#立會去留 #RTHKLettertoHK
Participating in the upcoming extended term of the legislative council is, I feel, the lesser of two evils. Of course the one-year postponement of the election which should have been held this month was an anti-democratic trick by the government to avoid facing the voters. The extended term surely lacks legitimacy in the public eye.
But with liberal and democratic institutions being constantly undermined by an executive seeking to bring the other arms of government under its control, we must take every opportunity to voice our concerns, use every forum to fight back in the interests of Hong Kong’s governance, and the promises enshrined in the Basic Law.
Of course previously I’ve had my reservations about staying on, as it would mean accepting a quasi Beijing appointment in an un-elected legislature, ie without the people’s mandate. I’ve had my moments of a psychic tug-of-war.
It’s also understood that many of our young view some of the veterans in the democratic camp as washouts, that they belong to an earlier civilisation and should have been “outed” anyway. Some online criticism would go as far as, and I quote, “Can’t let go of the pay and the glory associated with a Legco seat, can you? Like you are being thrown a bone, a bone only but you can’t wait to go get it”, unquote.
Amongst the democrats I’m probably, probably, the one with the least
political baggage: The fact that I do not have a political party background; that I’m not young and as a result I wouldn’t need to worry too much about career development or prospects. And so perhaps I am more able to consider the “stay or quit” question with an even more free mind.
What’s happened is the number of pro-democracy legislators has already been thinned by legal manoeuvres to oust elected members. But we can perhaps muster just enough votes to deny the pro-government camp absolute control over the council.
Unrepresentative though it is, the council often is not just a talking shop and rubber stamp. It does have some ability to query officials, demand information and make constructive criticism of government proposals and policies. Even when the criticism is not particularly constructive, or some would even call it destructive, it could at least help vent public anger and frustration.
We need opposition voice to at least better health policy, labour rights, pollution, education and public transport problems.
Between now and next September we should be able to show Hongkongers that we can be of value in fighting for their interests. Although the system remains heavily weighted against us, the legislature remains a place where we can stand up, on the spot, against the arrogance and incompetence of the administration.
We don’t just make noise, we carry on to serve as the voice of the people. We shouldn’t become outsiders looking in. We need feet on the ground.
Sure we could be running into a storm without even an umbrella. Things could get painful. It’s so much easier to quit. But to quit would just be taking a placebo line. We cannot pretend the pain is not there, we just need to deal with it, fight it.
The lawmaker capacity does carry a degree of power. Once I called the agriculture and fisheries department, demanding to speak to the department head, saying it’s a matter of utter emergency. What was happening that day was a government wild pig hunting team armed with Remington's was scheduled to go to a village, provoking an unnecessary but possible violent standoff between villagers and animal rights campaigners.
My little intervention was successful. The AFCD head heeded and cancelled the hunting mission that day. And thanks to joint efforts on the civil society and Legco fronts such wild boar hunting squads have now been scrapped altogether.
Another episode that has been lodged in my head involved what happened on August 31 last year. Speculation was rife that there were fatalities inside the Prince Edward MTR station that evening, at the peak of our protest movement. I made a number of official enquiries and subsequently managed to have a face-to-face meet-up with the fire services chief.
Although in the end neither the police nor the fire department could satisfactorily explain the discrepancies in the number of injured and the state of injuries, at the time it was the only way to prompt —- if not force —- the civil servants involved to do their explaining in public, to the media.
It’s experiences of the kind that help to solidify my opinion that democrats should remain on the inside. Because of what we do, a lot of incompetence and hypocrisy, sometimes even some crookedness get exposed.
Beijing loyalists and the pro-government type would keep on politely tip-toeing around issues so as not to offend the authorities, they would keep on spinning mistruths, the democrats can counter that performance.
At a time when Hong Kong is politically, financially going down the tubes, with our young in particular feeling helpless, at a time when hope seems to be dismissed and punishment dealt, when discontent could morph into pure hate and antipathy to the government, democrats should help by not abandoning any battleline.
Anyone who wants to query government policies, draw attention to abuses, obtain information now faces increasing difficulties.
Assembly is restricted. People have to guard their words. Much mainstream media simply reflect official policies and journalists now have to be approved by the police to be treated as such. However inadequate it may be, the legislative council remains a forum for questions and comment, and is widely reported.
And popularly elected legislators in particular have standing which cannot be ignored at home, and they are also focus of foreign inquiry about Hong Kong issues. Journalistic institutions magnify the impact of such individuals who would otherwise find themselves crying in the wilderness, lone voices without a platform. Legco is a platform, however shaky.
If results of an opinion poll —-expected by Tuesday —-commissioned by the Democratic Party tell us to go —- easy, we’ll just pack up.
But Im hoping for the opposite. I for one would want to keep staying on the Legco frontline, standing up for what I believe. Nothing egotistical about it. We will simply take what's left and fight it out.
I’m prepared to take the lesser evil.
XXX
https://www.rthk.hk/radio/radio3/programme/lettertohongkong
stamp feet 在 JUICE Taiwan Facebook 的精選貼文
CLOTTEE by CLOT 春季“點心”系列
📋 MENU #凝結酒樓將在今日於JUICE台北店為您上菜!
🥡 經典點心:每道 NT$1,880
- 燒賣 SIU MAI SS TEE
- 蝦餃 SHRIMP DUMPING SS TEE
- 鳳爪 CHICKEN FOOT SS TEE
🥡 特色小品:每道 NT$1,880
- STAMP SS TEE
- DRAGON SS TEE
- PHOENIX SS TEE
🥡 主廚推薦:每道 NT$2,080
- 腸粉 CHEUNG FUNG LS TEE
- 蘿蔔糕 TURNIP CAKE LS TEE
- 叉燒包 BBQ PORK BUN LS TEE
🥡 每日限量:
- PEN SHIRT - NT$2,580
- DIM SUM SHIRT - NT$2,980
- CHICKEN FEET HOODIE - NT$3,380
- DRAGON PHOENIX ZIP UP JACKET - NT$3,380
🥡 今日特餐:
- STAMP DAD CAP - NT$1,380
- CHICKEN FOOT CUSHION - NT$1,580
- CLOTTEE STAMP MEMO PAD - NT$280
#JUICE台灣官方網店本日下午2點起開放線上訂購
關於 CLOTTEE by CLOT "DIM SUM" 點心系列
中華美食一直以豐富多樣而聞名,飲食文化更可以充分體現出當地的人文文化。飲早茶是廣東人生活中不可或缺的部分,它已不僅僅是吃,更成為了人們聚在一起聯絡感情、社交活動的重要方式。 CLOTTEE by CLOT最新一季以最為代表性的“點心”作為創作靈感,將經典的鳳爪、叉燒包及蒸籠等元素融合其中,通過本地飲食元素來傳達CLOTTEE的街頭語言及獨有的港式風格。
CLOTTEE by CLOT SP20“點心”系列以經典街頭版型為藍本,運用了更為明亮活潑的色彩,將點心圖案印於T卹、衛衣上。其中茶餐廳員工服風格的短袖襯衫也是一大亮點,輕薄閒逸的版型,背後印著大酒樓字樣,前胸口袋處夾著點單的圓珠筆,加以口袋處的溢墨設計,等你穿上便是CLOTTEE大酒樓的頭號“伙計”!
CLOTTEE系列造型圖邀請到陳冠希的rapper好友-Chef廚房仔出鏡。選址於傳統的中式餐廳,重點聚焦在點心及早茶元素上。 CLOTTEE不僅是在向中華美食、人文文化的豐富多彩致敬。更是希望在不久的未來,能通過飲早茶這一生活方式,重新拉近社交距離。在閒暇時光,去坐在一起,去關心你身邊的人。
stamp feet 在 Harper baby 小哈潑的日常 Facebook 的最讚貼文
一直跟我說「馬麻你angry!」,然後就學我講話 😂 好好笑喔我一直注意到她肥肥的身體~~~ 哈哈哈哈哈哈,好可愛!每次假裝angry都會配合說stamp your feet,之前有跟我說是teacher Casey教的 😍
小哈潑真的覺得上學很好玩 ❤️ 謝謝老師們給她一個歡樂又有趣的環境!讓她每天把在學校觀察到的東西帶回來分享給我們 😄 她真的每天每天都有新的,有時候是新學到的歌、英文、手指謠、甚至生活習慣和小道理 🥰
stamp feet 在 Elephant Foot Stamp - Facebook 的必吃
Elephant Foot Stamp. 59 likes. Elephant Foot Stamp app gives you access to digital stamp cards, from all your favorite brands in one place. ... <看更多>