must look at this carefully to see what it can do.
The current remedy about determining the lawfulness of an RO’s disqualification decision through an election petition to be adjudicated later by the court one or two years after the actual election is totally unsatisfactory, with the lapse of time which delays the timely delivery of a just outcome.
I stress that I object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines in its entirety. I urge you to review all the processes described in Chapter 3 again and independently. In so doing, you must resist all political considerations wrongly dictated by the Chief Executive, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Department of Justice, or other government agency seeking to disturb the fairness and integrity of the forthcoming district council election.
Yours sincerely,
XXXX
更新：有熱心網友翻譯為中文版，並對原文作出修訂，請隨便share／修改：
10 July 2019
選舉管理委員會主席 鈞啓
選舉管理委員會主席鈞鑒： 關於區議會選舉活動建議指引公眾諮詢事宜
本人謹致函對建議指引第三章表達反對意見。建議指引第三章將賦予政府不公平、不公正以及不被箝制的權力，容許政府於提名階段取消香港市民的參選資格，以迎合政府自身的政治目的。
建議指引第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」
建議指引第三章3.9(b) 要求候選人透過簽署選管會擬備的確認書表明他／她擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠。
至於候選人是否能夠簽署確認書就能滿足擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠的要求，建議指引對此完全沒有清晰交代。
過往選舉顯示，首長級丙級政務官／民政事務專員級別的公務員於選舉前獲委任為選舉主任，便能夠就候選人的思緒及政治取向作出主觀且隨意獨斷的決定，並只需揀選候選人往日曾經發表的文章、言論、宣言、意見表達、社交媒體帖文以及社交媒體專頁發佈關於對候選人的帖文穿鑿附會，當作輔證，而非僅以候選人是否有簽署確認書為單獨基礎作判斷。
去年立法會補選，時任東區民政事務專員鄧如欣獲委任為選舉主任，居然拒絕周庭小姐簽署的確認書，以周庭小姐及其所屬政黨昔日的言論去佐證選舉主任荒唐的理由，去褫奪周庭小姐的參選資格，並且沒有給予周庭小姐公平機會回應選舉主任的無理指控，實在令人憤慨。
由建議指引可見，選舉管理委員會並無引入任何措施或保障，去堵塞上述不合理、不合法、不合憲的漏洞。今後選舉主任依然可以使用此漏洞，依據其個人的政治目的或理念，惡意褫奪任何香港市民的參選資格。
選舉管理委員會於第三章第一部分（3.1）指：「根據法例，候選人的提名是否有效 ，完全是由選舉主任作出決定，選管會無權並一向沒有參與， 亦不會給予任何意見。」此點完全不可接受。當選舉管理委員會對選舉主任按其個人政治取向褫奪候選人參選資格的權力不作任何箝制、監察或審查， 又能如何履行其法定職責，「確保在香港舉行的選舉是以公開、公平和誠實的方式進行」呢？
建議指引並無對選舉主任如何可於短促的提名期內研究並審查任何候選人的政治理念及昔日言論有任何著墨。 建議指引亦未有論及選舉主任會否收到其他機構的秘密意見或者偏頗意見。上述的其他機構，例如律政司、內地及政制事務局、民政事務總署或政府新聞處等，可能預先詳細記錄相關候選人的昔日言論。據悉，上述由第三方準備的詳細記錄可能不合法地導致選舉主任作出褫奪候選人選舉資格的危險決定。
本人必須提醒選舉管理委員會，被選舉權是獲香港基本法及香港人權法案保障的基本權利。聯合國人權事務委員會第25號一般性意見亦指出：「不得以政治見解為由剝奪任何人參加競選的權利。」
本人對建議指引並未就保障候選人不被選舉主任按其個人喜惡褫奪資格，防止選舉主任非法干預選舉採取任何措施深感失望。選舉管理委員會必須詳細檢視自己對上述問題有何解決方法。
就選舉主任褫奪參選資格的合法性，目前透過選舉呈請，並於選舉完結一兩年後由法庭裁決的安排實在強差人意。當中所耗的時間令公義遲來。
本人對建議指引第三章完全反對。本人懇求主席重新並獨立審視第三章所包含的所有程序。在重新審視的時候，懇請閣下撇除並抗拒所有政治考量，尤其是來自行政長官、政制及事務內地局、律政司及其他政府機構企圖干預未來區議會選舉的誠信和公平性的政治考量。
敬祝 鈞安 XXXXXXXX 敬上
2019年7月9日
班蘭蛋糕做法：https://youtu.be/GvNJpOXYmYI
班蘭精華做法：https://youtu.be/prfK2Kh_awc
有很多次做戚風蛋糕都做到氣餒。
結果我焗了六個，終於算是滿意了。
這次真的試了很多和看了很多資料，所以記錄一下和大家分享，特別是一些可能會比較少留意到的而重要的技巧。
由於資料太多我選擇了用旁述，用了廣東話而配了中文和英文字幕，（廣東話是很有趣的語言），希望將我知道的和大家分享。
你們都喜歡吃戚風蛋糕嗎？希望這個影片可以幫助大家，就算是新手也可以做到好吃的蛋糕。
希望大家喜歡這個影片吧，如果有什麼想法可以告訴我喔。
參考資料：
1. YouTube頻道：Rosa厨房研究报告
2. https://bakerpedia.com/processes/chiffon-cake/
_____________________________________________________
SOCIAL MEDIA
Instagram：https://www.instagram.com/eatathomehk/
Facebook：https://www.facebook.com/eatathomehk/
Blog：http://www.eatathome.hk/
MY GEAR
影片拍攝 Filming:
Camera/ Sony α7RII
Lens/ Sony Zeiss FE 24-70 f/4
Tripod/ 190XPRO Aluminium 4-Section Camera Tripod
Editing / iMovie
相片拍攝 Photography:
Camera/ Nikon D700
Lens/ Nikon 105mm f/2.8 micro
MUSIC
https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/sa2922/
2019年5月17日，台灣成為全亞洲第一個同性結婚合法的國家。早上下大雨的天空在立法院投票後突然變成美麗的晴天讓大家穿在身上的彩虹出來陪天空的真正的彩虹🌈
台灣一直都是很先進的國家，而且那天也成為全亞洲第一個有同性結婚法律的國家 同時也成為亞洲裡更特別的寶物
我這個外國人那天在立法院外面的現場跟著大群支持者支持這個權利。現場的氣氛那麼特別我非跟全球分享不可。
我想恭喜全部度過這個很長的一條路的人，也跟大家分享我的故事
兩年前台灣司法院出來說同性戀應該也要有權利結婚不過因為台灣法律的程序，有兩年的時間來修法律不然會自動執行
大家好～ 我是Brian，一個來自美國，住在台灣的台北的外國人。我住台灣快10年，學中文快15年。歡迎來到Brian愛台灣～
❤️🧡💛💚💙💜
On May 17, 2019, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to make gay marriage legal! What started as a rainy turned into a beautiful sunny day just after the votes to legalize marriage for all were made, letting the rainbows worn by those at the support rally become amplified by real rainbows in the sky.
Taiwan has always been a progressive nation, and, yesterday, it became the first country in Asia to have a gay marriage law; making it an even more unique treasure here in Asia.
I was outside the building at the support rally, and the atmosphere there was so special and unique that I just had to share it with the world.
I want to offer my congratulations to all those who
have endured such a difficult journey.
I also want to share my story with you.
Two years ago, Taiwan’s Constitutional Court ruled that marriage was a right for all. Due to legal processes in Taiwan, however, there was a two year waiting period during which legislators had the opportunity to alter the law, otherwise the change would automatically go into effect.
The Legislative Yuan, the legislative branch of the government, held a hearing to vote on the proposed bills regarding same-sex marriage.
Hi, I’m Brian. A foreigner from America (the US) who has lived in Taipei, Taiwan for nearly 10 years and studied Mandarin Chinese for nearly 15 years. Welcome to Brian2Taiwan.
❤️🧡💛💚💙💜
Please PLEASE share and help me show the world how special Taiwan really is~
Sorry for the mistakes in the subtitles.
I did all the shooting, editing, and captioning myself, so some mistakes, inevitably, got by me. Thanks.
拜託拜託幫我分享，讓我告訴全台灣全球台灣多獨特～ 字幕裡的錯誤請見了. 因為自己拍攝、剪片、上字幕，難免有一些錯誤被我錯過. 謝謝
Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/Brian2Taiwan
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Brian2Taiwan
Instagram:
www.instagram.com/Brian2Taiwan
Twitter:
@Brian2Taiwan
#taiwan #gaymarriage #samesexmarriage
Your browser can't play this video. Learn more. Switch camera. ... <看更多>
processes中文 在 manufacturing processes中文-在PTT/IG/網紅社群上服務品牌 ... 的必吃
找manufacturing processes中文在Dcard與PTT討論/評價與推薦，提供process中文,manufacture中文,製程英文相關資訊，找manufacturing processes中文就在網路品牌潮流 ... ... <看更多>