關於 missing promise ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

🥈🇹🇼小戴🇹🇼🥈 #戴資穎 💕愛你
金牌戰 最漂亮的落點

8月歌單【好事自在Latte】
08/31星期二
14:04:09Run/One Republic
14:06:53無樂不作/范逸臣
14:11:36愛到站了/李千娜
14:15:11淚光閃閃/黃品源
14:19:37Week End/星野 源
14:26:27搖落/兄弟本色
14:32:09Ordinary People/John Legend
14:36:40怪自己太特別/巴奈
14:44:36Waterfalls/TLC
14:49:01給你抱抱/李玖哲
14:53:20受夠/周興哲

15:04:05愛情限時批/伍佰/萬芳
15:07:43Nobody Wants To Be Lonely/Ricky Martin/Christina Agulera
15:11:46猜猜/張語噥/Barry Chan
15:16:24第三人稱/蔡依林
15:21:02流浪狗/李泉/范曉萱
15:25:24Super Shine/EXILE 放浪兄弟
15:34:08Queendom/Red Velvet
15:38:12我要的幸福/孫燕姿
15:41:38彩虹/動力火車
15:48:01Save Me - Don't Break Me/Modern Talking
15:52:50煙火/陳綺貞

16:04:06相思成災/劉德華
16:08:44如果那天/林凡
16:12:04LATATA/(G)I-DLE
16:17:10Someone Over The Rainbow/許哲珮/莫子儀
16:21:05值得被珍惜/周蕙
16:25:40Don't Go Breaking My Heart/Backstreet Boys
16:31:33Always On My Mind/Pet Shop Boys
16:36:32聽見下雨的聲音/魏如昀
16:40:57台北下了雪/徐若瑄
16:48:22笑一個/浩角翔起
16:52:00Cha Cha Cha/Humo feat Josef
16:55:23失戀陣線聯盟/草蜢

08/30星期一
14:04:00Rehab/Amy Winehouse
14:07:55十二生肖/王力宏
14:12:59我還是一個人/黃偉晉
14:17:18我美麗的愛情/許慧欣
14:22:03Love On The Weekend/John Mayer
14:29:35小情歌/倖田來未
14:34:45急不來的，就讓它慢吧/ 蔡佩軒
14:38:02愛一個人好難/蘇永康
14:45:06Where Are We Now/MAMAMOO
14:48:46HAVE A NICE DAY/魏如萱
14:53:39老實情人/鼓鼓 呂思緯

15:04:14批/蘇明淵
15:08:50阿峰今天沒有來/萬芳
15:13:44Whole World Around/Daniel Powter
15:21:06一起去跑步/宇宙人
15:26:07Twenty-three/IU
15:32:52吃定我/吳是閎
15:36:46如果我變成回憶/TANK
15:43:20When They Come For Me/Linkin Park
15:48:10One by one oh We're Gonna Die/Tizzy Bac
15:53:07怎麼了/周興哲

16:03:56今晚我是你的DJ/鄺美雲
16:08:15Superwoman/曹格
16:13:14I'm your dog/平井堅
16:17:59愛的動名片/安心亞
16:21:17Luv Me/AOA
16:24:45媽媽說/周渝民
16:32:05那年夏天寧靜的海/王心凌
16:36:12有一種愛叫等待/邱鋒澤
16:40:34Cherry/Harry Styles
16:46:58大俠艾吃漢堡包/艾成
16:50:48不吃早餐才是一件很嘻哈的事/MC HotDog
16:55:13速食餐/素食搖滾客FAST

08/27星期五
14:04:09早安，晨之美/盧廣仲
14:07:57我的Super Life/錦繡二重唱
14:11:14Beautiful soul/Jesse McCartney
14:16:27其實你並沒那麼孤單/周興哲
14:19:20Young And Beautiful/Lana Del Rey
14:23:10總要/巴奈
14:31:32The Beat Goes On/SUPER JUNIOR-D&E
14:35:43浪費/文慧如
14:40:24我們都有問題/蛋堡/N.CHEN
14:47:31你的宇宙/宇宙人
14:52:27You're Not Sorry/Taylor Swift

15:04:05我愛過/江蕙
15:08:48倒回愛/孫梓菱
15:13:00Can't Stop/CNBLUE
15:18:59兩秒終/周湯豪
15:22:36Your Body/Christina Aguilera
15:30:59寂寞沙洲冷/周傳雄
15:35:30我們沒有愛錯/潘嘉麗
15:41:33Thriller/Michael Jackson
15:49:53The Rose Song/Olivia Rodrigo
15:53:46全部都給你/吳克群

16:04:03訂做一個他/黃韻玲
16:07:30My Dear/Red Velvet
16:11:00BOOGIE/吳建豪
16:17:11等一個人/林芯儀
16:21:18想念你的歌/Saya
16:26:16It Will Rain/Bruno Mars
16:33:11Just A Little Bit/Claudia
16:38:38你怎麼可以安心的睡著/戴佩妮
16:41:21想要膩在一起/曾昱嘉
16:48:24玩家/曹楊/派偉俊
16:51:49SPOTLIGHT/頑童MJ116
16:55:21I'm Ready/Sam Smith

08/26星期四
14:04:08倒數/陳綺貞
14:07:57Time after time/Ronan Keating
14:12:02戀戀/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
14:17:18忘了愛/范逸臣
14:22:11IF YOU/BIGBANG
14:26:29不營業日常/劉若英
14:34:50Picture Perfect/Chris Brown
14:40:10尋人啟事/徐佳瑩
14:44:35演員和歌手/李榮浩/陳坤
14:51:03忘記你/派偉俊/Tyson Yo
14:54:59MUSIC/moumoon

15:04:07什麼時候她/李英宏
15:08:58Love Isn't Easy/ABBA
15:11:43Hands on Me/少女時代-太妍
15:18:30一夜情/張惠妹
15:23:33I Wanna Be That Girl/Leona Lewis
15:27:37壞米仔/楊士弘/屁孩 Rya
15:34:42夏天的午後是鈷藍色/Awesome City
15:38:53我比從前想你了/Bii畢書盡
15:43:29空港/戴愛玲
15:49:06How Would It Be/Lene Marlin
15:54:07蠢蛋/八三夭

16:04:06真心/葉蒨文
16:08:00Eternity/Robbie Williams
16:12:55每月5號/汪蘇瀧
16:18:24Only One/順子
16:23:11怎樣/張三李四/呂薔
16:27:40Find You/Zedd/Matthew
16:35:34How Can I Love You/金俊秀
16:40:57真相大白/卓文萱
16:47:16娛樂無限公司/Ella 陳嘉樺
16:50:50In Your Arms/Backstreet Boys
16:54:28紅粉寶貝/汪佩蓉

08/25星期三
14:04:31愛人錯過/告五人
14:09:14It's Time/Imagine Dragons
14:13:06雙節棍/周杰倫
14:18:06情歌/陳珊妮
14:22:38我不需要/邱振哲
14:27:04謝謝我的愛/NCT DREAM
14:33:25我是你的fan/春艷/薩麥爾
14:37:38海枯石爛/Olivia Ong
14:41:23兩顆星紀念日/大塚 愛
14:48:18Clocks/Coldplay
14:54:27快樂天堂/劉若英

15:04:12繁華攏是夢/琳誼
15:08:01我不難過/孫燕姿
15:12:54Fool's Gold/One Direction
15:18:33Saturday/陳卓
15:21:38留給你的我從未/甜約翰/壞特
15:25:40my kind of girl/Michael Buble
15:34:48Rumors/Lizzo/Cardi B
15:38:47換日線/張智成
15:45:34愛情從告白開始/金範秀
15:49:10我不再怕/梁心頤
15:53:17天真世界的叛徒/理想混蛋

16:03:56短髮/梁詠琪
16:08:26其實都沒有/楊宗緯
16:12:09Everybody knows/John Legend
16:18:52I Love U So/Jinbo
16:22:23ANY SONG/ZICO
16:26:08藏不住/By2/MP 魔幻力量
16:34:03UP!/Shania Twain
16:38:23心如刀割/張學友
16:45:35Yes I do/Supper Moment
16:50:21旅行公路/小男孩樂團
16:53:59Together/MONKEY MAJIK

08/24星期二
14:04:39不上班/李千娜
14:07:56上班族On The Beach/Porno Graffitti
14:12:06今世世界紀錄/旺福
14:15:49下一首情歌/吳建豪
14:19:39愛笑的眼睛/徐若瑄
14:24:00Cheek To Cheek/Lady Gaga
14:30:30WAIT/瘦子E.SO
14:34:39怎麼能這樣/曾沛慈
14:39:29耀眼如星/K.Will
14:44:57狂風裡擁抱/信/A-Lin
14:50:40Tonight's The Night/Janet Jackson
14:55:42不好說/張三李四

15:04:57毋驚差幾歲/張涵雅
15:08:48真愛冒險/張韶涵
15:12:41If I Can't Have You/Shawn Mendes
15:18:00微笑分手/邱鋒澤
15:22:14一笑而過/那英
15:26:42Broken Strings/James Morrison
15:35:26DUMB DUMB/Somi
15:38:58突然心動/陳曉東
15:43:48凝視/閻奕格
15:50:07安和/蘇慧倫
15:55:07Try Me/安室奈美惠

16:04:06明天我要嫁給你/周華健
16:07:31Never Worn White/Katy Perry
16:11:11巧柯力/柯有倫/汪小敏
16:16:40I PROMISE YOU/Wanna One
16:20:55TRUE LOVE/Coldplay
16:24:55看見聽見/戴佩妮
16:33:35Beautiful days/Love Psychedelico
16:38:12對不起 我愛你/梁靜茹
16:42:42耳朵/李榮浩
16:48:43Higher/吳卓源
16:52:22Hey Boy/Sia
16:54:50我的時代/MC HotDog/張震嶽

08/23星期一
2:04:57 100萬/Crispy脆樂團
2:08:12 Million Dollar Bill/Whitney Houston
2:11:32貧民百萬歌星/MC HotDog
2:17:03愛在黎明破曉時/郭蘅祈
2:21:22 U/MC THE MAX
2:25:30對我好一點/江美琪
2:33:28還是要有長頸鹿才能/沒有才能
2:37:50 Everything/黃小琥
2:44:37當一個天使的憂愁/Erika 劉艾立/小宇 宋念宇
2:51:36 Crush on/李浩瑋
2:54:35 Last Days Of Disco/Robbie Williams

3:04:12仙山苦命郎/新寶島康樂隊
3:09:26 Leave Me Alone/Santana
3:13:17沒有醜女人/順子
3:18:19健康就好/劉思涵
3:23:02 Beautiful/Crush
3:26:40愛的飛行日記/周杰倫/楊瑞代
3:35:04讓浪漫作主/蔡健雅
3:40:11 No Matter What/Boyzone
3:46:48就讓這首歌/張?嶽/熱狗/侯佩岑
3:51:38 SIMPLE IS BEST/矢井田瞳

4:03:56靠近/庾澄慶
4:08:47心宇宙/王詩安
4:11:54 Baby I love you/Che'Nelle
4:17:52主打歌/屁孩 Ryan/rgry,
4:21:50 L.O.V.E./Jessie J
4:27:29吾愛無愛/白安
4:31:50背影/林宥嘉
4:38:47換季/SUPER JUNIOR
4:44:38 I have a Dream/Connie Talbot
4:49:05現在就出發/品冠
4:52:54愛的叮咚/徐懷鈺

08/20星期五
2:04:47賴床公主/ Lulu黃路梓茵
2:08:05 For the First Time in Forever/Kristen Bell
2:11:44永遠在一起/許哲珮
2:16:56該我的愛/陳小春
2:21:16孔雀魚/傅健穎
2:25:02 Story of My Life/One Direction
2:31:16 Moving On/BTS 防彈少年團
2:37:13 MY WAY/平井堅
2:42:51愛要有你才完美/那英
2:49:54 Angeline/陶吉吉
2:54:45任何形狀/DAPUN大胖/陳思涵

3:04:34若是明仔載/曹雅雯/壞特
3:08:15 Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word/Mary J. Blige
3:11:53 Why You Gonna Lie/高爾宣
3:16:43 Good People/Jack Johnson
3:20:04最初的起點/陳綺貞
3:22:41安九/老王樂隊
3:31:48藍天/張惠妹
3:35:56一切都會過去的/蔡明仁
3:40:52有什麼關係/FUNKY MONKEY BABY
3:48:16不好意思/Jelly Cookie
3:51:13你好/王大文
3:54:42小清新/四葉草

4:04:14穿過妳的黑髮的我的手/羅大佑
4:07:28我這個人/艾怡良
4:12:07 Whatever We Started/Richard Marx
4:18:06伯父/瘦子E.SO
4:21:07 Call you tonight/Whitney Houston
4:29:23不如這樣/陳奕迅
4:33:57是不是我還不夠好/莊鵑瑛
4:41:45復活LOVE/嵐
4:48:55愛她沒的救/杜德偉/品冠/曹格
4:52:48 Shake It/Sistar
4:56:16 Champagne Problems/Meghan Trainor

08/19星期四
14:04:36得獎的是/自由發揮
14:07:57All The Things/Pitbull/INNA
14:11:19我就是喜歡我這樣/蔡佩軒
14:16:16千千萬萬個你/周蕙
14:20:40你就像個小孩/阿杜
14:25:07SURVIVOR/Daniel Powter
14:30:35I'm Real/Jennifer Lopez
14:36:33追光者/岑寧兒
14:40:13她要我她不愛我/任賢齊
14:47:19一天/YELLOW 黃宣
14:51:25How People Move/AKMU 樂童音樂家
14:54:41給他/郭采潔

15:04:05噶瑪蘭的風吹飛懸懸/楊肅浩
15:08:23故鄉普悠瑪/陳建年
15:14:56Pieces of me/Ashlee Simpson
15:21:52Doin' Time/Lana Del Rey
15:25:08那個男孩/張三李四
15:29:06給你抱抱/李玖哲
15:37:02什麼來著/大塚 愛
15:41:35誰來陪我唱完這首歌/曹格
15:48:35ALWAYS/Wanna One
15:53:55女人多可愛/彭佳慧

16:04:08愛得比較深/陳淑樺
16:09:02Mercy/Shawn Mendes
16:12:32醜人多作怪/告五人
16:18:34Crowd Go Crazy/John Legend
16:21:32你點的歌救了我/A-Lin/J.Sheon
16:27:38量力而為/蘇慧倫
16:32:04熟悉/庾澄慶
16:39:12口紅的傳言/柴崎幸
16:49:00Too Many Beautiful Girls/SUPER JUNIOR
16:52:18小男人大男孩/蕭敬騰
16:55:50祝你開心/孫燕姿

08/18星期三
14:03:59腦公/蔡依林
14:06:46Devil/SUPER JUNIOR
14:11:55點點/魏暉倪
14:16:05東風破/周杰倫
14:21:13Bop Bop Baby/Westlife
14:29:47通勤打理/呂士軒
14:34:08魚/陳綺貞
14:38:49How Would You Feel/Ed Sheeran
14:45:47赤裸裸的心/Aimyon
14:50:30不搖滾/八三夭/房東的貓
14:56:15自由靈魂/梁心頤

15:04:14一世人的代誌/浩子
15:07:55Won't Go Home Without You/Maroon 5
15:11:54壞壞惹人愛/戴愛玲/信
15:18:35修煉愛情/林俊傑
15:23:10記得要忘記/S.H.E
15:30:14I Get a Kick Out of You/Lady Gaga
15:34:50零/柯有倫
15:39:30 Break Me Down/Marz23/JESSE
15:51:04自由的依靠/PIA吳蓓雅
15:54:57沒什麼大不了/Sweet Sorrow

16:03:59猜心/萬芳
16:08:40來不及說再見/劉學甫/許莉潔
16:13:03Linger/The Cranberries
16:19:29如果可以/9m88
16:23:48我心中尚未崩壞的地方/黃韻玲
16:28:25today is yesterday`s tomorrow/Michael Buble
16:34:21WHY DON'T WE/Rain/請夏
16:40:03在你身邊/韋禮安
16:43:31夢醒了/那英/王菲
16:49:51我的未來不是夢/茄子蛋
16:52:36靜止/楊乃文
16:55:52All of your life/Backstreet

08/17星期二
14:04:36Candy/Robbie Williams
14:07:49幸福氧氣/卓文萱
14:11:41加油/Teem Never Stop
14:17:02好嗎今天/袁婭維
14:21:34Bleeding Love/Leona Lewis
14:26:02Miss逃脫/蔣卓嘉
14:31:39我的事不關你的事/賴慈泓/孫盛希
14:35:57One In A Million/Ne-Yo
14:46:42有一天我會/蔡淳佳
14:51:53All Love/三代目 J SOUL Brothers

15:04:41我愛的就是你/蕭煌奇
15:08:34我又初戀了/五月天
15:12:24Cross My Mind/Twin Forks
15:17:57抱一個/曹雅雯
15:22:07有故事的人/周華健
15:26:34Gotta be you/One Direction
15:33:50Blanket/SURAN
15:38:24離心力/楊乃文
15:43:35信鴿/郭富城
15:49:56Millionaire/Cash Cash/Nelly
15:54:06再見錯的人/徐若瑄

16:04:08愚人碼頭/熊天平
16:09:09無香之水/彭佳慧
16:13:48Bottom of the ocean/Miley Cyrus
16:19:04夏夕夏景/旺福
16:22:16Summer Day/V6
16:29:36茉莉花/梁靜茹
16:34:34滯留鋒/理想混蛋
16:42:21Time And Again/A-Ha
16:49:30公主病/KIMBERLEY 陳芳語
16:52:35Say It Right/Nelly Furtado
16:56:11Face/GOT7

08/16星期一
14:04:00邊吃巧克力邊倒立/瑞瑪席丹
14:07:391234567/方大同
14:11:18You Don't Know What To Do/Mariah Carey
14:17:41光陰獨白/徐佳瑩
14:20:49一直給/嚴爵
14:26:03Melt My Heart/Eric Nam
14:32:08What I Like About You/Jonas Blue
14:36:49踮起腳尖愛/洪佩瑜
14:41:24回憶裡的瘋狂/光良
14:47:27Just Do Me /葛仲珊
14:53:08HURRY HOME/SoulJa

15:04:14遠近/廖文強
15:08:18我又想起你/江美琪
15:12:54All That I Need/Boyzone
15:20:44It's 2020/春艷
15:22:48B.O./OZI/9m88
15:26:39Forever/Chris Brown
15:34:24縱橫四海/李榮浩
15:39:20很愛很愛你/鄭秀文
15:43:38想你/孝琳
15:49:13愛在蔓延時/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
15:55:12Cutie Honey甜心戰士/倖田來未

16:03:59原來你什麼都不要/張惠妹
16:08:39千年以後/陳零九
16:13:16Lost In Japan/Shawn Mendes
16:18:10ihateyou1000/Karencici
16:20:06愛我不愛/蕭亞軒
16:23:28CALIFORNIA GIRLS/Katy Perry
16:31:27下一個天亮/郭靜
16:35:37愛情廢柴/周杰倫
16:42:59Rock With You/Michael Jackson
16:50:10Thunderclouds/LSD
16:53:23迷幻/蔡依林
16:56:50Candy Boy/TWICE

08/13星期五
14:04:09美少女/舒米恩
14:07:37姊姊 妳太美了Replay/SHINee
14:14:49我為什麼那麼愛你/張惠妹
14:19:37你有沒有更快樂/陳勢安
14:23:24I Choose You/Sara Bareilles
14:31:11愛吃味/呂士軒
14:36:12暖心/郁可唯
14:40:13The Freedom Song/Jason Mraz
14:46:29大發現/東京事變
14:52:12滿座/李榮浩

15:04:05志明與春嬌/五月天
15:08:39Me & You Together Song/The 1975
15:14:21能不能想起我/鄧福如
15:18:58這樣美好的理由/梁多一
15:23:01微光/黃義達
15:32:43性感肥宅/DAPUN 大胖/方Q
15:37:19德國下雪了/許哲珮
15:42:19L'Amoureuse 戀愛中的女人/Carla Bruni
15:47:18上帝的幫助/陳信安
15:52:16櫻花森林/星野 源

16:04:08一起看月亮/杜德偉
16:09:12Fallen/Lauren Wood
16:12:51寶貝好壞/馬念先
16:18:09句號/鄧紫棋
16:22:01Whatever It Takes/Imagine Dragons
16:29:33秋天別來/侯湘婷
16:33:54想念/Henry 劉憲華
16:38:16最美的時刻/伍佰& China Blue
16:44:46愛不愛我/大嘴巴
16:48:24kiss you feat. L.O.W.D./EXILE 放浪兄弟
16:54:27Faded/Alan Walker

08/12星期四
14:04:49Next To You/Chris Brown
14:09:11第一頁/張韶涵
14:16:10話題/周蕙
14:20:48只有妳/SUPER JUNIOR-始源
14:24:56理由/林憶蓮
14:33:35Woo Hoo/Christina Aguilera
14:40:06給我一個理由忘記/A-Lin
14:44:42暫時的記號/林俊傑
14:50:59安和/蘇慧倫
14:55:07Smile/柚子

15:04:07阿喜A車車/新寶島康樂隊
15:08:42More Than A Woman/911
15:15:02寧靜海/吳青峰
15:19:21氧氣/范曉萱
15:23:44捲捲頭/10CM
15:31:27Angels/春野
15:35:02不得不愛/潘瑋柏/弦子
15:40:43早上papapa/J.Sheon
15:45:41矜持/蕭敬騰
15:50:51忘不記/家家
15:55:12Boyfriend/Ashlee Simpson

16:04:06為什麼你背著我愛別人/許志安
16:08:58嘴硬(當我說不愛你)/朱俐靜
16:13:14This Is The Last Time/Keane
16:18:45Total Eclipse Of The Heart/Westlife
16:23:16溫蒂公主的侍衛/告五人
16:31:33可是我們呢/林凡
16:34:55藉口/周杰倫
16:40:17Never Growing Old/The Cranberries
16:48:33愛上陌生人/廖柏雅
16:52:06I Love You/Axwell
16:55:14Don't fight the feeling/EXO

08/11星期三
14:04:02速食全餐/許書豪
14:07:39I want you back/方大同
14:11:46It's like that/Mariah Carey
14:18:46有你的日常/PIA吳蓓雅
14:22:59忘了愛/范逸臣
14:27:55Sweety/酷懶之味
14:36:05Try/P!nk
14:41:11透明/劉若英
14:43:43一念之間/陶吉吉
14:50:38讓我們在一起吧/Lulu黃路梓茵
14:54:45本性難移/Kick The Can Crew

15:04:12阿爸/周杰倫/洪榮宏
15:08:32Because You Loved Me/Celine Dion
15:12:59酒鬼/李英宏
15:19:28The Seasons/CNBLUE
15:23:11天亮/曾寶儀
15:32:54Kiss My/Anne-Marie
15:36:52又不是這樣就不孤獨/嚴爵
15:49:20變形金剛/魏如萱
15:53:36LADY-GO-ROUND/B'z

16:04:01用情/張信哲
16:09:02阿峰今天沒有來/萬芳
16:13:46No Fear/Greyson Chance
16:19:23你留給我的遺憾無以名狀/理想混蛋 雞丁
16:23:12I'm Not Missing/Stacie Orrico
16:31:00第一個清晨/王力宏
16:35:32Flower/尹美萊
16:40:44我會醬子嗎/曹格
16:46:22What The Hell/Avril Lavigne
16:50:03百年孤寂/胖虎樂團
16:54:17給自己的歌/小男孩樂團

08/10星期二
14:05:00由我們主宰/大合唱
14:07:59好多好多/大塚 愛
14:11:31怎麼辦/S.H.E
14:17:58可惜了/彭佳慧
14:22:19人海中遇見你/林育群
14:26:06Stop Standing There/Avril Lavigne
14:33:32千年戀歌/東方神起
14:37:25愛上現在的我/閻奕格/高爾宣
14:41:43如果沒有你/莫文蔚
14:52:08在我成為井井有條的大人之前/郭采潔
14:56:11ORDINARY WORLD/Green Day

15:04:07雨咧落/鍾明軒
15:07:18只愛陌生人/許茹芸
15:11:49Talk To Me/ZAYN
15:16:52街角的祝福/戴佩妮
15:20:52櫻/中 孝介/河口恭吾
15:25:06愛你需要練習/品冠/薇婭
15:33:42NAKKA/AKMU 樂童音樂家/IU
15:38:18忘了我也不錯/王心凌
15:42:40少年/周華健
15:48:33眷戀/順子
15:52:37 Thanks for the Love/周湯豪

16:04:06我願意/王菲
16:08:27諷刺的情書/田馥甄
16:12:24TELEPHONE/James Blunt
16:17:18我就是喜歡我這樣/蔡佩軒
16:20:23玩遊戲/韋禮安
16:24:30Breathless/The Corrs
16:31:53到時再分手就好/ROY KIM
16:35:56好難得/丁噹
16:40:01Be The One/Bii畢書盡/李玉壐/陳以彥允
16:46:15我愛夏卡爾/江美琪
16:50:00Snow Dance/Dreams Come True
16:54:23沒感覺/宇宙人

08/09星期一
14:04:02紅蓮華/LiSA
14:07:53再出發/任賢齊/阿牛
14:12:32We Are/小男孩樂團
14:19:22祝我幸福/家家
14:23:44我會在這裡/BTOB
14:28:20誰/盧凱彤
14:35:41We've Got It Going On/Backstreet
14:40:27鯨落/林采欣
14:46:42Want To Want Me/Jason Derulo
14:50:06TAIPEI/Ponzii劉昊
14:54:23愛的海洋/曲婉婷

15:04:12親愛的美惠/張涵雅
15:07:10只有我看得見/10CM
15:09:45愛的詩篇/梁文音
15:17:07濕眠/KIMBERLEY 陳芳語
15:19:56DONE FOR ME/Charlie Puth
15:22:48壞蛋特調/J.Sheon
15:31:36白飯/leo王
15:34:55夏的季節/張清芳/林子良
15:40:27成為一家人吧/福山雅治
15:47:16You Owe Me Nothing In Retune/Alanis
15:53:17天空/元衞覺醒

16:04:01絲路/齊秦
16:08:11留給你的愛/吳汶芳
16:12:46Double Jack/BoA
16:18:13HIT IT/The Black Eyed Peas
16:21:45電司/Lollipop F
16:25:49臉盲症/安心亞
16:32:53一點點/林宥嘉
16:37:26知難而退/劉思涵/郁可唯
16:42:14太陽無用/Orange Range
16:46:18浪費時間/9m88
16:50:29那我先/孫盛希/呂士軒
16:54:35Send My Love/Adele

08/06星期五
14:04:48王子麵/五月天/孫燕姿
14:08:58超完美極品/安心亞
14:11:58Up In The Air/Thirty Seconds To Mars
14:18:15單人房雙人床/莫文蔚
14:22:51在我們忘記之前/廖文強
14:26:53Girls are back/少女時代
14:33:0188的車/春艷
14:35:48scream & shout/will.i.am
14:41:37我很好，那麼你呢/王心凌
14:52:00上海一九四三/周杰倫
14:56:20口紅的傳言/柴崎幸

15:04:07博杯/江蕙
15:08:56I LOVE YOU/堂本剛
15:13:23在名為未來的波浪裡/原子邦妮
15:19:19左右違法/李芷婷
15:23:14ONE SHOT, TWO SHOT/BoA
15:26:41Super Nice Girl/周湯豪
15:33:06救世主/動力火車
15:38:31承認/辛曉琪
15:43:08LOVE IS STILL THE ANSWER/Jason Mraz
15:51:08晚點開竅/文慧如
15:54:58She Makes Me Happy/Rod Stewart

16:04:03健康歌/范曉萱/楊峻榮
16:06:53先不要/陳漢典
16:10:13I Want You Back/Bananarama
16:15:40直到永久/MISIA
16:17:03好好唱歌/黃小琥
16:20:47王妃/蕭敬騰
16:27:13What Lovers Do/Maroon 5
16:30:26差不多姑娘/鄧紫棋
16:35:17我不/侯湘婷
16:43:24小人國/小人
16:46:42Flamingo/米津玄師
16:49:57自成一派/鄧福如
16:52:55Hot Times不要考驗/S.M. The Ballad

08/05星期四
14:04:09一個便當/盧廣仲
14:07:29 擱淺的鯨魚/Tizzy Bac
14:11:49友情-上等牛肉花/松浦亞彌
14:17:22如果我變成回憶/TANK
14:22:02 Touch Love/尹美來
14:26:12阿喜A車車/新?島康樂隊
14:33:18Pa Ti/Jennifer Lopez
14:37:0來個蹦蹦/玖壹壹/Ella 陳嘉樺
14:41:20愛我的人和我愛的人/游鴻明
14:51:46兄弟你說/草爺
14:55:23One Flesh/Do As Infinity

15:04:05小姐請你乎我愛/梁文音/六甲樂團
15:07:20KESI/Camilo/Shawn Mendes
15:10:13Sunny Day/李玟
15:17:59生日快樂/劉若英
15:21:20Somewhere Someday/成始境
15:25:44有人在嗎/邱鋒澤
15:33:01仍舊小黑魚/持田香織
15:38:01歇斯底里/林宥嘉
15:43:45十七/S.H.E
15:50:34Guts Over Fear/Eminem/Sia
15:55:32假高潮/Spark/Karencici

16:04:09用心良苦/張宇
16:08:33愛在蔓延時/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
16:13:25Pour Some Sugar On Me/Tom Cruise
16:18:31敢愛就來/Erika 劉艾立
16:22:22DAYA/王艷薇
16:25:07Together/Pet Shop Boys
16:31:14親愛的/徐若瑄
16:36:10想你了/光良
16:41:30La La La...為了你/SS501
16:47:22靜止/楊乃文
16:50:52SKYWALKER/怕胖團
16:54:45In Your Arms/Backstreet Boys

08/04星期三
14:04:00雨劈哩啪啦下/宮閣
14:07:35呼吸 /J.Sheon
14:10:47RAIN ON ME/Lady Gaga
14:15:05忽然/韋禮安
14:19:35哭笑不得/柯有倫
14:23:58Let's Love/David Guetta/Sia
14:29:38七十億分之一加一/吳卓源/婁峻碩
14:33:04O -正.反.合./東方神起
14:38:26是時候/孫燕姿
14:47:18今天是情人節/莊鵑瑛
14:54:06上班族On The Beach/Porno Graffitti 色情塗鴉

15:04:14追追追/黃妃
15:08:52Get on your boots/U2
15:12:14來互相傷害/八三夭/A-Lin
15:17:40明天愛誰/容祖兒
15:22:14陣雨Sudden Rain/Eric Nam
15:26:33我焦慮就會一直碎碎念/深白色二人組
15:33:07Hot Summer/Prince
15:36:3280年代/1976
15:41:49給電影人的情書/蔡琴
15:48:28Always/中島美嘉
15:54:41WAIT/瘦子E.SO

16:03:56冰雨/劉德華
16:08:24BREATHE/李遐怡
16:13:01我就奇怪/魚丁糸
16:17:45差不多先生/MC HotDog熱狗
16:22:09Beautiful/Snoop dogg
16:26:55不解釋親吻/蕭亞軒
16:33:31滯留鋒/理想混蛋
16:38:30如果你也聽說/張惠妹
16:44:43怪物/星野 源
16:49:17I saw her standing there/The Beatles
16:52:10小護士/五月天
16:54:52Party Days/魏如昀

08/03星期二
14:04:36PEACOCK/Katy Perry
14:08:24妙妙妙/徐懷鈺
14:11:40檸檬甜甜的/何維健
14:16:59如果你愛我/艾怡良
14:20:52愛在蔓延時/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
14:25:44For You/Rita Ora/Liam Panne
14:31:41是在哈囉/屁孩 Ryan/rgry
14:34:43 (I Could Have) Danced All Night/Rip Slyme
14:39:24我是幸福的/梁靜茹
14:50:30美好的你/CNBLUE
14:54:20讓我們在一起吧/Lulu黃路梓茵

15:04:05I wanna be your girl/曹雅雯
15:07:22Say That You Love Me/AK 柿原朱美
15:12:54You'll Never Know/J.Sheon
15:17:56Paradise/Beyond
15:22:05Girl At Home/Taylor Swift
15:25:39什麼歌/五月天
15:32:32Talk !/ oceanfromtheblue
15:36:22Fever/吳卓源
15:41:13小鎮姑娘/陶吉吉
15:47:33獨上C樓/YELLOW 黃宣/范曉萱
15:51:20Ghetto Love/Macy Gray
15:54:18獨領風騷/杜德偉

16:04:08糖果/藍心湄
16:09:31戀愛漢堡/大塚 愛/AKKOGOR
16:12:53感應心電/張立昂
16:18:53眼淚博物館/鄭興
16:23:36想幸福的人/楊丞琳
16:27:59To Be With You/Mr.Big
16:33:43新世界/告五人/阿爆
16:37:28GOLD/Wanna One
16:42:12原諒我/蕭敬騰
16:48:10Sway/Pussycat Dolls Pussycat Dolls
16:51:20哈你歌/庾澄慶/小S
16:55:23塞車恰恰/旺福

08/02星期一
14:04:24Friends Forever/Puffy
14:08:161，2，3，4 ！/強辯樂團
14:12:12太青春/超克7
14:17:14勇氣/魏嘉瑩/魏如昀
14:21:01少年/光良/曹格
14:25:07I Bet My Life/Imagine Dragons
14:30:28Why You Gonna Lie/高爾宣
14:33:13Never Ever/GOT7
14:37:33哼情歌/謝和弦/徐佳瑩
14:46:42電影/詹森淮
14:50:57日光戀人/許哲珮
14:57:01貓中毒/手越增田

15:04:14風風雨雨這多年/洪敬堯
15:08:42Warwick Avenue/Duffy
15:12:21老友記/李榮浩
15:20:06假如瞳孔有濾鏡/炎亞綸
15:23:19With Love/Hilary Duff
15:26:13渴了/張惠妹
15:32:40請你不要在這鬼叫/蔣卓嘉
15:37:02伯樂/林宥嘉
15:41:29You Are My Everything/Gummy
15:47:01寫一首歌/蛋堡/方大同
15:50:28抱抱/榕幫
15:54:13True Love/P!nk

16:03:56你知不知道/張學友
16:08:02好好/李宣榕
16:11:36From The Day/I Am They
16:16:50無所謂/5566
16:20:55Nobody Else/Backstreet Boys
16:24:25你要不要先回家/吳映潔
16:29:09猜心/方炯鑌
16:34:21為了我道別/DIA
16:40:32態度/1976
16:47:22Save Your Tears/The Weeknd/Ariana Granda
16:50:45糖衣/Matzka/Karencic
16:53:50穿越時空愛上你/自由發揮

這是前些日子爆出已經被加拿大法院接理對藏傳佛教噶舉派法王的訟訴。（加拿大法院鏈接在此：https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/21/09/2021BCSC0939cor1.htm?fbclid=IwAR2FLZlzmUIGTBaTuKPVchEqqngcE3Qy6G_C0TWNWVKa2ksbIYkVJVMQ8f8）

這位法王的桃色事件，我是幾年前才聽到。但，藏傳佛教的高層有這些性醜聞，我已經聽了幾十年。我以前的一位前女友也被一些堪布藉故上她的家摟抱過，也有一些活佛跟她表白。（這不只是她，其他地方我也聽過不少）

這是一個藏傳佛教裡面系統式的問題。

很多時候發生這種事情，信徒和教主往往都是說女方得不到寵而報仇，或者說她們也精神病，或者說她們撒謊。

我不排除有這種可能性，但，多過一位，甚至多位出來指證的時候，我是傾向於相信『沒有那麼巧這麼多有精神病的女人要撒謊來報仇』。

大寶法王的桃色事件，最先吹哨的是一位台灣的在家信徒，第二位是香港的女出家人，現在加拿大又多一位公開舉報上法庭。

對大寶法王信徒來說，這一次的比較麻煩，因為是有孩子的。（關於有孩子的，我早在法王的桃色事件曝光時，就有聽聞）

如果法庭勒令要驗證DNA，這對法王和他的信徒來說，會很尷尬和矛盾，因為做或不做，都死。

你若問我，我覺得『人數是有力量的』，同時我也覺得之後有更多的人站出來，是不出奇的。

我也藉此呼籲各方佛教徒，如果你們真的愛佛教，先別說批判，但如鴕鳥般不討論這些爭議，你是間接害了佛教。

（下面是我從加拿大法院鏈接拷貝下來的內容，當中有很多細節。）

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND

ANALYSIS

A. The Spousal Support Claim in this Case

B. The Test to Amend Pleadings

C. Pleadings in Family Law Cases

D. The Legal Concept of a Marriage-Like Relationship

E. Is There a Reasonable Claim of a Marriage-Like Relationship?

F. Delay / Prejudice

CONCLUSION



INTRODUCTION
[1] The claimant applies to amend her notice of family claim to seek spousal support. At issue is whether the claimant’s allegations give rise to a reasonable claim she lived with the respondent in a marriage-like relationship, so as to give rise to a potential entitlement to spousal support under the Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25 (“FLA”).

[2] The facts alleged by the claimant do not fit within a traditional concept of marriage. The claimant does not allege that she and the respondent ever lived together. Indeed, she has only met the respondent in person four times: twice very briefly in a public setting; a third time in private, when she alleges the respondent sexually assaulted her; and a fourth and final occasion, when she informed the respondent she was pregnant with his child.

[3] The claimant’s case is that what began as a non-consensual sexual encounter evolved into a loving and affectionate relationship. That relationship occurred almost entirely over private text messages. The parties rarely spoke on the telephone, and never saw one another during the relationship, even over video. The claimant says they could not be together because the respondent is forbidden by his station and religious beliefs from intimate relationships or marriage. Nonetheless, she alleges, they formed a marriage-like relationship that lasted from January 2018 to January 2019.

[4] The respondent denies any romantic relationship with the claimant. While he acknowledges providing emotional and financial support to the claimant, he says it was for the benefit of the child the claimant told him was his daughter.

[5] The claimant’s proposed amendment raises a novel question: can a secret relationship that began on-line and never moved into the physical world be like a marriage? In my view, that question should be answered by a trial judge after hearing all of the evidence. The alleged facts give rise to a reasonable claim the claimant lived with the respondent in a marriage-like relationship. Accordingly, I grant the claimant leave to amend her notice of family claim.

BACKGROUND
[6] It should be emphasized that this is an application to amend pleadings only. The allegations by the claimant are presumed to be true for the purposes of this application. Those allegations have not been tested in a court of law.

[7] The respondent, Ogyen Trinley Dorje, is a high lama of the Karma Kagyu School of Tibetan Buddhism. He has been recognized and enthroned as His Holiness, the 17th Gyalwang Karmapa. Without meaning any disrespect, I will refer to him as Mr. Dorje in these reasons for judgment.

[8] Mr. Dorje leads a monastic and nomadic lifestyle. His true home is Tibet, but he currently resides in India. He receives followers from around the world at the Gyuto Monetary in India. He also travels the world teaching Tibetan Buddhist Dharma and hosting pujas, ceremonies at which Buddhists express their gratitude and devotion to the Buddha.

[9] The claimant, Vikki Hui Xin Han, is a former nun of Tibetan Buddhism. Ms. Han first encountered Mr. Dorje briefly at a large puja in 2014. The experience of the puja convinced Ms. Han she wanted to become a Buddhist nun. She met briefly with Mr. Dorje, in accordance with Kagyu traditions, to obtain his approval to become a nun.

[10] In October 2016, Ms. Han began a three-year, three-month meditation retreat at a monastery in New York State. Her objective was to learn the practices and teachings of the Kagyu Lineage. Mr. Dorje was present at the retreat twice during the time Ms. Han was at the monastery.

[11] Ms. Han alleges that on October 14, 2017, Mr. Dorje sexually assaulted her in her room at the monastery. She alleges that she became pregnant from the assault.

[12] After she learned that she was pregnant, Ms. Han requested a private audience with Mr. Dorje. In November 2017, in the presence of his bodyguards, Ms. Han informed Mr. Dorje she was pregnant with his child. Mr. Dorje initially denied responsibility; however, he provided Ms. Han with his email address and a cellphone number, and, according to Ms. Han, said he would “prepare some money” for her.

[13] Ms. Han abandoned her plan to become a nun, left the retreat and returned to Canada. She never saw Mr. Dorje again.

[14] After Ms. Han returned to Canada, she and Mr. Dorje began a regular communication over an instant messaging app called Line. They also exchanged emails and occasionally spoke on the telephone.

[15] The parties appear to have expressed care and affection for one another in these communications. I say “appear to” because it is difficult to fully understand the meaning and intentions of another person from brief text messages, especially those originally written in a different language. The parties wrote in a private shorthand, sharing jokes, emojis, cartoon portraits and “hugs” or “kisses”. Ms. Han was the more expressive of the two, writing more frequently and in longer messages. Mr. Dorje generally participated in response to questions or prompting from Ms. Han, sometimes in single word messages.

[16] Ms. Han deposes that she believed Mr. Dorje was in love with her and that, by January 2018, she and Mr. Dorje were living in a “conjugal relationship”.

[17] During their communications, Ms. Han expressed concern that her child would be “illegitimate”. She appears to have asked Mr. Dorje to marry her, and he appears to have responded that he was “not ready”.

[18] Throughout 2018, Mr. Dorje transferred funds in various denominations to Ms. Han through various third parties. Ms. Han deposes that these funds were:

a) $50,000 CDN to deliver the child and for postpartum care she was to receive at a facility in Seattle;

b) $300,000 CDN for the first year of the child’s life;

c) $20,000 USD for a wedding ring, because Ms. Han wrote “Even if we cannot get married, you must buy me a wedding ring”;

d) $400,000 USD to purchase a home for the mother and child.

[19] On June 19, 2018, Ms. Han gave birth to a daughter in Richmond, B.C.

[20] On September 17, 2018, Mr. Dorje wrote, ”Taking care of her and you are my duty for life”.

[21] Ms. Han’s expectation was that the parties would live together in the future. She says they planned to live together. Those plans evolved over time. Initially they involved purchasing a property in Toronto, so that Mr. Dorje could visit when he was in New York. They also discussed purchasing property in Calgary or renting a home in Vancouver for that purpose. Ms. Han eventually purchased a condominium in Richmond using funds provided by Mr. Dorje.

[22] Ms. Han deposes that the parties made plans for Mr. Dorje to visit her and meet the child in Richmond. In October 2018, however, Mr. Dorje wrote that he needed to “disappear” to Europe. He wrote:

I will definitely find a way to meet her

And you

Remember to take care of yourself if something happens

[23] The final plan the parties discussed, according to Ms. Han, was that Mr. Dorje would sponsor Ms. Han and the child to immigrate to the United States and live at the Kagyu retreat centre in New York State.

[24] In January 2019, Ms. Han lost contact with Mr. Dorje.

[25] Ms. Han commenced this family law case on July 17, 2019, seeking child support, a declaration of parentage and a parentage test. She did not seek spousal support.

[26] Ms. Han first proposed a claim for spousal support in October 2020 after a change in her counsel. Following an exchange of correspondence concerning an application for leave to amend the notice of family claim, Ms. Han’s counsel wrote that Ms. Han would not be advancing a spousal support claim. On March 16, 2020, counsel reversed course, and advised that Ms. Han had instructed him to proceed with the application.

[27] When this application came on before me, the trial was set to commence on June 7, 2021. The parties were still in the process of discoveries and obtaining translations for hundreds of pages of documents in Chinese characters.

[28] At a trial management conference on May 6, 2021, noting the parties were not ready to proceed, Madam Justice Walkem adjourned the trial to April 11, 2022.

ANALYSIS
A. The Spousal Support Claim in this Case
[29] To claim spousal support in this case, Ms. Han must plead that she lived with Mr. Dorje in a marriage-like relationship. This is because only “spouses” are entitled to spousal support, and s. 3 of the Family Law Act defines a spouse as a person who is married or has lived with another person in a marriage-like relationship:

3 (1) A person is a spouse for the purposes of this Act if the person

(a) is married to another person, or

(b) has lived with another person in a marriage-like relationship, and

(i) has done so for a continuous period of at least 2 years, or

(ii) except in Parts 5 [Property Division] and 6 [Pension Division], has a child with the other person.

[30] Because she alleges she has a child with Mr. Dorje, Ms. Han need not allege that the relationship endured for a continuous period of two years to claim spousal support; but she must allege that she lived in a marriage-like relationship with him at some point in time. Accordingly, she must amend the notice of family claim.

B. The Test to Amend Pleadings
[31] Given that the notice of trial has been served, Ms. Han requires leave of the court to amend the notice of family claim: Supreme Court Family Rule 8-1(1)(b)(i).

[32] A person seeking to amend a notice of family claim must show that there is a reasonable cause of action. This is a low threshold. What the applicant needs to establish is that, if the facts pleaded are proven at trial, they would support a reasonable claim. The applicant’s allegations of fact are assumed to be true for the purposes of this analysis. Cantelon v. Wall, 2015 BCSC 813, at para. 7-8.

[33] The applicant’s delay, the reasons for the delay, and the prejudice to the responding party are also relevant factors. The ultimate consideration is whether it would be just and convenient to allow the amendment. Cantelon, at para. 6, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Dale Intermediaries Ltd. et al (1986), 19 B.C.L.R. (3d) 282.

C. Pleadings in Family Law Cases
[34] Supreme Court Family Rules 3-1(1) and 4-1(1) require that a claim to spousal support be pleaded in a notice of family claim in Form F3. Section 2 of Form F3, “Spousal relationship history”, requires a spousal support claimant to check the boxes that apply to them, according to whether they are or have been married or are or have been in a marriage-like relationship. Where a claimant alleges a marriage-like relationship, Form F3 requires that they provide the date on which they began to live together with the respondent in a marriage-like relationship and, where applicable, the date on which they separated. Form F3 does not require a statement of the factual basis for the claim of spousal support.

[35] In this case, Ms. Han seeks to amend the notice of family claim to allege that she and Mr. Dorje began to live in a marriage-like relationship in or around January 2018, and separated in or around January 2019.

[36] An allegation that a person lived with a claimant in a marriage-like relationship is a conclusion of law, not an allegation of fact. Unlike the rules governing pleadings in civil actions, however, the Supreme Court Family Rules do not expressly require family law claimants to plead the material facts in support of conclusions of law.

[37] In other words, there is no express requirement in the Supreme Court Family Rules that Ms. Han plead the facts on which she relies for the allegation she and Mr. Dorje lived in a marriage-like relationship.

[38] Rule 4-6 authorizes a party to demand particulars, and then apply to the court for an order for further and better particulars, of a matter stated in a pleading. However, unless and until she is granted leave and files the proposed amended notice of family claim, Ms. Han’s allegation of a marriage-like relationship is not a matter stated in a pleading.

[39] Ms. Han filed an affidavit in support of her application to amend the notice of family claim. Normally, evidence would not be required or admissible on an application to amend a pleading. However, in the unusual circumstances of this case, the parties agreed I may look to Ms. Han’s affidavit and exhibits for the facts she pleads in support of the allegation of a marriage-like relationship.

[40] Because this is an application to amend - and Ms. Han’s allegations of fact are presumed to be true - I have not considered Mr. Dorje’s responding affidavit.

[41] Relying on affidavit evidence for an application to amend pleadings is less than ideal. It tends to merge and confuse the material facts with the evidence that would be relied on to prove those facts. In a number of places in her affidavit, for example, Ms. Han describes her feelings, impressions and understandings. A person’s hopes and intentions are not normally material facts unless they are mutual or reasonably held. The facts on which Ms. Han alleges she and Mr. Dorje formed a marriage-like relationship are more important for the present purposes than her belief they entered into a conjugal union.

[42] Somewhat unusually, in this case, almost all of the parties’ relevant communications were in writing. This makes it somewhat easier to separate the facts from the evidence; however, as stated above, it is difficult to understand the intentions and actions of a person from brief text messages.

[43] In my view, it would be a good practice for applicants who seek to amend their pleadings in family law cases to provide opposing counsel and the court with a schedule of the material facts on which they rely for the proposed amendment.

D. The Legal Concept of a Marriage-Like Relationship
[44] As Mr. Justice Myers observed in Mother 1 v. Solus Trust Company, 2019 BCSC 200, the concept of a marriage-like relationship is elastic and difficult to define. This elasticity is illustrated by the following passage from Yakiwchuk v. Oaks, 2003 SKQB 124, quoted by Myers J. at para. 133 of Mother 1:

[10] Spousal relationships are many and varied. Individuals in spousal relationships, whether they are married or not, structure their relationships differently. In some relationships there is a complete blending of finances and property - in others, spouses keep their property and finances totally separate and in still others one spouse may totally control those aspects of the relationship with the other spouse having little or no knowledge or input. For some couples, sexual relations are very important - for others, that aspect may take a back seat to companionship. Some spouses do not share the same bed. There may be a variety of reasons for this such as health or personal choice. Some people are affectionate and demonstrative. They show their feelings for their “spouse” by holding hands, touching and kissing in public. Other individuals are not demonstrative and do not engage in public displays of affection. Some “spouses” do everything together - others do nothing together. Some “spouses” vacation together and some spend their holidays apart. Some “spouses” have children - others do not. It is this variation in the way human beings structure their relationships that make the determination of when a “spousal relationship” exists difficult to determine. With married couples, the relationship is easy to establish. The marriage ceremony is a public declaration of their commitment and intent. Relationships outside marriage are much more difficult to ascertain. Rarely is there any type of “public” declaration of intent. Often people begin cohabiting with little forethought or planning. Their motivation is often nothing more than wanting to “be together”. Some individuals have chosen to enter relationships outside marriage because they did not want the legal obligations imposed by that status. Some individuals have simply given no thought as to how their relationship would operate. Often the date when the cohabitation actually began is blurred because people “ease into” situations, spending more and more time together. Agreements between people verifying when their relationship began and how it will operate often do not exist.

[45] In Mother 1, Mr. Justice Myers referred to a list of 22 factors grouped into seven categories, from Maldowich v. Penttinen, (1980), 17 R.F.L. (2d) 376 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), that have frequently been cited in this and other courts for the purpose of determining whether a relationship was marriage-like, at para. 134 of Mother 1:

1. Shelter:

(a) Did the parties live under the same roof?

(b) What were the sleeping arrangements?

(c) Did anyone else occupy or share the available accommodation?

2. Sexual and Personal Behaviour:

(a) Did the parties have sexual relations? If not, why not?

(b) Did they maintain an attitude of fidelity to each other?

(c) What were their feelings toward each other?

(d) Did they communicate on a personal level?

(e) Did they eat their meals together?

(f) What, if anything, did they do to assist each other with problems or during illness?

(g) Did they buy gifts for each other on special occasions?

3. Services:

What was the conduct and habit of the parties in relation to:

(a) preparation of meals;

(b) washing and mending clothes;

(c) shopping;

(d) household maintenance; and

(e) any other domestic services?

4. Social:

(a) Did they participate together or separately in neighbourhood and community activities?

(b) What was the relationship and conduct of each of them toward members of their respective families and how did such families behave towards the parties?

5. Societal:

What was the attitude and conduct of the community toward each of them and as a couple?

6. Support (economic):

(a) What were the financial arrangements between the parties regarding the provision of or contribution toward the necessaries of life (food, clothing, shelter, recreation, etc.)?

(b) What were the arrangements concerning the acquisition and ownership of property?

(c) Was there any special financial arrangement between them which both agreed would be determinant of their overall relationship?

7. Children:

What was the attitude and conduct of the parties concerning children?

[46] In Austin v. Goerz, 2007 BCCA 586, the Court of Appeal cautioned against a “checklist approach”; rather, a court should "holistically" examine all the relevant factors. Cases like Molodowich provide helpful indicators of the sorts of behaviour that society associates with a marital relationship, the Court of Appeal said; however, “the presence or absence of any particular factor cannot be determinative of whether a relationship is marriage-like” (para. 58).

[47] In Weber v. Leclerc, 2015 BCCA 492, the Court of Appeal again affirmed that there is no checklist of characteristics that will be found in all marriages and then concluded with respect to evidence of intentions:

[23] The parties’ intentions – particularly the expectation that the relationship will be of lengthy, indeterminate duration – may be of importance in determining whether a relationship is “marriage-like”. While the court will consider the evidence expressly describing the parties’ intentions during the relationship, it will also test that evidence by considering whether the objective evidence is consonant with those intentions.

[24] The question of whether a relationship is “marriage-like” will also typically depend on more than just their intentions. Objective evidence of the parties’ lifestyle and interactions will also provide direct guidance on the question of whether the relationship was “marriage-like”.

[48] Significantly for this case, the courts have looked to mutual intent in order to find a marriage-like relationship. See, for example, L.E. v. D.J., 2011 BCSC 671 and Buell v. Unger, 2011 BCSC 35; Davey Estate v. Gruyaert, 2005 CarswellBC 3456 at 13 and 35.

[49] In Mother 1, Myers J. concluded his analysis of the law with the following learned comment:

[143] Having canvassed the law relating to the nature of a marriage-like relationship, I will digress to point out the problematic nature of the concept. It may be apparent from the above that determining whether a marriage-like relationship exists sometimes seems like sand running through one's fingers. Simply put, a marriage-like relationship is akin to a marriage without the formality of a marriage. But as the cases mentioned above have noted, people treat their marriages differently and have different conceptions of what marriage entails.

[50] In short, the determination of whether the parties in this case lived in a marriage-like relationship is a fact-specific inquiry that a trial judge would need to make on a “holistic” basis, having regard to all of the evidence. While the trial judge may consider the various factors listed in the authorities, those factors would not be treated as a checklist and no single factor or category of factors would be treated as being decisive.

E. Is There a Reasonable Claim of a Marriage-Like Relationship?
[51] In this case, many of the Molodowich factors are missing:

a) The parties never lived under the same roof. They never slept together. They were never in the same place at the same time during the relationship. The last time they saw each other in person was in November 2017, before the relationship began.

b) The parties never had consensual sex. They did not hug, kiss or hold hands. With the exception of the alleged sexual assault, they never touched one another physically.

c) The parties expressed care and affection for one another, but they rarely shared personal information or interest in their lives outside of their direct topic of communication. They did not write about their families, their friends, their religious beliefs or their work.

d) They expressed concern and support for one another when the other felt unwell or experienced health issues, but they did not provide any care or assistance during illness or other problems.

e) They did not assist one another with domestic chores.

f) They did not share their relationship with their peers or their community. There is no allegation, for example, that Mr. Dorje told his fellow monks or any of his followers about the relationship. There is no allegation that Ms. Han told her friends or any co-workers. Indeed, there is no allegation that anyone, with the exception of Ms. Han’s mother, knew about the relationship. Although Mr. Dorje gave Ms. Han’s mother a gift, he never met the mother and he never spoke to her.

g) They did not intend to have a child together. The child was conceived as a result of a sexual assault. While Mr. Dorje expressed interest in “meeting” the child, he never followed up. He currently has no relationship with the child. There is no allegation he has sought access or parenting arrangements.

[52] The only Molodowich factor of any real relevance in this case is economic support. Mr. Dorje provided the funds with which Ms. Han purchased a condominium. Mr. Dorje initially wrote that he wanted to buy a property with the money, but, he wrote, “It’s the same thing if you buy [it]”.

[53] Mr. Dorje also provided a significant amount of money for Ms. Han’s postpartum care and the child’s first year of life.

[54] This financial support may have been primarily for the benefit of the child. Even the condominium, Ms. Han wrote, was primarily for the benefit of the child.

[55] However, in my view, a trial judge may attach a broader significance to the financial support from Mr. Dorje than child support alone. A trial judge may find that the money Mr. Dorje provided to Ms. Han at her request was an expression of his commitment to her in circumstances in which he could not commit physically. The money and the gifts may be seen by the trial judge to have been a form of down payment by Mr. Dorje on a promise of continued emotional and financial support for Ms. Han, or, in Mr. Dorje’s own words, “Taking care of her and you are my duty for life” (emphasis added).

[56] On the other hand, I find it difficult to attach any particular significance to the fact that Mr. Dorje agreed to provide funds for Ms. Han to purchase a wedding ring. It appears to me that Ms. Han demanded that Mr. Dorje buy her a wedding ring, not that the ring had any mutual meaning to the parties as a marriage symbol. But it is relevant, in my view, that Mr. Dorje provided $20,000 USD to Ms. Han for something she wanted that was of no benefit to the child.

[57] Further, Ms. Han alleges that the parties intended to live together. At a minimum, a trial judge may find that the discussions about where Ms. Han and the child would live reflected a mutual intention of the parties to see one another and spend time together when they could.

[58] Mr. Dorje argues that an intention to live together at some point in the future is not sufficient to show that an existing relationship was marriage-like. He argues that the question of whether the relationship was marriage-like requires more than just intentions, citing Weber, supra.

[59] In my view, the documentary evidence referred to above provides some objective evidence in this case that the parties progressed beyond mere intentions. As stated, the parties appear to have expressed genuine care and affection for one another. They appear to have discussed marriage, trust, honesty, finances, mutual obligations and acquiring family property. These are not matters one would expect Mr. Dorje to discuss with a friend or a follower, or even with the mother of his child, without a marriage-like element of the relationship.

[60] A trial judge may find on the facts alleged by Ms. Han that the parties loved one another and would have lived together, but were unable to do so because of Mr. Dorje’s religious duties and nomadic lifestyle.

[61] The question I raised in the introduction to these reasons is whether a relationship that began on-line and never moved into the physical world can be marriage-like.

[62] Notably, the definition of a spouse in the Family Law Act does not require that the parties live together, only that they live with another person in a marriage-like relationship.

[63] In Connor Estate, 2017 BCSC 978, Mr. Justice Kent found that a couple that maintained two entirely separate households and never lived under the same roof formed a marriage-like relationship. (Connor Estate was decided under the intestacy provisions of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act, S.B.C. 2009, c. 13 ("WESA"), but courts have relied on cases decided under WESA and the FLA interchangeably for their definitions of a spouse.) Mr. Justice Kent found:

[50] The evidence is overwhelming and I find as a fact that Mr. Chambers and Ms. Connor loved and cared deeply about each other, and that they had a loving and intimate relationship for over 20 years that was far more than mere friendship or even so-called "friendship with benefits". I accept Mr. Chambers' evidence that he would have liked to share a home with Ms. Connor after the separation from his wife, but was unable to do so because of Ms. Connor's hoarding illness. The evidence amply supports, and I find as a fact, that Mr. Chambers and Ms. Connor loved each other, were faithful to each other, communicated with each other almost every day when they were not together, considered themselves to be (and presented themselves to be) "husband and wife" and were accepted by all who knew them as a couple.

[64] Connor Estate may be distinguishable from this case because Mr. Chambers and Ms. Connor were physically intimate for over 20 years, and presented themselves to the world as a married couple.

[65] Other decisions in which a marriage-like relationship has been found to exist despite the parties not living together have involved circumstances in which the couple lived under the same roof at previous points in the relationship, and the issue was whether they continued to be spouses after they took up separate residences: in Thompson v. Floyd, 2001 BCCA 78, the parties had lived together for a period of at least 11 years; in Roach v. Dutra, 2010 BCCA 264, the parties had lived together for approximately three years.

[66] However, as Mr. Justice Kent noted in Connor Estate:

[48] … [W]hile much guidance might be found in this case law, the simple fact is that no two cases are identical (and indeed they usually vary widely) and it is the assessment of evidence as a whole in this particular case which matters.

[67] Mr. Justice Kent concluded:

[53] Like human beings themselves, marriage-like relationships can come in many and various shapes. In this particular case, I have no doubt that such a relationship existed …

[68] As stated, Ms. Han’s claim is novel. It may even be weak. Almost all of the traditional factors are missing. The fact that Ms. Han and Mr. Dorje never lived under the same roof, never shared a bed and never even spent time together in person will militate against a finding they lived with one another in a marriage-like relationship. However, the traditional factors are not a mandatory check-list that confines the “elastic” concept of a marriage-like relationship. And if the COVID pandemic has taught us nothing else, it is that real relationships can form, blossom and end in virtual worlds.

[69] In my view, the merits of Ms. Han’s claim should be decided on the evidence. Subject to an overriding prejudice to Mr. Dorje, she should have leave to amend the notice of family claim. However, she should also provide meaningful particulars of the alleged marriage-like relationship.

F. Delay / Prejudice
[70] Ms. Han filed her notice of family claim on July 17, 2019. She brought this application to amend approximately one year and nine months after she filed the pleading, just over two months before the original trial date.

[71] Ms. Han’s delay was made all that more remarkable by her change in position from January 19, 2021, when she confirmed, through counsel, that she was not seeking spousal support in this case.

[72] Ms. Han gave notice of her intention to proceed with this application to Mr. Dorje on March 16, 2021. By the time the application was heard, the parties had conducted examinations for discovery without covering the issues that would arise from a claim of spousal support.

[73] Also, in April, Ms. Han produced additional documents, primarily text messages, that may be relevant to her claim of spousal support, but were undecipherable to counsel for Mr. Dorje, who does not read Mandarin.

[74] This application proceeded largely on documents selected and translated by counsel for Ms. Han. I was informed that Mandarin translations of the full materials would take 150 days.

[75] Understandably in the circumstances, Mr. Dorje argued that an amendment two months before trial would be neither just nor convenient. He argued that he would be prejudiced by an adjournment so as to allow Ms. Han to advance a late claim of spousal support.

[76] The circumstances changed on May 6, 2021, when Madam Justice Walkem adjourned the trial to July 2022 and reset it for 25 days. Madam Justice Walkem noted that most of the witnesses live internationally and require translators. She also noted that paternity may be in issue, and Mr. Dorje may amend his pleadings to raise that issue. It seems clear that, altogether apart from the potential spousal support claim, the parties were not ready to proceed to trial on June 7, 2021.

[77] In my view, any remaining prejudice to Mr. Dorje is outweighed by the importance of having all of the issues between the parties decided on their merits.

[78] Ms. Han’s delay and changes of position on spousal support may be a matter to de addressed in a future order of costs; but they are not grounds on which to deny her leave to amend the notice of family claim.

CONCLUSION
[79] Ms. Han is granted leave to amend her notice of family claim in the form attached as Appendix A to the notice of application to include a claim for spousal support.

[80] Within 21 days, or such other deadline as the parties may agree, Ms. Han must provide particulars of the marriage-like relationship alleged in the amended notice of family claim.

[81] Ms. Han is entitled to costs of this application in the cause of the spousal support claim.

“Master Elwood”

From the first two games Wiseman showed a lot of promise but the team has a long way to go. However this footage here is why you can never count the Warriors out. @stephencurry30 not missing a single shot for over 5 minutes. This is probably one of the most craziest basketball things I have seen in a while. #dubnation #goldenstatewarriors #nba

#'95年に日本ファルコムが開発、発売したアクションRPGであり、日本ファルコムのPCE向けゲーム最後の作品。
Dragon Slayerとうい名前が木屋氏が関わった作品のみに付けられるものとして認識される為に本作はDragon Slayerシリーズには含まれないという見方も持つ。

ダイモスとアリオスは首都イシュタルに帰還し、ヌースの命で新大陸調査に向かったリュコスが消息不明と聞き、リュコス捜索のため新大陸へと向かう。

主な特徴としては、ボス到達迄の横スクロール箇所を削除、
ボス面前に戦闘参加人数を1人か2人から選択可、攻撃技にキャラごとのコマンド入力を設定、レベル制の排除、HPの回復と復活が宿屋に変更等。

BGMは石川さんを始めFalcom Sound Team jdkスタッフが共同作・編曲。

※曲順はキングレコードのサントラ('95年）)を参考にしています

作曲：Falcom Sound Team jdk(石川三恵子さん、白川篤史氏、松岡博文氏、中島勝氏、金田直樹氏、新井智氏、綱島貴博氏)

Manufacturer: 1995.06.30 NEC-HE / Falcom
computer: PC Engine Super CD-ROM2
Hardware: HuC6280+CD-DA
Composer: Sound Team jdk, Mieko Ishikawa, Atsushi,hirakawa , Masaru Nakajima, Naoki Kaneda, Takahiro Tsunashima, Hirofumi Matsuoka , Satoshi Arai
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
00:00 01.Passage of Ocean
00:00 01.Passage of Ocean
00:44 02.Misfortunate Hunch
01:56 03.Peaceful Enclosure
04:44 04.Acquisition
04:51 05.Pleasant Estimation
06:59 06.Scattered Islands
10:14 07.Extremity Fear
11:55 08.Ship Wreck
14:26 09.Formation
14:32 10.First Attack
16:27 11.Triumphal Song
16:36 12.Big Storm (on deck)
18:02 13.Big Storm (inside)
19:29 14.SEA BREEZE TOWN
24:34 15.Moderation Tears
26:25 16.いつの日かこの愛を
27:30 17.Fertile Plain
28:39 18.OVER THE DESERT
32:51 19.Ancient Relics
34:53 20.BRAVE OF BLAZE
38:27 21.Forest of Shudder
42:41 22.Apparition Trees
47:18 23.Weird Air
49:17 24.Idleness Sleep
49:25 25.旅立つあなたへ
51:55 26.Underground Water Course
57:12 27.Immovable Fossil
59:22 28.In Her Mind
01:00:49 29.Magnificent Street
01:03:15 30.Elegance Residence
01:04:50 31.Powdery Snow
01:07:25 32.Heart Warm
01:09:35 33.Vast & Sever
01:12:31 34.Mist Land
01:15:58 35.Break Through
01:17:32 36.Retreat
01:17:37 37.Bad Past
01:20:38 38.The Missing Is...
01:23:26 39.Calm Reception
01:26:09 40.Crystal Valley
01:29:29 41.Heavenly Praise
01:30:50 42.One's Last Moment
01:34:27 43.Blind Man
01:36:17 44.Cave of Ocean Floor
01:39:47 45.Tragedy Knight
01:42:30 46.Hard Pressure
01:44:39 47.Evil's Supremacy
01:47:37 48.Into the Dark
01:50:20 49.Throne of Close
01:53:36 50.Slash for Chap
01:56:14 51.Down to the Abyss
01:57:55 52.Happy-Go-Lucky
02:00:50 53.SUPREMACY TITLE
02:03:08 54.Invitation for the New World (cd-da)
02:04:28 55.FROM FARAWAY (cd-da)
02:05:50 56.RECOLLECTION OF PAST (cd-da)
02:07:02 57.THE TRIUMPHAL HYMN (cd-da)
02:15:21 58.THREE YEARS LATER (cd-da)
02:19:50 59.THE REALMS OF GODDESS (cd-da)
02:21:24 60.SOPHIA (cd-da)
02:22:36 61.Final Awakening (cd-da)
02:24:12 62.The Last of Dragon Slayer (cd-da)
02:27:19 63.AMBITION TERRITORY (cd-da)
02:29:06 64.LONGING DESIRE (cd-da)
02:30:46 65.STERNLY SPIRIT (cd-da)
02:34:55 66.DESTRUCTION BELL (cd-da)
02:35:57 67.Darkness Thunderclap (cd-da)
02:37:13 68.FINAL AWAKENING (cd-da)
02:38:49 69.OTHER SIDE OF SORROWS (cd-da)
02:41:25 70.DAYLIGHT PROMISE (cd-da)
02:43:06 71.SOME DAY, SOME WHERE (cd-da)
02:45:27 72.On Blue Brilliant Place (cd-da)
02:49:39 73.FOLLOWING WIND (cd-da)
02:53:03 74.SUPREMACY TITLE (cd-da)
02:55:19 75.HARD PRESSURE ～ FIRST ATTACK (cd-da)
02:59:22 76.Sea Breeze Town
03:03:05 77.BLIND MAN ～ OVER THE DESERT (cd-da)
03:07:34 78.Brave of Blaze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ 10年感情的道别 | Goodbye My 10 Years Relationship ]
10年真的不短，很遗憾无法一起走到最后。

求婚了，却早已错过应该发生的时间点。
面对瓶颈考验的爱情在挽救期中感性被理性打败了，写下句号。
我们分了。我们都很不舍，但确实分了。

很抱歉，令所有期待的家人朋友失望了。
这10年里她对我很好，无可挑剔；而我做不好的我全都承认，是我的理所当然及舒适心态导致了今天的所有，我诚心道歉。

对于一直关心我俩的亲朋好友，感恩过去所有的祝福，也谢谢这些年的见证。
对于曾煽动我们分手的朋友们，抱歉拖了那么久，往后不需煽动了。

我特别要感谢彼此的家人、爱我们的家人们。这些年让大家心中累计的担忧及不满实在不应该，让大家操心了，诚恳地鞠躬致歉。谢谢这些年的爱与包容，打从心里的感恩，谢谢。

在这里，至这位10年前为我化妆而邂逅的，10年来风雨不改以我为先的，让我在爱情里一夜长大的她 – Mey ，谢谢你一切付出、包容、体谅及信任，完整了我生活许多的缺失区块，也为我生命彩出了鲜艳的色彩。谢谢你总无条件地支持我每个决定，即使以世界为敌你还是站在我身旁。谢谢你无限的精神鼓励，让我即使在烂透的状态下也努力撑过去，因为我知道至少还有你这位铁粉的守候。万语千言在心中说不尽，我想你知道的。谢谢你，真心真心地谢谢你。正如我十年前为你写的歌 – “美丽意外“里的歌词，至今，我仍觉得遇见你是个美丽的意外，真的。

容我忍泪再次公开说，Mey, 我爱你。

面对10年感情的结束，难过是肯定的。
即使平时爱笑的我们，也为这次的句号流了好多公升的泪。但我们答应彼此会带着所有开心的记忆把对方放在心中一个特别的位置。换了身份，没了昵称，不管未来缘分如何，我们都会是彼此继续珍惜的那位。

最后，公开这首十年前写给她的歌，也是十年后我重新录制十周年版本向她求婚的作品。MV里记录了过去十年的精选画面，婚没求得成，但我们都认为这首歌是纪念这10年的最初；10年的最终，最佳的礼物，也要谢谢歌曲的幕后团队 ：佳旺 (金马旺) 的 编曲 / 制作 / 录音 /配唱 ，沁嘉 的 合音编写 / 合音 ， 文浩 的混音。他们是少数知道我求婚计划也期待着好消息的朋友。。。可惜让你们失望了，谢谢你们的一切付出与耐心，我都真心感激。

爱情其实只有你和我，但考虑到彼此有太多共同朋友，为了避免揣测还是决定做个交代。谢谢大家这十年的祝福。当你看到这贴文时我俩的脸书感情状态应该已经更新。

是很意外，连我俩都为这样的今天感到意外，如果是注定意外，至少让它是个 [美丽意外]，好吗？

爱要及时，记得好好珍惜依然在你身边的那位，衷心祝福大家。
缘起缘灭感恩一切，合十。

10 years, regret that we couldn’t make it till the end.

I proposed, but had missed the right timing to do it right.
After went through the consideration period, rational beat sentimental, it ended.
Yes, we broke up. It’s really hard to accept, but yes, we broke up.

Truly regret to all friends and families’ members who had expectation on us.For the past 10 years, she’s perfect. For all the wrong which I made, I’ll take all the blame. I’m truly sorry, for the relationship which I care so much.

To all friends who care about both of us throughout these 10 years, thanks for witnessing us.
To those who didn’t expect good ending, sorry for the long waiting.

I would like to specially thank both of our family’s members. I can understand all the worries and dissatisfactions throughout the years. Really shouldn’t allow those to happen. I Sincerely apologize. Sorry.

Hereby, I would like to thank her, the girl I crushed into when she did make up for me 10 years ago, the girl who always put me as priority for the past 10 years, the girl who used 10 years’ time to grew me up in the world of love – Mey , Thank you for everything, you completed a lot of my missing part in life and had brighten up my days with different colours. Thanks for always standing by my side although when the world disagree on me. Thanks for your bottomless mental support which let me went through lots of down time as I always know there’ll at least be a super fans forever, it’s you. As of now, I still feel like knowing you is 1 of the most beautiful accident in life, and you able to calmed me down whenever and wherever you were around. It’s more than words, I’m sure you knew it, thank you so much, sincerely.

Allow me to hold my tears and say this 1 more time openly, Mey, I love you, as always.

10 years long run coming to an end, for sure it’s really hurt and sad.
But we’ll promise to bring along all happy memories and place each other at a special point in our heart. You will always be a person that I care about.

Lastly, sharing out the song I wrote for her 10 years ago, and it’s being re-produced again into a 10th year anniversary version for my proposal purpose. The MV are made by all key moments we been through together. Although my proposal failed, but we do think it’s a best way to conclude and remember those 10 years, from the beginning to the end. Thanks to the song production team : Keon Chia (Golden Horse Award Winner 2020) for Music Arrangement, Produce, Recording, Vocal Guide. Thanks to Isabell Jia Jia for the background Vocal & Background Vocal Arrangement. Thanks to Haw Vee for the Mixing. They were the few who knew my proposal plan and awaiting the good news …. However, sorry to let you all down. Thanks to all the effort, it’s my honor to have you guys in this important journey and I deeply appreciate it in heart.

Love actually is just you & me, but we decided to explain about this to avoid any assumptions as we got too many mutual friends. Thanks to all lovely wishes for the past 10 years. When you see this post, I believe our relationship status on FB had changed.

Yes it’s really an accident to our relationship, even to ourselves. If it’s meant to be an accident, at least let it be a “Beautiful Accident”.

Always express your LOVE before too late and appreciate he/her who still together with you. Best wishes to everyone.

With Love, Sorry and Thanks.

#美丽意外 #BeautifulAccident #ThanksForEverything #LOVE

Music Production Team
美丽意外 (2020十周年版）
OP :Musictoxin Productions
SP: Universal Music Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
词Lyrics : Dickson蔡迪伸
曲Composer : Dickson蔡迪伸
编Arranged by : Keon Chia谢佳旺 @Burger Music Studio
制作Produced by : Keon Chia谢佳旺 / Dickson蔡迪伸
混音 Mixed by : Haw Vee魏文浩 @musicHaws Production
和音编写Back up vocal arranged by : Isabell潘沁珈
和音Back up vocal by : Isabell潘沁珈
录音室Recording Studio : Tutti Studio

⬇︎今回は

フジテレビ系月9ドラマ「シャーロック」主題歌「ディーン・フジオカ - Shelly」【フル/字幕/歌詞付/作業用LOOP】カバーをupしました‼️

▶︎歌い手「HARAKEN」さん✨

ご視聴お願いします‼️

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎🆕新チャンネルスタートしました‼️
✨チャンネル登録お願いします‼️

Alph4 Recordings
https://youtube.com/Alph4Recordings

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎ドラマ関連動画

【公式】月9『シャーロック』10月7日よる9時スタート！ティザー映像公開（30秒Ver.）
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxJqs4EqEd4

【公式】月9『シャーロック』10月7日よる9時スタート！特別ロングスポット
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdsiFKWVNLc

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎チャンネル登録はこちら♪
http://bit.ly/MikiFujisue

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎クレジット (Cover)

・ボーカル　：HARAKEN
・音楽制作　：藤末樹
・映像制作　：藤末樹
・企画構成　：藤末樹

・Associate Art Director：Mark Kobayashi (GAIKEI)
・Executive Producer：Miki Fujisue

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎藤末樹 - Miki Fujisue（SNS）

Twitter : https://twitter.com/MikiFujisue_Tw
Instagram : https://instagram.com/miki.fujisue
Facebook Page : https://facebook.com/Miki.jpn
YouTube：https://www.youtube.com/MikiFujisue

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎HARAKEN（SNS）
Twitter : https://twitter.com/HARAKEN75766631

⬇︎HARAKEN（カバー動画集）
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZRggFcpoLzKIYvbOTEEQZZKMleoxayov

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎歌詞

Shelly - ディーン・フジオカ
（フジテレビ系月9ドラマ「シャーロック」主題歌）
作詞：DEAN FUJIOKA / 作曲：DEAN FUJIOKA・UTA

You tell me
Shelly　求めていたもの
Shelly　探していたもの
Shelly　夢を生きていたの
Shelly　ぬくもりだけ残して

Hey, I just wanna kiss you now
突然過ぎるメロディ　ずぶ濡れで動けない
ねえ　置き去り甘い吐息
締め付けられる鼓動　今も

Every time you hit play, I’m your Clyde
You and me together against the world

You tell me
Shelly　涙で見えない
Shelly　消えてく背中に
Shelly　届かない指先
Shelly, oh Shelly, my love

Shelly　求めていたもの
Shelly　探していたもの
Shelly　夢を生きていたの
Shelly　ぬくもりだけ残して

Hey, did I ever cross your mind
Forever was the promise we made
Only if you remember the love we knew
Hey, wish you’re here to hold me tight
All the memories with me stay

我們的故事　能不能逆水倒流
毎一分毎一秒　都伶イ丁却又温柔
我們的故事　能不能逆水倒流
毎一分毎一秒　都伶イ丁却又温柔
That’s what she said

Every time you hit play, I’m your Clyde
You and me together against the world

You tell me
Shelly　涙で見えない
Shelly　消えてく背中に
Shelly　届かない指先
Shelly, oh Shelly, my love

Shelly　求めていたもの
Shelly　探していたもの
Shelly　夢を生きていたの
Shelly　他には何も要らない

Shelly, remember how we used to be？
Shelly, said it was all meant to be
Shelly, let it be everlasting
Shelly, oh Shelly, my love

Shelly, cuz you are my everything
Shelly, everything that I’ve been missing
Shelly, there’s no-one like you baby
Shelly, come back to me, my destiny

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎ドラマクレジット

出演者　：ディーン・フジオカ/岩田剛典
　　　　　山田真歩/ゆうたろう/佐々木蔵之介
原作　　：アーサー・コナン・ドイル
　　　　『シャーロック・ホームズ』シリーズ
脚本　　：井上由美子
音楽　　：菅野祐悟
主題歌　：DEAN FUJIOKA「Shelly」
OＰ曲　：DEAN FUJIOKA「Searching For The Ghost」

プロデュース：太田 大
演出　　　　：西谷 弘/野田悠介/永山耕三
制作著作　　：フジテレビ

-----------------------------------------------

⬇︎関連リンク

ディーン・フジオカ - 公式サイト
https://www.deanfujioka.net/top/

ディーン・フジオカ - Twitter
https://twitter.com/DEANFUJIOKA

ディーン・フジオカ - Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/tfjok/

ディーン・フジオカ - Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/deanofficial

ディーン・フジオカ - YouTubeチャンネル
https://www.youtube.com/user/deanfujiokanetjp

ディーン・フジオカ - 所属事務所「アミューズ」HP
https://artist.amuse.co.jp/artist/dean_fujioka/

ディーン・フジオカ - 所属事務所「アミューズ」Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/amuse.jp

ディーン・フジオカ - 「所属事務所アミューズ」Twitter
https://twitter.com/amuse_official

フジテレビ系月9ドラマ「シャーロック」- フジテレビ
https://www.fujitv.co.jp/sherlock/

フジテレビ系月9ドラマ「シャーロック」- Twitter
https://twitter.com/SHERLOCKcx

フジテレビ系月9ドラマ「シャーロック」- Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/sherlock_cx/

#ディーンフジオカ #Shelly #シャーロック