Summer is around the corner! Don’t regret not preparing for the beach ahead of time!
暑假快來嘍!不要後悔自己沒有提早準備海邊的身材喔!⚠️中文部分都在下面圖片上⚠️
🔹1 on 1 personal trainer opening spot currently open🔹一對一教練有空位上課了
⚠️Currently have morning spots available only from 7:00am to 08:30am on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday morning ⚠️禮拜二,四跟六現在都有空在早上07:00-08:30。有興趣密我一下我們看看時間能不能幫你調整一下
Only looking for serious people looking to change their physique. 我主要的是認真要訓練的人。這不是一個服務,這是一個教學。我不是為了你們舒服有人聊天過時間,我是為了你們目標為止需求的。
I won’t make everyone train like they’re getting ready for a contest, however, I will approach and personalize everyone’s personal goals specifically to their needs. Location is in Taipei city or New Taipei City不需要跟我一樣要準備比賽的態度一樣那麼硬。但你們需要了解這是需要中心,耐心,努力,認真的態度才能夠改變自己的體態。我會看著你們本人的需求做成你們課程內容
Clientele I will not be taking stated below: ⬇️
I handpick clients. Space is limited. If you’re mot serious about the commitment please do not message me! Thank you! 下面有寫我正在找的學生需求
🔹No unstable working time professionals who will swap time schedules
如果你時間不穩定的話,無法正常來上課,這個課程不適合你
🔹 No college kids, don’t need to hear about why you can’t come to class: midterms, money, part time job, studying, etc. 不要大學生,我不想一直聽到一些理由跟我說你們為什麼不能來上課,期中考,錢不夠,讀書準備考試。要負責任這些事情才可以處理生活其他部分。
🔹Don’t sign up if you’re afraid of being sore, tired or getting sweaty. This isn’t for me, it’s for you. Understand it’s tasking to change your body. 如果你怕酸痛,怕流汗,怕累,怕訓練到疲勞,這個課程不適合你。
🔹Don’t complain about which exercises, sets and or reps I tell you to do. If something is painful/discomfort, obviously I’ll change it, but I’m talking purely about arguing against the workouts because they’re hard. 不要抱怨跟我說那些運動動作太難,太累,不好做等等。本來改變不是簡單拿到的,一定會這樣。如果說你做到很不舒服因為關節痛,肌肉有問題或者遇到姿勢不對,一定要跟我說我才能幫你們改。
🔹No short term clientele: minimum 20 classes at a time ~ 2 or 3 classes per week at minimum. Anything less than that and you’re not getting benefit. 不要短期學生。至少要20堂課,一個禮拜必須要至少上2~3堂課才能有效果。少於2堂課你已經不用再來了。太少沒有用。
🔹If you’re unwilling to change diet, fix alcohol consumption or your sleep schedule to fit your goals, then this course isn’t for you. 如果不願意借酒,改變飲食習慣,睡眠,健康程度的話這也不適合你。你需要能夠想要把自己變好,有中心在健康想法範圍內才會有進步。要能夠接受這些改變才會變成更好。
🔹I don’t sell bullshit, I sell results. Tracking will be a thing. 我不是賣爛的教學。我賣的教學會有效果。記得我無法24/7跟你們本人在一起。時間陪我只有一次一個小時,其他時間必須要負責任,外面訓練完亂吃,亂喝,不認真做心肺鼓勵下去不能怪我說我什麼都不會教課因為你自己不認真不是我的問題。你們自己需要有負責任在課程之外時間控制自己。我會紀錄進步速度還有我們上課運動的內容計畫一下長期時間的訓練課程。
Leggo
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3萬的網紅Henry & Donny,也在其Youtube影片中提到,📮 Turn on Subtitles CC 📮|English , 中文 , French , Español , 日本語 , 한국어 , ไทย , Indonesia , Português Our Second hand Sale 二手拍賣: https://shopee.tw/donny...
arguing中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的精選貼文
今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
arguing中文 在 浩爾譯世界 Facebook 的精選貼文
故事的後續和一些思辯
謝謝大家喜歡紐時廣告案幕後的故事
https://reurl.cc/O1VgoX
這幾天想了很多,有些心得
要關心時政,但不要政治化
Be political, not politicized.
聽國際狗語日報 X 百靈果News 談到「紐時其實親中」這集 (我是普通虔誠的百靈果教徒),Kylie 跟 Ken 講的很好,提醒我別忘批判思考
紐約時報可說是偏左派媒體,提倡進步價值,逢「川」必反,會拿中國議題打川普。這次疫情的報導卻不太質疑中國政府的數字,這點的確讓人疑惑
但或許紐時親不親中不是重點,我聽到他們主要強調的重點是,努力很好,但可以更好,而且應該用目的決定手段,而不是一廂情願,一頭熱
小有參與 #TaiwanCanHelp 紐時廣告案的我
聽到 Kylie 有對核心團隊提出建議
我覺得很不錯!
畢竟這次最大的感慨是
#會批評的人很多但會批改的人很少
他們在節目中提出了幾項讓錢可以「更有效」達成國際傳播效益的方式,例如投到 The Daily Show 或者美國(甚至世界)最多人聽的 Podcast 節目
我覺得是不錯的討論和批改,謝謝你們!
(其實我最近開始每天在讀的華爾街日報也是不錯的廣告選擇,讀者很多共和黨高收入族群)
雖然我不是廣告案發起人,但我想,創發、創造、創業,這些創字輩的,都需要 #被討厭的勇氣 也需要更多批判思考(轉頭看我自己創的公司就叫做 創譯語言顧問......)
秉持的不該是躲避批評,或者是說「沒有參與的人,吵什麼吵」或者「不要理他們」、「他們羨慕嫉妒啦」之類的噤聲、自我安慰
而是一邊站穩腳步,肯定好的,一邊自我檢討不好的,讓每一個下一次都可以更好!
(內心當然很希望有個程式可以篩選出最有智慧的意見,找出交集,產生最佳作法行動方針就是了,但就是還沒有這種東西)
這成長的心態不就跟口譯學習的道理一樣嗎?
要面對自己的不足,不斷打碎再練,又不能忘記肯定自己,否則無法繼續下去
——
有興趣跟我學口譯的人就自己去找吧,這篇就不業配線上課程了。
——
曾經,我一心覺得,只要好好鑽研翻譯,提升自己的造詣,不就好了嗎?何必「碰」政治和經濟?
後來理解:不管在什麼領域,都可以只活在自己的世界,但你其實不怎麼關心大環境。那是獨善其身和兼善天下理念的差異。
於是我轉變想法:關心政治不叫「碰政治」,因為政治的事就是人的事
而英文,是我們跟這個世界互動的好工具,所以不要躲避政治英文和經濟英文(學口譯一定要學啊,還有政治中文和經濟中文,永難忘記 20 幾歲才第一次讀經濟日報,覺得這不是中文)
但,人不要政治化。
——
評論家 Sonny Bunch 這兩段話很有智慧,一起來讀 political 和 politicized 的差異
Political:不必為了擁護捍衛自己的政治立場而感到羞愧
There’s nothing wrong with living a political life. That is, a life in which politics is one of your interests or your job, something you follow and keep track of and educate yourself on and argue about. The arena of politics is important; political decisions have consequences; and passionately arguing for your preferred political outcomes is nothing to be ashamed of.
the arena of politics 政治的競技場
Politicized:政治立場不合者,勢不兩立
A politicized life is a different beast, however. It treats politics as a zero sum game or a form of total warfare in which the other side must be obliterated. It alters every aspect of your being: where you shop; what you watch on TV; what sort of music you listen to; who you associate with. If you’re not with the politicized being, you’re against him—and if you’re against him, he is well within his rights to ruin you personally and economically. You, the political other, are a leper to be shunned, lest your thoughtcrimes infect the rest of society.
zero sum game 非輸即贏的零和遊戲
total warfare 全面戰事
obliterate 消滅
leper 痲瘋病患
thoughtcrime 思想犯罪
是不是很值得反思?
所以我說
要關心時政,但不要政治化
Be political, not politicized.
——
這也是自由最可貴的地方。
——
也許你常接觸紐約時報、時代雜誌、經濟學人
但不常接觸華爾街日報 The Wall Street Journal
如果想換個角度思考、看世界,學英文
不妨加入我的每日讀報學英文計畫
留言 Be political, not politicized.
就私訊你限時限量優惠
#沒有作息可言的
浩爾
arguing中文 在 Henry & Donny Youtube 的最佳解答
📮 Turn on Subtitles CC 📮|English , 中文 , French , Español , 日本語 , 한국어 , ไทย , Indonesia , Português
Our Second hand Sale 二手拍賣:
https://shopee.tw/donny.lin?v=d41&smtt=0.0.4
Henry Tv drama https://www.iq.com/album/25z5h98khah?from=iqiyi_tw
Henry IG https://www.instagram.com/henryamouriq/
Donny IG https://www.instagram.com/donny.lin/
My FB https://www.facebook.com/HenryAmouric/
Hello everyone,
We hoped you guys liked the video if you could help us by sharing it and give us alike!👍🏻
You also could comment below, we will reply as much as we can ❤️
Love you all 💙
Donny & Henry❣️
大家好,Donny&Henry❣️
我們希望你們喜歡這個影片👍🏻
你們可以在下面留言,我們將盡可能的回覆你們❤️
愛你們所有人💙
亨利·IG https://www.instagram.com/henryamouriq/
Donny IG https://www.instagram.com/donny.lin/
我的FB https://www.facebook.com/HenryAmouric/
相機 : Canon EOS M5
arguing中文 在 加油不能說fighting?//How to encourage people in English 的必吃
|全英文訪談| 中文 講解|HOPE English希平方. HOPE English 希平方 New 518 views · 16:48. Go to channel · Top 140 Chinese Characters Make Up 50% of ... ... <看更多>