徵才機關:國立屏東科技大學
人員區分:教育人員
官職等:無
職系:無
名額:1
性別:不拘
工作地點:90-屏東縣
有效期間:110/06/09~110/08/13
資格條件:
國立屏東科技大學110學年度第2學期徵聘「專任教師」公告(車輛系)
(自111年2月1日起聘) 公告日期:110年6月9日
■徵聘單位:車輛工程系所(電控相關領域)
■徵聘職稱:助理教授以上
■名額:1
■一般資格條件:具教育部認可之國內、外相關系所博士學位或具助理教授以上教師資格證書者。
■專長領域或特殊資格條件(含研究著作要求):
1.業界工作經驗至少3年(含業界產學合作期間)。
2.具電控相關背景,具以下研究領域經驗之一者為佳:
(1)影像追踪控制。
(2)自動駕駛。
(3)車輛主動式安全。
■Department:Department of Vehicle Engineering(Electronic/Control)
■Position:Assistant Professor
■Vacancy:1
■General Requirement:A Ph.D.’s degree recognized by the Ministry of Education of the R.O.C. in relevant fields is required or an experience as an assistant professor (or above) with an official teaching certificate.
■Specialization or Special Qualification(research and publication requirement included):
1.The applicant must have at least three-year industrial experience. The experience may include research project cooperated with the industry.
2.The applicant should have a Ph.D. background in electronic/control. He/she with one of the following expertises is preferable.
(1)Image tracking control.
(2)Autonomous steering control.
(3)Vehicle safety.
===================================================
工作項目:
■備註︰
一、以上應徵之「一般資格條件」及「專長領域或特殊資格條件(含研究著作要求)」,須於公告截止日前(110年8月13日)已具有博士學位或教育部核頒助理教授以上教師資格證書及相關佐證資料。
二、依「技術及職業教育法」第二十五條第一項規定,新聘專任教師如教授專業或技術科目者,應具備一年以上與任教領域相關之業界實務工作經驗之「專長領域或特殊資格條件」中有關「實務工作經驗」之審核,本校將依教育部訂定公布「技專校院專業科目或技術科目之教師業界實務工作經驗認定標準」規定辦理。
三、報名期間︰自公告日起至110年8月13日止截止收件。
四、報名方式︰一律採書面方式報名,收件至報名截止日止。
(一) 郵寄方式報名:以郵戳為憑,請寄送至91201屏東縣內埔鄉老埤村學府路1號,國立屏東科技大學人事室收。
(二) 親送方式報名:以本校人事室「職缺收件章」收件日期為憑,請於報名截止日前之本校工作日期間親送至本校行政中心二樓人事室,交由人事人員收執,並加蓋「職缺收件章」。
※應檢附之證件不齊或逾期者,均不予受理。※
五、聯絡電話︰08-7703202轉6112本校人事室朱小姐。
六、應徵信封右上角請務必註明「應徵者姓名」及「應徵單位/領域」;符合資格者由徵聘單位通知甄試,不合者恕不另行通知及函覆;如未獲錄取而需返還書面應徵資料,請附足額回郵信封以利郵寄。
七、獲聘為本校教師後,如學校因教學需要調整教師任教單位時,應無異議接受。
八、報名需繳送表件︰(各徵聘單位另有資料需求者,請依其需求辦理)
(一)個人基本資料表(請詳細註明通訊地址、聯絡電話、行動電話及電子郵件信箱)。
(二)新聘專任教師應徵人員資料簡表。
(三)專科以上學歷畢業證書影本(含教師資格證書影本),畢業學校如係國外學歷須為教育部所認可且經我國駐外單位驗證有案者,須於公告截止日前取得之學歷及教師資格證書始予採認。
(四)最高學歷歷年成績單影本,畢業學校如係國外學歷須為教育部所認可且經我國駐外單位驗證有案者。
(五)現職工作佐證文件(國外任職證明文件須附中文譯本並經我國駐外單位驗證)。
(六)檢附相關實務工作經驗之證明文件影本。(須於公告截止日前之實務工作經驗始予採認)
(七)其他有利於聘審之資格證明文件。
(八)國立屏東科技大學個人資料蒐集聲明暨同意書。
※※(一 ~ 八)項資料請勿膠封,使用長尾夾固定成冊即可※※
工作地址:
聯絡E-Mail:
聯絡方式:
九、前述第八項(1、2款)所需之「個人基本資料表」、「新聘專任教師應徵人員資料簡表」表格,刊登於本校首頁(網址:http://www.npust.edu.tw/)點選「徵才資訊」及人事室網站首頁(網址http://personnel.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php)最新消息、徵才求職,請自行下載相關表格使用;其中有關「新聘專任教師應徵人員資料簡表」,請另行以E-mail方式逕傳送以下相關系、所承辦人:
項目 系所 郵件信箱
(一) 車輛工程系 vehicle@mail.npust.edu.tw
十、請應徵者詳閱「本校個人資料蒐集聲明暨同意書」,確認同意相關事項後簽名,並隨同履歷資料繳件。
十一、獲得本校系(所、中心、室)教評會推薦聘任,但未具教育部核頒擬聘任職級之教師資格證書者,請俟系(所、中心、室)電話通知後,備齊「取得送審前一等級教師資格後之專門著作(作品、成就證明及技術報告),含代表著作及參考著作合計至多五件(送審講師、助理教授資格者,尚得以學位論文代替代表著作)。」合訂本一式五份,並寄送至本校辦理外審作業;未依通知時限繳送著作辦理外審者,不予聘任。送審後著作恕不退還。
十二、本校聘用前依性侵害犯罪加害人登記報到查訪及查閱辦法第14條及不適任教育人員之通報與資訊蒐集及查詢辦法第5條之規定,應申請查閱有無性侵害犯罪或不適任情形之紀錄。
十三、依本校專任教師聘任及升等審查辦法第8條規定略以,新聘教師應公開甄選,各系擬聘一名,需提送二至三人,…,應徵教師人數未達二人時,應簽請原公告延長,若連同第二次延長公告應徵教師人數仍未達二人時,應經系教評會重新檢視徵才專業領域或擬聘職級公告內容之適切性,並簽奉校長核定後重新公告之。各次徵才公告期間所有應徵教師應合併辦理,合併後應徵教師人數須達二人以上,始得進行初審工作。通過初審人數未達二人,應依前揭程序重新公告,公告期間至少二週為原則,已通過初審資格者應予保留。
十四、本公告同時刊登於下列網站:
(一)行政院人事行政總處網址http://www.dgpa.gov.tw/點選「事求人」。
(二)本校首頁網址http://www.npust.edu.tw/index.aspx 點選「求才資訊」。
(三)本校人事室網址http://personnel.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php點選「最新消息」/「徵才求職區」。
(四)全國就業通網址https://www.taiwanjobs.gov.tw/Internet/index/index.aspx 點選「找工作」。
(五)教育部全國大專教師人才網網址https://tjn.moe.edu.tw/index.php點選「職缺訊息」。
(六)科技部網址https://www.most.gov.tw/點選「動態資訊」/「求才訊息」。
(七)104人力銀行網址https://www.104.com.tw/index.cfm點選「找公司」。
<<** 詳細內容請依人事室網站公告內容為基準 **>>
<<** 相關報名表格請至人事室網站最新消息及徵才求職區下載 **>>
<<** 人事室網址http://personnel.npust.edu.tw/bin/home.php >>
職缺類別:
不使用應徵者履歷調閱
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過24萬的網紅暗網仔 2.0,也在其Youtube影片中提到,現在有一個聖誕Promo: 只要按Description ‘Deepwebkid’ 的link NordVPN申請有兩折優惠! 入會3年更送多你四個月的plan和一個價值$195美元的密碼儲存機. 請使用以下連結: https://nordvpn.com/deepwebkid 優惠碼: deepw...
internet safety中文 在 無待堂 Facebook 的精選貼文
【《砥鋒挺鍔 傲雪欺霜》- 大專學界就民主牆爭議之聲明 | “Arming Ourselves in Our Darkest Hour” - Declaration of Students’ Unions of Higher Institutions on the Controversy Surrounding Democracy Wall】
(Please scroll down for English version.)
近日,各大專院校對於學生使用民主牆爆發爭議,舔共傀儡林鄭月娥竟借機指言論自由並非完全沒有限制,更暗指學術自由和院校自主是鼓吹歪論的藉口。大學校園應為思想意見交流之所,民主牆亦是容許學生暢所欲言的公開平台。如今,政權之首竟出言鉗制學生表達自由,企圖向校方施壓,大興文字獄,大專學界予以最強烈之譴責。
在中大校園內,有同學於學生會管理的範圍掛上「香港獨立」橫額及於民主牆上貼上宣傳港獨之文宣。有關港獨之橫額及文宣並無違反香港法律,只是單單內容不合乎中大校方心意、與校方立場有異,校方便指鹿為馬,無理指控其內容違法,圖以法律之名打壓言論自由,更繞過該場地的真正管理者中大學生會,直接指派保安人員拆下橫額,完全無視學生自治的原則。大專學界強調,《基本法》性質類近憲法,而憲法訂明政府權限及人民權利。憲法圈限政府權力,政府卻絕不可借憲法縮窄人民權利。因此,政府及中大校方均不可以「違反《基本法》」為名,禁止學生討論香港獨立。
其後,中大學生會幹事會因是次事件而受到大規模滋擾。然而,校方並沒有就此作出回應並保護學生,反而因立場不同而置學生安危於不顧,有違教育者之原則,再證中大校方已淪為為政權護航的機器。
除此以外,早前有人於香港教育大學民主牆張貼「恭賀」教育局副局長蔡若蓮長子去世,教大校長高調批評該二人「歹毒」,更指若該二人不是教大學生,則「放他上網」。翌日,相關閉路電視截圖流出,實在令人髮指。的確,大專學界認為奚落蔡若蓮之言論確有失當,然而,冰封三尺非一日之寒。教育局多年來接連推出殘害莘莘學子之政策,當中包括全港性系統評估及國民教育,蔡若蓮為其一一護航,年青人對教育局及蔡若蓮的不滿無處發洩,最終訴於不當的情緒宣洩,實在是情有可原。教大校方縱然不滿此等言論,卻絕不可公開閉路電視片段。此等行為不但如同鼓吹社會公審批鬥,更有機會違反《個人資料(私隱)條例》。今日有人因失當言論被公開容貌,他日有學生批評校長,會否亦遭受類似報復?大專學界強烈譴責教大校方借機製造白色恐怖,並要求教大校方就洩露閉路電視片段作出合理交代。
《基本法》第二十七條訂明香港居民享有言論自由,我們的基本人權應受保障及尊重,而院校自主及學術自由更不容港共侵害。大專學界在此重申,言論自由是天賦人權,是不容侵犯之底線。我們將密切留意各大專院校之情況,堅守我們的自由與權利。
二零一七年九月十日
香港城巿大學學生會
恒生管理學院學生會
香港浸會大學學生會
香港科技大學學生會
嶺南大學學生會
香港珠海學院學生會
香港高等教育科技學院學生會
香港教育大學學生會
香港演藝學院學生會
香港大學學生會
香港公開大學學生會
香港樹仁大學學生會
香港中文大學學生會
In the past few days, controversy surrounding students’ use of their democracy wall has broken out and received widespread attention. Communist puppet Lam Cheng Yuet Ngor took the chance and implied that freedom of speech should be limited, and fallacies have been told under the veil of academic freedom and institutional autonomy. Universities are where thoughts and opinions are exchanged, and democracy walls are platforms for students to speak our mind. The regime is now making an explicit effort to limit our freedom of expression through exerting pressure on university authorities to punish those whose speech may have intimidated the people in power. Students’ Unions across the higher institutions condemn such atrocities.
In the Chinese University of Hong Kong, students hanged banner advocating Hong Kong independence at a site managed by Student Union of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Related leaflets were also posted to the democracy wall. Staggeringly, while the students by no means breached the law, the university authorities claimed that such advocacies as illegal and overrode CUSU by sending securities to remove the banner, revealing their complete ignorance to the autonomy of CUSU. Students’ Unions now reiterate that the nature of the Basic Law is similar to that of a constitution, which defines the power of the government and the liberty enjoyed by the citizenry. In other words, while the government is bound by the constitution, the government can never restrict the liberty of the people through the constitution. Thus, neither the government nor the university authorities can restrict the freedom of students to discuss Hong Kong independence under the name of the Basic Law.
Due to the controversy, the Executive Committee of CUSU has been suffering excessive nuisance. Yet, neither has there been any response from nor actions taken by the university authorities to protect the students. The authorities, as educators, should feel shameful for not ensuring the safety of students due to differences in opinions.
Apart from this, there were also two persons posting slogans to ‘congratulate’ Education Undersecretary Choi Yuk Lin’s loss of her son on the democracy wall at the Education University of Hong Kong. The President of EdUHK severely condemned the students as ‘vicious’, and claimed that the university would expose those persons on the internet if they were not students of EdUHK. Related shots of CCTV were then released to the media in the following day. Indeed, students’ unions believe the slogans are inappropriate. Yet, it is also important to acknowledge that the Education Bureau has been introducing malicious policies against students, ranging from TSA to national education, and Choi has been an explicitly pro-government person. With no effective channels to express their discontent, young people may have chosen such emotional and even irrational expression. Thus, while such slogans are inappropriate, we also find them excusable. Albeit their discontent, the university authorities should not have released the shots of CCTV to the media. Such action not only stirs up public emotions and ignites mass criticism against the two persons which would be completely out of proportion, but may also constitute violation of Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. Student may also be aware of similar vengeful acts when they criticise the university authorities again in the future. Students’ unions condemn the authorities of EdUHK for creating white terror and request the authorities to give a proper response regarding the leak of CCTV footage.
Under Article 27 of the Basic Law, we as Hong Kong citizens are entitled to the freedom of speech. Our rights must be protected and respected, while academic freedom and institutional autonomy are values that must not be stripped away. Students’ unions stress that everyone enjoys the freedom of speech, and this is the line that we shall never compromise. We are now paying attention to situation across the higher institutions and we are ready to defend our rights and liberty.
10 September 2017
City University of Hong Kong Students’ Union
Hang Seng Management College Students' Union
Hong Kong Baptist University Students’ Union
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Students’ Union
Lingnan University Students’ Union
Student Union of Chu Hai College of Higher Education
Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong Students’ Union
The Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts Students' Union
The Education University of Hong Kong Students’ Union
The Hong Kong University Students’ Union
The Open University of Hong Kong Students’ Union
The Student Union of Hong Kong Shue Yan University
The Student Union of The Chinese University of Hong Kong
internet safety中文 在 盧斯達 Facebook 的最佳解答
【《砥鋒挺鍔 傲雪欺霜》- 大專學界就民主牆爭議之聲明 | “Arming Ourselves in Our Darkest Hour” - Declaration of Students’ Unions of Higher Institutions on the Controversy Surrounding Democracy Wall】
(Please scroll down for English version.)
近日,各大專院校對於學生使用民主牆爆發爭議,舔共傀儡林鄭月娥竟借機指言論自由並非完全沒有限制,更暗指學術自由和院校自主是鼓吹歪論的藉口。大學校園應為思想意見交流之所,民主牆亦是容許學生暢所欲言的公開平台。如今,政權之首竟出言鉗制學生表達自由,企圖向校方施壓,大興文字獄,大專學界予以最強烈之譴責。
在中大校園內,有同學於學生會管理的範圍掛上「香港獨立」橫額及於民主牆上貼上宣傳港獨之文宣。有關港獨之橫額及文宣並無違反香港法律,只是單單內容不合乎中大校方心意、與校方立場有異,校方便指鹿為馬,無理指控其內容違法,圖以法律之名打壓言論自由,更繞過該場地的真正管理者中大學生會,直接指派保安人員拆下橫額,完全無視學生自治的原則。大專學界強調,《基本法》性質類近憲法,而憲法訂明政府權限及人民權利。憲法圈限政府權力,政府卻絕不可借憲法縮窄人民權利。因此,政府及中大校方均不可以「違反《基本法》」為名,禁止學生討論香港獨立。
其後,中大學生會幹事會因是次事件而受到大規模滋擾。然而,校方並沒有就此作出回應並保護學生,反而因立場不同而置學生安危於不顧,有違教育者之原則,再證中大校方已淪為為政權護航的機器。
除此以外,早前有人於香港教育大學民主牆張貼「恭賀」教育局副局長蔡若蓮長子去世,教大校長高調批評該二人「歹毒」,更指若該二人不是教大學生,則「放他上網」。翌日,相關閉路電視截圖流出,實在令人髮指。的確,大專學界認為奚落蔡若蓮之言論確有失當,然而,冰封三尺非一日之寒。教育局多年來接連推出殘害莘莘學子之政策,當中包括全港性系統評估及國民教育,蔡若蓮為其一一護航,年青人對教育局及蔡若蓮的不滿無處發洩,最終訴於不當的情緒宣洩,實在是情有可原。教大校方縱然不滿此等言論,卻絕不可公開閉路電視片段。此等行為不但如同鼓吹社會公審批鬥,更有機會違反《個人資料(私隱)條例》。今日有人因失當言論被公開容貌,他日有學生批評校長,會否亦遭受類似報復?大專學界強烈譴責教大校方借機製造白色恐怖,並要求教大校方就洩露閉路電視片段作出合理交代。
《基本法》第二十七條訂明香港居民享有言論自由,我們的基本人權應受保障及尊重,而院校自主及學術自由更不容港共侵害。大專學界在此重申,言論自由是天賦人權,是不容侵犯之底線。我們將密切留意各大專院校之情況,堅守我們的自由與權利。
二零一七年九月十日
香港城巿大學學生會
恒生管理學院學生會
香港浸會大學學生會
香港科技大學學生會
嶺南大學學生會
香港珠海學院學生會
香港高等教育科技學院學生會
香港教育大學學生會
香港演藝學院學生會
香港大學學生會
香港公開大學學生會
香港樹仁大學學生會
香港中文大學學生會
In the past few days, controversy surrounding students’ use of their democracy wall has broken out and received widespread attention. Communist puppet Lam Cheng Yuet Ngor took the chance and implied that freedom of speech should be limited, and fallacies have been told under the veil of academic freedom and institutional autonomy. Universities are where thoughts and opinions are exchanged, and democracy walls are platforms for students to speak our mind. The regime is now making an explicit effort to limit our freedom of expression through exerting pressure on university authorities to punish those whose speech may have intimidated the people in power. Students’ Unions across the higher institutions condemn such atrocities.
In the Chinese University of Hong Kong, students hanged banner advocating Hong Kong independence at a site managed by Student Union of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Related leaflets were also posted to the democracy wall. Staggeringly, while the students by no means breached the law, the university authorities claimed that such advocacies as illegal and overrode CUSU by sending securities to remove the banner, revealing their complete ignorance to the autonomy of CUSU. Students’ Unions now reiterate that the nature of the Basic Law is similar to that of a constitution, which defines the power of the government and the liberty enjoyed by the citizenry. In other words, while the government is bound by the constitution, the government can never restrict the liberty of the people through the constitution. Thus, neither the government nor the university authorities can restrict the freedom of students to discuss Hong Kong independence under the name of the Basic Law.
Due to the controversy, the Executive Committee of CUSU has been suffering excessive nuisance. Yet, neither has there been any response from nor actions taken by the university authorities to protect the students. The authorities, as educators, should feel shameful for not ensuring the safety of students due to differences in opinions.
Apart from this, there were also two persons posting slogans to ‘congratulate’ Education Undersecretary Choi Yuk Lin’s loss of her son on the democracy wall at the Education University of Hong Kong. The President of EdUHK severely condemned the students as ‘vicious’, and claimed that the university would expose those persons on the internet if they were not students of EdUHK. Related shots of CCTV were then released to the media in the following day. Indeed, students’ unions believe the slogans are inappropriate. Yet, it is also important to acknowledge that the Education Bureau has been introducing malicious policies against students, ranging from TSA to national education, and Choi has been an explicitly pro-government person. With no effective channels to express their discontent, young people may have chosen such emotional and even irrational expression. Thus, while such slogans are inappropriate, we also find them excusable. Albeit their discontent, the university authorities should not have released the shots of CCTV to the media. Such action not only stirs up public emotions and ignites mass criticism against the two persons which would be completely out of proportion, but may also constitute violation of Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. Student may also be aware of similar vengeful acts when they criticise the university authorities again in the future. Students’ unions condemn the authorities of EdUHK for creating white terror and request the authorities to give a proper response regarding the leak of CCTV footage.
Under Article 27 of the Basic Law, we as Hong Kong citizens are entitled to the freedom of speech. Our rights must be protected and respected, while academic freedom and institutional autonomy are values that must not be stripped away. Students’ unions stress that everyone enjoys the freedom of speech, and this is the line that we shall never compromise. We are now paying attention to situation across the higher institutions and we are ready to defend our rights and liberty.
10 September 2017
City University of Hong Kong Students’ Union
Hang Seng Management College Students' Union
Hong Kong Baptist University Students’ Union
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Students’ Union
Lingnan University Students’ Union
Student Union of Chu Hai College of Higher Education
Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong Students’ Union
The Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts Students' Union
The Education University of Hong Kong Students’ Union
The Hong Kong University Students’ Union
The Open University of Hong Kong Students’ Union
The Student Union of Hong Kong Shue Yan University
The Student Union of The Chinese University of Hong Kong
internet safety中文 在 暗網仔 2.0 Youtube 的最佳貼文
現在有一個聖誕Promo: 只要按Description ‘Deepwebkid’ 的link NordVPN申請有兩折優惠! 入會3年更送多你四個月的plan和一個價值$195美元的密碼儲存機.
請使用以下連結: https://nordvpn.com/deepwebkid
優惠碼: deepwebkid
會員:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8vabPSRIBpwSJEMAPCnzVQ/join
Jeff電單車VLOG: https://www.youtube.com/c/otobaiheathk?fbclid=IwAR0nXGa7C9MjRhJx2TskwgTjQjrQlYh5GY_khrSC0ilMvwU5WPfIunsVImI
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tourSubscribe:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8vabPSRIBpwSJEMAPCnzVQ?sub_confirmation=1
Deepfake換臉程式的黑暗秘密: 人類未來的危機
大家有沒有覺得這段Obama的演講有種很奇怪的感覺啊? 其實該片段是一年前導演Jordan Peele用一個名Deepfake的恐怖AI科技Key了美國總統的樣子上去的. Deepfake是能把任何人的樣子放在任何身體上. 用這種科技出ham片!楊幂中國deepfake事件! 甚至未來政治危機! 之後一一會講.
在危機處處的網絡世界我是用NordVPN保護自己的. 如果你們不想黑客入侵,個人資料被盜用NordVPN一向也是我上暗網的保護罩. 上去食人族暗網’wun食’? NordVPN! 到北韓網站看. NordVPN! Nordvpn無論Android iphone也可以用, 在機場, coffee shop, 甚至到中國大陸也行, 讓我本身住加拿大這個事實不容易被發現.
現在有一個聖誕Promo: 只要gum Description ‘Deepwebkid’ 的link NordVPN申請有兩折優惠! 入會3年更送多你四個月的plan和一個價值$195美元的密碼儲存機.
This is coming from my heart. Especially those with internet businesses like myself, this service not only secured our online identity but also our livelihood and safety. And this plan works in 6 simaltanoeus locations, meaning you and your family can all be protected from the dangers of the deep web.
Deepfake源自於一個名Interval Research corporation的網路科技研究中心. 1997年研究出Video rewrite program, 初步能夠將影片?面口型的畫面配合上後期加上的對白. 在Hollywood電影後製變成很重要的科技. 但要到20年之後Deepfake才得到主流關注. 2017年我們看到的 ‘Synthesizing Obama’ 網上流傳. 2017年尾這種科技才由授權人士掉到一般人的手中. 例如這個名 ‘fakeapp’ 的應用程式. 結果問題就開始了.
今天就講一下deepfake危機會出現的三個地方.
色情
2017年尾名 ‘deepfakes’ 的一位reddit討論區用戶上載了第一個自製Deepfake. 之後luk jook有各個女明星的deepfake出現. 女星的樣子放在A片女星的身體上. 高fung時一天數千條這些影片放上討論區.
但如果你只是普通的女生, 一醒來發現無數張有你樣子的色情照片和影片, 你又如何接受呢?
法律學生Noelle martins 17歲的時候發現網上有大量photoshop她的樣子的色情照片. 之後的5年, Noelle與各大的色情網站進行一個gim gooy的戰爭. 除即發現她身邊的朋友甚至自己的妹妹也成為這些Deepfake網站的受害者.
這個熱潮導致兩極分化. 道德上該事件一定是重大問題. 但另一邊學者認為色情行業一向都是推動新科枝的重要元素.
這其實sip及西方社會一個敏感的A片類型: 復仇色情片. 簡單講, 復仇色情片是一些ja男與女友分手後把她的裸照或親密片放給大家看的色情片內容.
Deepfake卻令到沒有拍過任何東西的女生也可能成為 ‘復仇’ 目標. Noelle martins就是一個越反抗越成為目標的例子.
楊冪
國內好多科技上的潮流也是來自外國. Deepfake也不列外. 這張照片曾在國內引發很大的關注. 大家覺得有問題嗎?
這張内地女演員楊冪的造型照來自於TVB 1994年射雕英雄傳 ‘黃蓉’ 的角色. 但1994年的楊冪只有8歲, 其實這是一個deepfake, 原本的造型是朱茵. 但真實程度讓影片出現在 ‘B站’ Bilibili後, 這種 ‘合成技術’ 在國內全面禁止.
Political event
外國明星樣子被deepfake惡搞卻常常發生. 演員Nicolas cage的樣子出現最多. Wonder Woman Gal Gadot的事件最為人熟悉.但看看這個片段(show hilary Clinton Saturday night live deepfake)
而這是美國總統Donald Trump. 被一名演員在模仿.
這科技成為政治工具一向是公眾最大yuw leuy. Shane Dawson的 ‘conspiracy theories with Shane Dawson’ 對deepfake也將這當作最大恐懼.
-2020 election
但將近2020年美國election, 一些不懂政治的人好可能會因爲看到領導者假的片段導致大gook有所改變. 正式加強一場名 ‘Cyberwar’ 的東西. Hacking, computer virus有危險性之外, 用media一些假的慨念到大眾的思想?面. 又名 ‘likewar’
...即是騙 ‘like’ 吧!
What’s being done to stop it
兩個月前Google發送了幾千條Deepfake影片給researchers. 幫助建立AI能查出那一些影片有deepfake成份. 美國有兩個州份Virginia和Texas已經法例禁止deepfake成人電影的發行. 同時雖然Deepfake本身在整個美國不是犯法, 用一條假的影片有意做詐騙行為是犯法的.
同月facebook創辦人mark zuckerberg國會大樓?面答應會嚴格監督Facebook feed 上面的新聞.
internet safety中文 在 Internet safety - 英中– Linguee词典 的相關結果
大量翻译例句关于"Internet safety" – 英中词典以及8百万条中文译文例句搜索。 ... <看更多>
internet safety中文 在 INTERNET SAFETY 中文是什么意思- 中文翻译 - Tr-ex 的相關結果
Internet safety goes beyond just protecting children from strangers · 网上安全远不止防止陌生人侵害小孩或拦阻不当内容。 ... <看更多>
internet safety中文 在 【英語技巧】一次學會網路安全用語(Internet Safety) - VoiceTube 的相關結果
How safe are you on the Internet? ... 【英語技巧】一次學會網路安全用語( Internet Safety ). 3623 582 ... 隱私權 ˙ 條款 ˙. 繁體 中文. 繁體 中文 ... <看更多>