【《神奇4俠》嘅失敗到底錯喺邊個身上?】
Josh Trank再次就《神奇4俠》嘅災難級失敗接受訪問,表示當時團隊認為佢係一個新人,唔識得去handle套咁嘅大片,又唔肯去同人溝通,亦都唔識跟片場嘅玩法。最後,佢自己一力承擔所有問題,受盡千夫所指。自己本身喺《奪命異能》後前途無可限量,但因為一套《神奇4俠》,令佢冇咗執導大片,甚至《星球大戰》系列嘅機會。
如今回望返轉頭,佢認為其實大家意見不合好正常,冇話邊個對或錯,只不過係一班錯嘅團隊喺埋一齊,要拍一套玩創意嘅電影,就注定失敗收場。咁到底《神奇4俠》羅生門事件邊個真邊個假,可能永遠都冇人知道。
事隔五年,佢套新戲《Capone》即將VOD上架,希望今次佢可以翻到身啦。
利申:我唔覺得《奪命異能》好到咁。
《神奇4俠》觀後感可看留言連結。
📣文字工作者也得要吃飯,你的支持是我的原動力。請給點心意,給小弟寫更多好文章,歡迎透過payme課金以作支持🥳:https://payme.hsbc/jackyhei
或使用QR code:https://bit.ly/3a9wOzy
或透過Paypal捐款:paypal.me/jackyhei
🙏感謝各位支持,小弟執筆之原創小說私人貨存已全部售罄,有意者可到此文章內的連結購買:https://bit.ly/3dRuUWu
【IG請follow】www.instagram.com/travelerwithmovie
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過18萬的網紅公視新聞網,也在其Youtube影片中提到,更多新聞與互動請上: 公視新聞網 ( http://news.pts.org.tw ) PNN公視新聞議題中心 ( http://pnn.pts.org.tw/ ) PNN 粉絲專頁 ( http://www.facebook.com/pnn... ) PNN Youtube頻道 ( http://...
ill-conceived 在 華人民主書院 New School for Democracy Facebook 的最佳解答
[Statement on the Hong Kong SAR Government Invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance]
1. The Hong Kong SAR Government has invoked the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (“ERO”) to implement the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation (“PFCR”) which will come into force at midnight on 5 October 2019. The PFCR will ban anyone from covering their faces in full or partially for mere presence in lawful rallies and marches, unlawful or unauthorised assemblies, or riots. The definition of “covering” includes surgical masks, gas masks, and other materials such as face paint. The PFCR also gives the police the power to order anyone to remove such covering.
2. The ERO is an outdated and vague piece of legislation that dates back to the 1920s. Its outdatedness makes it non-compatible with modern notions of civil liberties and rule of law. Its vaguesness confers enormous discretionary powers to the executive branch, which in turn makes it open to abuse especially in the current political climate where the government is under mounting pressure to put an end to the social unrest at any cost.
3. The ERO grants extensive powers to the executive branch to enact any regulation on the pretext of “public emergency” and “public danger", neither of which is defined under the ERO and can be broadly interpreted. More disconcertingly, the ERO contains no sunset clauses or other limits as to when such emergency or disorder would cease to exist. These decisions are to be made solely by the Chief Executive in council, who may go on to enact other regulations on a similar pretext, including curfews, martial law, censoring of social media and other communications or seizure of personal property. This slippery slope raises serious accountability and abuse of power concerns.
4. The PLG believes that the invocation of the ERO bypasses the legislative branch and undermines the constitutional checks and balances on the executive branch. The government's move represents a brazen disregard of the Legislative Council and further erodes Hong Kong's well-established separation of powers.
5. More crucially, the invocation of the ERO does nothing to quell the current social unrest or address the protesters' demands that have fueled months of violent clashes with the police. If anything, the PFCR will incite protesters even more and lead to further escalation of the movement.
6. Contrary to the government's claim that the PFCR is aimed at addressing violence, the fact that it applies equally to peaceful and violent demonstrators is a direct contradiction of that pretext. This is especially troubling considering that nonviolent protest participants are facing increasing pressure and threats of reprisal from their employers and are subject to random mobile phone checks at mainland border controls. Furthermore, without face masks, participants will be more exposed to tear gas and pepper spray during street demonstrations, both of which contain harmful toxins with potentially long term health effects. As such, the PFCR is expected to have a chilling effect on even legal protests and violate citizens' right to privacy and freedom of assembly.
7. What is more unjust and arbitrary is that according to the Secretary for Security, the PFCR exempts police officers from the face covering ban. Over the past four months, the city has witnessed increasingly violent and abusive behaviour on the part of law enforcement. The one-sidedness of the PFCR may result in increased impunity among officers and encourage them to step up violent crackdown of protesters who, apropos, have been demanding a more accountable police force among other things.
8. Broad and unchecked powers beget abuse, and any abuse of power threatens the rule of law. The invocation of the ERO today is a signal that the current administration is not interested in engaging the public in a constructive dialogue but that it continues to rely on the blunt instrument of law enforcement to solve a political crisis, even at the cost of tarnishing Hong Kong's reputation as a free port and financial hub.
9. The PLG calls on the government to immediately withdraw the PFCR and issue an apology for such an ill-conceived and unjustified attack on the rule of law and civil liberties.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
4 October 2019
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/y5fvpdok)
ill-conceived 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的最佳解答
[Statement on the Hong Kong SAR Government Invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance]
1. The Hong Kong SAR Government has invoked the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (“ERO”) to implement the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation (“PFCR”) which will come into force at midnight on 5 October 2019. The PFCR will ban anyone from covering their faces in full or partially for mere presence in lawful rallies and marches, unlawful or unauthorised assemblies, or riots. The definition of “covering” includes surgical masks, gas masks, and other materials such as face paint. The PFCR also gives the police the power to order anyone to remove such covering.
2. The ERO is an outdated and vague piece of legislation that dates back to the 1920s. Its outdatedness makes it non-compatible with modern notions of civil liberties and rule of law. Its vaguesness confers enormous discretionary powers to the executive branch, which in turn makes it open to abuse especially in the current political climate where the government is under mounting pressure to put an end to the social unrest at any cost.
3. The ERO grants extensive powers to the executive branch to enact any regulation on the pretext of “public emergency” and “public danger", neither of which is defined under the ERO and can be broadly interpreted. More disconcertingly, the ERO contains no sunset clauses or other limits as to when such emergency or disorder would cease to exist. These decisions are to be made solely by the Chief Executive in council, who may go on to enact other regulations on a similar pretext, including curfews, martial law, censoring of social media and other communications or seizure of personal property. This slippery slope raises serious accountability and abuse of power concerns.
4. The PLG believes that the invocation of the ERO bypasses the legislative branch and undermines the constitutional checks and balances on the executive branch. The government's move represents a brazen disregard of the Legislative Council and further erodes Hong Kong's well-established separation of powers.
5. More crucially, the invocation of the ERO does nothing to quell the current social unrest or address the protesters' demands that have fueled months of violent clashes with the police. If anything, the PFCR will incite protesters even more and lead to further escalation of the movement.
6. Contrary to the government's claim that the PFCR is aimed at addressing violence, the fact that it applies equally to peaceful and violent demonstrators is a direct contradiction of that pretext. This is especially troubling considering that nonviolent protest participants are facing increasing pressure and threats of reprisal from their employers and are subject to random mobile phone checks at mainland border controls. Furthermore, without face masks, participants will be more exposed to tear gas and pepper spray during street demonstrations, both of which contain harmful toxins with potentially long term health effects. As such, the PFCR is expected to have a chilling effect on even legal protests and violate citizens' right to privacy and freedom of assembly.
7. What is more unjust and arbitrary is that according to the Secretary for Security, the PFCR exempts police officers from the face covering ban. Over the past four months, the city has witnessed increasingly violent and abusive behaviour on the part of law enforcement. The one-sidedness of the PFCR may result in increased impunity among officers and encourage them to step up violent crackdown of protesters who, apropos, have been demanding a more accountable police force among other things.
8. Broad and unchecked powers beget abuse, and any abuse of power threatens the rule of law. The invocation of the ERO today is a signal that the current administration is not interested in engaging the public in a constructive dialogue but that it continues to rely on the blunt instrument of law enforcement to solve a political crisis, even at the cost of tarnishing Hong Kong's reputation as a free port and financial hub.
9. The PLG calls on the government to immediately withdraw the PFCR and issue an apology for such an ill-conceived and unjustified attack on the rule of law and civil liberties.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
4 October 2019
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/y5fvpdok)
ill-conceived 在 公視新聞網 Youtube 的精選貼文
更多新聞與互動請上:
公視新聞網 ( http://news.pts.org.tw )
PNN公視新聞議題中心 ( http://pnn.pts.org.tw/ )
PNN 粉絲專頁 ( http://www.facebook.com/pnn... )
PNN Youtube頻道 ( http://www.youtube.com/user... )
PNN livehouse.in頻道 ( http://livehouse.in/channel/PNNPTS )
ill-conceived 在 Ill-conceived Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster 的相關結果
The meaning of ILL-CONCEIVED is badly planned : not showing good judgment. How to use ill-conceived in a sentence. ... <看更多>
ill-conceived 在 Ill-conceived definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary 的相關結果
Ill -conceived definition: If you describe a plan or action as ill-conceived , you mean that it is likely to fail or... | Meaning, pronunciation ... ... <看更多>
ill-conceived 在 ill-conceived中文(繁體)翻譯:劍橋詞典 的相關結果
4 天前 — ill-conceived翻譯:計劃不周的;不明智的。了解更多。 ... <看更多>