上個月是世界乳癌月,因為有乳癌基因BRCA1與BRCA2的突變(統稱BRCA) 而做預防性乳房切除的議題再次被討論。女性大眾一生中約有八分之一的機率會得到乳癌,如果不幸有 BRCA 基因突變的女性則約有 80% 的機率會得乳癌 。(40% 的機率得卵巢癌)
很顯然有這個基因突變會大幅增加得到乳癌的機率。再者,有突變病人的乳癌比其他人更難治療也更容易復發。影星安潔莉娜∙裘莉就是因爲有這個基因的突變而決定做預防性的全乳房與卵巢切除。但為什麼各國的婦產科醫學會大都不推薦所有女性做BRCA 突變的檢測? 早點知道基因檢測的結果會有壞處嗎?我自己尋找資料後希望與各位分享我的想法,希望大家能更了解這個題目。
基因是人體細胞內含的遺傳資訊單位,它像是身體裡的零件製造代碼,代碼寫錯時做出來的零件就會有問題,而代碼的儲存媒介是雙股DNA,它像拉鏈一樣接合以便保存遺傳資訊,待基因需要表現時細胞會把DNA像拉鏈一樣拉開,轉錄為mRNA 最終轉譯為蛋白質,而各種不同的蛋白質表現成了各種細胞的變化,形成外在人與人之間不同的表現 如酒渦或髮線。(可惜的是我兩者都沒有)顯性的基因變化代表只要從父母任一方遺傳到這個變化便會表現出來,隱性的基因變化代表必需從父母雙方都遺傳到這個變化才會表現出來。BRCA 屬於顯性基因。
健康BRCA基因製造的蛋白質可以抑制細胞不正常的增生而突變的結果,造成所製造的蛋白質無法有效的抑制細胞增生進而產生癌症,約400個人就有一個帶有此突變,對個人來說,只要花幾千塊可以找到這個高度致癌因子是否存在有何不可?在美國婦產科學會的調查中,只有40% 的醫生認為每位女性都可以做 ,我認為原因在於檢測結果的後續行動,在目前的科技下還沒有專家們明確的共識。 雖然有些方法可以降低BRCA突變病人發生乳癌的風險(如吃藥或手術)姑且不論這些方法本身含有的風險,但陽性不代表一定會得乳癌,而陰性也不代表得乳癌的機率會大幅降低。 (約90% 的乳癌病人都沒有BRCA突變) 所以尤其是對於無其他風險的健康女性來說 ,檢測結果背後意義,其複雜度與心理負擔遠比一般的抽血(如膽固醇檢測) 來的大許多,而其必要性也可受討論。
目前國際上的共識是除了需要詳盡的檢測前基因諮詢外,也建議已經有其他危險因子,如家族史 年齡早發(50歲前)乳癌,同患乳癌與卵巢癌的病人考慮做基因檢測,才會有比較大的幫忙。希望這些想法能幫助考慮做乳癌基因檢測的各位做參考,有不詳盡的方面也請多包涵。
======================================================================
The breast cancer genes BRCA1 and 2 (BRCA) made its biggest fame with Angelina Jolie’s decision to undergo preventive breast and ovary surgical removal after learning she carries a pathogenic mutation of BRCA. There is about a 1 in 8 chance of getting breast cancer in a woman’s lifetime. With the BRCA mutations, the risk of developing breast cancer can be as high as 80%. (and about 40% chance of developing ovarian cancer).
Having a pathogenic mutation in BRCA greatly increases the risk of developing breast cancer (and ovarian cancer). Moreover, breast cancer in patients with BRCA mutation tends to be more aggressive and more likely to recur. It seems intuitive to screen for BRCA mutation in every woman. However, most professional bodies around the world do not recommend routine BRCA testing because the carrier rate is low (approximately 0.25% in the general population). Also, there is no conclusive evidence on non-surgical methods of risk reduction. (Hormone antagonists such as Tamoxifen has only been shown to reduce breast cancer in the general population but not patients with BRCA mutation)
Prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy is very effective at reducing the risk of breast ( 50% reduction) and ovarian cancer (80% reduction) in patients with BRCA mutation, although the risk is not completely eliminated. However, not everyone who carries the BRCA gene will develop breast/ovarian cancer, so there is potentially an unnecessary surgical risk if one chooses to undertake prophylactic surgery.
Pre-test genetic counselling should be considered in everyone who wishes to take the BRCA testing. Currently the recommendation for women is those who have a strong family history of breast cancer, breast cancer younger than 50 years of age or patients with both breast and ovarian cancer.
========================================================================
BRCA: The Breast Cancer Gene [Internet]. National Breast Cancer Foundation. [cited 2020 Nov 29]. Available from: https://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/what-is-brca/
Kim E-K, Park SY, Kim S-W. Clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA-associated breast cancer in Asian patients. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020 May 14;54(4):265–75.
Hung F-H, Wang YA, Jian J-W, Peng H-P, Hsieh L-L, Hung C-F, et al. Evaluating BRCA mutation risk predictive models in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan. Scientific Reports. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10229.
Sung P-L, Wen K-C, Chen Y-J, Chao T-C, Tsai Y-F, Tseng L-M, et al. The frequency of cancer predisposition gene mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in Taiwan: From BRCA1/2 to multi-gene panels. PLOS ONE. 2017 Sep 29;12(9):e0185615.
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過13萬的網紅暗網仔出街,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour 訂閱: https://www.youtube.com/chan...
「because so題目」的推薦目錄:
- 關於because so題目 在 李木生醫師 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於because so題目 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於because so題目 在 Sabrina Cheung 張蔓莎 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於because so題目 在 暗網仔出街 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於because so題目 在 看板GMAT - Re: [問題] PP1-SC-54 - 批踢踢實業坊 的評價
- 關於because so題目 在 So // So that // Because 輕鬆掌握考好英文技巧- YouTube 的評價
- 關於because so題目 在 多益文法: “given that”, “now that”, 跟“so that”意義跟用法的差別 的評價
- 關於because so題目 在 第一部份:單一選擇題 的評價
because so題目 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳解答
今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
because so題目 在 Sabrina Cheung 張蔓莎 Facebook 的最佳解答
「當你真心渴望某樣東西時,整個宇宙都會聯合起來幫助你完成。」
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
這句語錄大家一定毫不陌生,近期很想得到一些前進的力量,想起了這本書。
第一次看這書是英文版 ——《The Alchemist》 ,印象是當年公開考試前英文科要做SBA (Student-Based Assessment),要選一本書做指定的task,我的題目類似是:
當時我覺得這書有點像《小王子》般的存在,簡單地說著大智慧。
故事是以古老寓言形式訴說一個追尋夢想的牧羊少年,遇上了不同的人和事,最後頓悟寶藏所在。
近期看一次中文版,發現裡面有更多的話語觸動到我:
「他們會要求你改變自己來遷就他們,如果你不是他們期待的樣子,他們就會不高興。絕大多數人似乎都很清楚別人該怎麼過活,卻對自己的一無所知。」
書中一再強調人的「天命」,「天命」就是你一直想去作的事。
「每個人,在他們年輕的時候,都知道自己的天命。」然而,隨著歲月流逝,我們卻慢慢深埋了內心的渴望,別人的想法也不知不覺變得比自己的天命更重要,卻在這時我們已離自己的「天命」越來越遠了。
「你的心在哪裏,你的寶藏也在那裏。」
我們會措手不及,只因未夠了解和傾聽自己的心。
牡羊少年遇見的每一個人,讓他遭受到很多阻礙和疑惑,可是這一切都使他領悟到新的課題,我們經歷的一切都只讓我們成為更完整的人罷。
The wise are wise only because they love. And the foolish are foolish only because they think they can understand love.
當我們經歷了世紀末的哀傷、不安、墮落、未知,可能已經漸漸失去前進的力量,
這時候只希望我們能從「愛」中得到更多的力量。
‘’So, I love you because the entire universe
conspired to help me find you.‘’
#S書選
because so題目 在 暗網仔出街 Youtube 的最佳貼文
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour
訂閱: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKC6E5s6CMT5sVBInKBbPDQ?sub_confirmation=1
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/album/2LjUOH9T9j21GiX8jzytu6
異度空間恐怖APP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PiyPZ3d_Fw&t=12s
首支單曲: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UASHWB6Ai9Y
鬼故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CfqxuCHq3Y&t=3s
我的成長故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdhtp6A6YJE
我講 '香港' 10,000次: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G4uDe3QUfs
我受夠了, 我的精神困擾: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ6uxaQhiS4&t=7s
24小時內學印度話: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3EmtyVK1BQ&t=55s
最後發現我有1種強迫症!
發現我有1種強迫症!
發現我有身體聚焦強迫症!
發現我有一種強迫症!
我有身體聚焦重複行為障礙 (強迫症的一種)-精神問題
發現我有身體聚焦強迫症!
最近看杜汶凙喱騷講強迫症的題目令我想到今年加拿大疫情最差時自己也表示有強迫症的症狀: 咬手指. (Show clip)片中他提及的數格子等的強迫症行為其實我小時候每隔地上走過兩步格子會喜歡跪一次在地上. 睡覺前數自己眨多少次眼, 不能有6或者6有關或pooy數. 例如: 6,12, 16, 18也不行. 因為6是魔鬼的號碼. 如果眨了6次眼要馬上眨到7,8, 或9. 或when I use to sit in the car I needed to use both sides of my hand to touch the car window. 4 times with both hands. I don’t even know why.
長大後我慢慢tou ley這些重複性的精神狀態. 這些年唯一陪伴我的是咬手指.
今天的身分拍這條影片不是而暗網仔的身分去拍, 而是為我自己找出答案. 因為彈琴或任何要show手指的行為有時都會有goo leuy. 因為不漂亮.
I know theirs a billion people will worst tragic fates than me and this is such a stupid small problem but this channel is for me to express my self.
這幾天找到原來這類型的強迫症學名叫 ‘身體聚焦重複行為障礙’ 是你重複obsessively對自己肉身做成的創傷. 這個koy kuet名詞令我發現自己某一些其他我曾經以為正常的行為也其實是強迫症. 當然咬手指是我最明顯的symptom. But like biting my lips, bitinh the inside of my mouth (like this) biting other parts of my hand, picking my bitten fingernails. Scratching my eyes inner part, before my elbows I constantly scratched for no reason. It’s almost like self harm.
I used to think everyone did this at least bit their lips.
Now the reasons for this some believe is anxiety. But honestly I bite my hands when I’m either bored or thinking. I think it’s a mixture because when I upload a video and I’m writing the tags and all that I’m both thinking but also anxious because I’m nervous about the video performance. So I think for me it’s both those things.
Now a cause of 身體聚焦重複行為障礙或BFRB有一些人説有自己問題外還有遺傳成分. 因為我也真的見過長booy有scratch themselves的習慣.
My solution: after watching this video they told me that the solution is not to stop yourself from the impulse of doing these things before that’ll only make you want to do it more. Actually it is to be conscious in that moment that you want to do this and do another action as a replacement. So what I did is I pretend I’m playing the piano every time I get this self harm impulse. Strange it when I do this my mouth still moves and if I were biting my nails or my lips and yesterday I caught myself constantly want to bite.
But over time it has gotten easier. And I think with enough effort I can stop this. Because honestly my nails are traumatized beyond belief and it’s been so long time I’ve had to cut nails because they don’t grow and is so weak. When I scratch an itch it feels weak. Like it’s gotta fall off. And it’s just...I don’t want that you know so let’s try to change it.
Thanks for letting me make this weird video bye.
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ujp2NdYx70I/hqdefault.jpg)
because so題目 在 So // So that // Because 輕鬆掌握考好英文技巧- YouTube 的必吃
![影片讀取中](/images/youtube.png)
一次了解小六英文呈分試常見題型: So 、 So that、 Because 查詢及了解更多課程內容:https://wa.me/85296131636關於 ... ... <看更多>
because so題目 在 多益文法: “given that”, “now that”, 跟“so that”意義跟用法的差別 的必吃
... because he knows the boss. (彼得認識老闆, 所以受到特殊待遇). 2.2 My cold won't ... 題目在整個L2的考題中佔多少比例呢 ? 這個問題我們以ETS出版的官方題庫“TOEIC ... ... <看更多>
because so題目 在 看板GMAT - Re: [問題] PP1-SC-54 - 批踢踢實業坊 的必吃
because of / Due to / With + N + Ving 的用法
主要不好的原因是 - 如此使用失去講解整個因果關係的結構
GMAT 的偏好性是 動詞 > 名詞,句子 > 名詞子句
基本上 如果題目出現 since/because + N + V
because of / Due to / With + N + Ving
絕對有超過八成的機率是前者正確
如果你跟我一樣 修辭沒有下面兩位高手強 那可以直接當考點來做
至少我實際考試時 我的確用了這個方法作了兩題 拿了還不差的分數
即使是前文舉的例子:
Because of a law passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by
imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold
原文和 Manhattan 解釋在此,就不全貼上了: https://ppt.cc/_Di7
基本上其他選項也都是使用
because of / Due to / With + N + Ving 的架構
唯一不是的 (C) 選項是連文法都錯誤 我相信也不會有人選
以一般台灣考生而言 要判斷 because of + N + Ving
而這個 N 或是 V 哪個是主要的因果主題 那是太難了
總結: N + Ving 當原因的句子有可能對 但機率小
且幾乎很少看過 N + V 的用法比不上 N + Ving 的答案解釋
※ 引述《danyuchn (Javy)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《A2GMAT (A兔GMAT)》之銘言:
: : whereas在官方版的解釋上是說副詞子句和主要子句盡量對稱(但不強迫), 不過這邊給你
: : 一個技巧, 通常考對比時whereas常當正確答案!
: : 這題我會先刪掉c, 因為c的cooking with spices是表動作的動名詞(working verb),
: : 不過like/unlike後面接的名詞通常是一般性名詞, 表動作動名詞重點是在表動作, 在
: : gmat的標準英文中, 想表動作請用子句, 也就是whereas/although/but S+V+O
: 補充一下:
: 這也就是我們通常看到because of + N + Ving會是GMAT較不偏好用法的原因
: 比如此OG題:
: In late 1997, the chambers inside the pyramid of the Pharaoh Menkaure at Giza
: were closed to visitors for cleaning and repair [due to moisture exhaled bv
: tourists, which raised its humidity to such levels so that salt from the
: stone was crystallizing] and fungus was growing on the walls.
: (D) because of moisture that was exhaled by tourists raising the humidity
: within them to levels so high as to make the salt from the stone crystallize
: (E) because moisture exhaled by tourists had raised the humidity within them
: to such levels that salt from the stone was crystallizing
: D選項的Ving有修飾tourists的歧義,
: 就算是because of moisture raising ...
: 也會形成句意斷裂:because of moisture (which raised...)
: 「因為濕氣」(升高濕度變成了只修飾moisture的成份)
: 而完整的意思應該是「因為潮濕升高濕氣(這個動作)」
: OG解釋:
: the entire construction is awkward, wordy, and ambiguous
: 正確選項E則用because子句,完整的「潮濕升高溼氣」的動作表原因。
: 同理Prep題目供你參考:
: [Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile
: phones are increasingly common, many people] now using their mobile phones to
: make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous
: wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly
: fee.
: 錯誤選項
: A. Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as
: mobile phones are increasingly common, many people
: 正解
: D. With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile
: phones becoming increasingly common, many people are
: 不過有一個地方要小心:
: (GWD-19-Q18)
: [On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by
: imprisonment that a United States citizen hold] gold in the form of bullion or
: coins, immigrants found that on arrival in the United States they had to
: surrender all of the gold they had brought with them.
: 正確選項D:
: Because of a law passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by imprisonment
: for a United States citizen to hold
: 這裡的law本身是核心原因,因此making就算修飾law也不會有句意斷裂的問題。
: 供您參考。
: Dustin
--
每月專修及機經家教課程
幫助各位複習數學更有效率 更確實
GMAT 留學考試 - 勇闖夢想的新鮮人
https://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.186.117
※ 編輯: dounts 來自: 220.136.186.117 (09/25 09:50)
... <看更多>