.
| 宅家防疫跟著中醫師這樣做
support your immune system |
| WELLNESS 專欄配圖 |
| 收錄於 VOGUE 國際中文版 JULY 2021 |
#summerise #illustration #vogue #love #covid19 #wellness #beauty #art #woman #covid #flower #virus #epidemic #prevention #health #good #keep #immune #body #hand #doctor #mask #isolation #home #WFH #taiwan
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,480的網紅KeNNyVDO,也在其Youtube影片中提到,【電影NG】美國隊長3:英雄內戰NG片段 | KeNNyPlay3omething Marvel's 'Captain America: Civil War' finds Steve Rogers leading the newly formed team of Avengers in thei...
body system中文 在 吳文遠 Avery Ng Facebook 的最佳解答
【6.12:追求民主、自由、公義和法治的聲音,依然是佔香港的大多數】
https://youtu.be/qhrwmxeshVw
———————————
文遠交低話大家記住一定要撐 #文遠Patreon 呀!
⭐️支持文遠⭐️請訂閱Patreon⭐️
⭐️Please show your support by subscribing to Avery’s Patreon ⭐️
www.patreon.com/AveryNg
———————————
兩年前的2019年6月12日,我們香港人團結一致地,至少暫時阻擋了送中條例的立法。雖然當年我們成功阻截了送中條例,但是當時政權察覺到,就算由它們佔據了立法會的大多數,我們民主派還是有能力去抵抗,所以現在它們推出了新的選舉制度。在新制度下,立法會的代表性和人大政協已沒有多大差別,更加無需再討論是否參選或如何投票。
但我還是要提醒各位,縱使今天的狀況有多艱難,縱使政權如何出盡茅招也好,記住、記住、記住,我們在香港追求民主、自由、公義和法治的聲音,依然是佔香港的大多數。正正是因為我們佔據了大多數,這個政府才會出盡茅招去扭曲現時的議會,去扭曲全個制度,它們甚至乎扭曲了整個遊戲規則還不夠,還要將任何反對抱異見的人掃入監倉。
您鎖得住我的肉體,卻鎖不了我的靈魂,更加鎖不了我把口!希望各位在牆外的朋友,尤其是今天這麼熱的日子,見字飲水,KEEP 住我們的動力,我們終有一天是會勝利、是會成功的!
——————————-
[6.12: Voices in pursuit of democracy, freedom, justice and the rule of law are still the majority in Hong Kong]
Two years ago, on 12 June 2019, we in Hong Kong united to stop, at least temporarily, the Extradition Bill. It is very important to note that on that day, we showed our courage and solidarity in Admiralty. Although we have succeeded in stopping the Extradition Bill back then, look at Hong Kong today - we are still under the shameless Carrie Lam regime. At that time, the regime realised that even if they had the majority in the Legislative Council, we democrats were still capable of resisting, so now they have introduced a new electoral system. Under the new system, the representativeness of the Legislative Council is not much different from that of the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, and there is no need to discuss whether to run for election or how to vote.
I must remind you that no matter how difficult the situation is today, no matter how hard the regime tries to suppress us, REMEMBER - the majority in Hong Kong are in the pursuit of democracy, freedom, justice and the rule of law. This is precisely why this government has gone to great lengths to distort the current legislature, to distort the whole system, and they have even gone so far as to throw anyone in opposition into jail.
You can lock up my body, but not my soul, and not my mouth!
I don't know when I'll be back, but I hope that all of you outside the walls, especially on such a hot day, to take care of yourselves, and keep up our momentum, so that one day we will win and succeed. In the mean time, take care!
#612
#612基金
#反送中
———————————
文遠交低話大家記住一定要撐 #文遠Patreon 呀!
⭐️支持文遠⭐️請訂閱Patreon⭐️
⭐️Please show your support by subscribing to Avery’s Patreon ⭐️
www.patreon.com/AveryNg
body system中文 在 Charles Mok 莫乃光 Facebook 的最讚貼文
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】
// 當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
// Where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.455221741311…/1474268236073377/
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】(Scroll for English)
1. 近日,警隊的行為就如國際特赦組織所言越見低劣。[1] 這皆因政府漠視其專家提供的建議,並以歇斯底里、毫無章法可言的策略回應持續的動盪。
2. 五個月來,政府持續容許以下情況發生,對警政問題及根本的政治危機藥石亂投:
a. 阻礙救護人員前往現場拯救傷者;[2]
b. 偏頗地處理強姦或酷刑對待被拘留人士的指控;[3]
c. 肆無忌憚地濫用武力;[4]
d. 以諸多藉口為警察的失控或報復行為辯解。[5]
3. 法政匯思強烈譴責警隊濫用武力,及其本末倒置、往往為社區添煩添亂的驅散示威者行動。警方在十一月十一日於香港中文大學(「中大」)、香港理工大學及香港大學等驅散非法集結及/或堵路行為的行動,指稱的事實根據惹人非議。[6] 在撰寫此聲明之時,警方甚至以催淚彈及橡膠子彈回應中大校長的善意,與學生發生激烈衝突,造成最少60人受傷及多人被捕。[7]
4. 歸根究底,現有的制度未能公正地調查涉及警務人員的刑事指控,乃是警民衝突的源頭。樂觀地看,這可能只是個別調查人員的疏忽;悲觀地看,這反映一種互相包庇的文化,可能已由員佐級警員到警務處處長、保安局局長甚至特首,滲透警隊及政府上下。無論是哪一個情況,這種警察橫行無忌的觀感已經令公眾對負責調查大部分罪行的警察的信任蕩然無存。這個缺口一開,刑事司法制度剩下非常有限的能力,處理失職警員。
5. 法政匯思繼續呼籲香港政府成立獨立調查委員會,調查包括六月份以來政府的治安管理手段。除了將肇事者繩之於法外,更重要的是全面檢閱香港警隊以達至結構上的改革。至今,特區政府對於這個明顯又實際的選擇不屑一顧,堅持讓一個缺乏監察權力的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會(「監警會」)[8] 去調查警察投訴及內部調查科。這正正就是問題根源所在。
6. 監警會委派的國際專家組就這個問題發表《進展報告》。國際專家組與政府持相反意見。他們批評監警會在結構上欠缺全面調查權力,對監警會這一個輕型、監管式的體制是否能夠做出決定性的貢獻表示懷疑,更指出下一步的可能性諸如「委派一個享有所需權力的獨立調查機構以作更深程度及更廣泛的調查」,意味著一個獨立調查委員會。[9]
7. 對於近數星期暴力頻頻,政府沒有採取任何行動,只是堅拒示威者的訴求(包括成立獨立調查委員會),更稱他們為「人民的敵人」。[10] 警員們多月來非人化地濫稱示威者為「曱甴」。[11]
8. 法政匯思絕對不認同法外制裁。此立場於七月二十五日之聲明已表明。然而,當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
法政匯思
2019年11月15日
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
1. Police conduct has seen, in the words of Amnesty International, ‘another shocking low’ [1] in recent days as the Government ignored constructive feedback by its own experts and hysterically responded to the ongoing unrest without any rational strategy.
2. In particular, these allegations point to a wanton failure on the part of the Government to properly approach policing and the underlying political crisis, now in its 5th month:
a. Obstructing rescuers and ambulances from accessing the injured; [2]
b. Unfair handling of allegations of rape and torture in custody; [3]
c. Unapologetic excesses in its use of force; [4] and
d. Evasive defence of police officers acting impulsively or in retaliation. [5]
3. The Progressive Lawyers Group (the ‘PLG’) vehemently condemns the Police regarding their excessive use of force and dispersal operations which often create the chaos sought to be quelled. On 11 November, the police conducted operations in, amongst others, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (‘CUHK’), the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong to disperse unlawful assemblies and/or obstruction of traffic, [6] the factual basis of which has been doubted by many. As at the drafting of this Statement, as riot police responded to an olive branch by the CUHK Vice-Chancellor with tear gas and rubber bullets, severe clashes between students and riot police at CUHK are ongoing with at least 60 injured and dozens arrested. [7]
4. Nonetheless, the crux of the problem remains in the institutional failure to investigate criminal allegations involving police officers impartially. At best, it could be an omission by individual police officers in their execution of duty. At worst, it could be a culture that acquiesces and conceals wrongdoings affecting grassroot constables, the Commissioner of Police, the Secretary for Security and the Chief Executive alike. Whichever the case may be, this perception of impunity breaches the trust and confidence the public reposes in the police who are tasked with investigating most offences. With this link broken, there remains very limited recourse in the criminal justice system against rogue officers.
5. The PLG continues to call on the Hong Kong Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry regarding, amongst others, the current approach to policing social unrest since June. Bringing wrongdoers to justice aside, the more important task is a holistic review on the Police Force and a roadmap to structural reforms. So far, the Government brushed aside this obvious and pragmatic option, insisting upon an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Council (‘IPCC’) [8] whose (lack of) oversight over the Complaints Against Police Office (‘CAPO’) is the very issue at the heart of the current saga.
6. Curiously, the International Expert Panel of the IPCC appointed for advice on that very inquiry seems to hold a contrary view. In their Position Statement Report of Progress, the experts pointed out ‘structural limitations in the scope and powers of the IPCC Inquiry’ and noted that ‘it remains to be seen whether a light touch, oversight body like the IPCC, can make sufficient progress to produce any decisive contribution…’ It also identified a possible next step such as ‘a deeper more comprehensive inquiry in a number of respects by an independent body with requisite powers’, alluding to a Commission of Inquiry. [9]
7. In response to the extraordinary brutalities these few weeks, the Government did nothing but maintain that it will not yield to the protesters’ demands (including an independent Commission of Inquiry) and call them ‘enemies of the people’. [10] It has not helped that the police have for months been blatantly using such a dehumanising term as ‘cockroaches’ to refer to protesters [11].
8. The PLG stands by our Statement on 25 July 2019 and does not encourage citizens to take justice into their own hands. However, it is obvious by now that where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
15 November 2019
(PDF version: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
body system中文 在 KeNNyVDO Youtube 的精選貼文
【電影NG】美國隊長3:英雄內戰NG片段 | KeNNyPlay3omething
Marvel's 'Captain America: Civil War' finds Steve Rogers leading the newly formed team of Avengers in their continued efforts to safeguard humanity. But after another incident involving the Avengers results in collateral damage, political pressure mounts to install a system of accountability, headed by a governing body to oversee and direct the team. The new status quo fractures the Avengers, resulting in two camps-one led by Steve Rogers and his desire for the Avengers to remain free to defend humanity without government interference, and the other following Tony Stark's surprising decision to support government oversight and accountability
美國隊長帶領全新組合的復仇者聯盟,繼續保衛地球。但當一宗大型事故,令捲入其中的復仇者連累受害後,有政治壓力要求引入問責制,成立新的管治組織管理復仇者。由此導致復仇者分裂成為兩大陣營——由美國隊長帶領的一方竭力維持自主免受政府干預,另一方的鐵甲奇俠卻出人意表地靠攏政權。勢不兩立之際,一班復仇者還要面對新的邪惡強敵⋯⋯
CAPTAIN AMERICA Civil War Bloopers
Cast : Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie, Emily VanCamp, Don Cheadle, Jeremy Renner, Chadwick Boseman, Paul Bettany, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd et Frank Grillo, William Hurt, Daniel Brühl.
Genre : Super Hero, Action, Blockbuster
CAPTAIN AMERICA Civil War Making of
© 2016 - Marvel
Share this video:
https://youtu.be/NnYbRd497sU
想留意更多我的動態,記得緊貼KeNNy Play3omething
KeNNy Play3omething社交平台:
KeNNy Play3omething channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC__D5Ugf9WdWk1qY7H4p4Ig
KeNNy Play3omething facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/kennyplay3omething/
KeNNy Play3omething Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/kennyplay3omething/