關於 the tigray people's liberation front ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

YT傳送門： https://youtu.be/tHANDYGlqDQ

Twitch傳送門： https://www.twitch.tv/otakuarmy2

#遠程火箭炮 ，躲過 #中程導彈條約 ，但讓比較窮的國家有了好棒棒的武器可以用，而且還不能攔截！

其實要講遠程火箭炮，故事要從中導條約說起。《美利堅合眾國與蘇維埃社會主義共和國聯盟關於銷毀中程和中短程飛彈之條約》（英語：Treaty between the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A. on the Elimination of Their Intermediaterange and Shorter-range Missiles)

維基百科是這樣寫的：【2017年，俄方認為包含一些大氣層內美國無人機其實與中程導彈無異，並稱30年來俄羅斯銷毀1,800枚以上、美國只銷毀800枚；俄羅斯總統普丁質疑美國自海灣戰爭起，大量將戰斧巡弋飛彈BGM-109改裝為對地用途並用於實戰，以陽奉陰違的方式違反條約，態度轉趨強硬。美方對俄方近年的執行上也有相似質疑，促使眾議員要求美國總統川普退出條約。自1988年雷根政府簽訂中導條約至2018年，美國雖擁有並實際使用海基戰斧巡航導彈用於對地攻擊，不過因中導條約，仍有所限制尤其是不能出口，此間對中華人民共和國向沙烏地出口東風-3包括後來的升級替換版本東風-21持默認態度。】簡單來說，美俄當年簽訂這個條約是為了彼此約束核武器中的投射工具，但也間接導致中國成了冷戰末期全球唯一能出口該類型飛彈的國家，但雖然可以出口，美俄也都不能賣，可是問題是真正的中程彈道飛彈價格很高，許多窮國買不起，做上了軍火生意的中方自然把改良的腦筋動到射程已經跟中短程飛彈相差不遠的遠程火箭炮身上，再加上了導引系統，簡直便宜又好用。

根據ＥＴＴＯＤＡＹ的報導：【衣索比亞近日爆發內戰，掌控北部提格雷州的提格雷人民解放陣線（提人陣線，Tigray People's Liberation Front, TPLF）與政府軍爆發激烈交火，政府軍使用中國製的「AR-2遠程火箭炮」成功壓制提人陣線，成功控制阿克蘇姆（Aksum）阿杜瓦（Adowa）兩個重鎮，而這也是中製AR-2遠程火箭炮首次實戰紀錄。
根據陸媒報導，衣索比亞政府軍使用的是AR-2遠程火箭炮，也就是解放軍PHL-03自行火箭炮的出口版，是一種300毫米口徑重型遠程火箭炮，採用固體燃料發動機推進，據稱最大射程達150公里，採用帶有反裝甲/步兵的集束彈頭，衣索比亞政府軍的使用AR-2遠程火箭炮對100公里以外的目標進行壓制性打擊，採用智慧型集束火箭彈可以一次覆蓋60公頃內目標。】

簡單來說，台灣海峽並不是很寬廣的一個阻隔，如果真要實戰運用，遠程火箭炮的相對便宜和不可攔截性，幾乎就等於把八二三炮戰一路拉到台灣本島來，所以許多武統愛好者很愛提這件事，尤其是最近又有了一大堆相關的產品，有的還號徵導引精確度勝過最精密的狙擊槍，到底真的假的，那今天就請 #施孝瑋 來談談PHL-03自行火箭炮、SY-400超遠程火箭炮、衛士火箭（到底為什麼只供出口啊）、台灣也有的雷霆兩千，還有台灣已經買了還沒有收到貨的M142高機動性多管火箭系統（英語：M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System）。一次通通講好講滿，聽個過癮～～～～

阿宅萬事通語錄貼圖上架囉 https://reurl.cc/dV7bmD​

【加入YT會員按鈕】 https://reurl.cc/raleRb​
【訂閱YT頻道按鈕】 https://reurl.cc/Q3k0g9​
購買朱大衣服傳送門： https://shop.lucifer.tw/

【#譚德塞不能說的秘密】《華爾街日報》4月5日社論，講述台灣早在2019年12月31日已經通知世衛，台灣有證據相信武漢肺炎病毒是人傳人，但世衛高層卻選擇只發佈中國提供的消息(「沒有證據是人傳人」），最後證明是fake news。

YouTube: 譚德塞被台灣死亡恐嚇？
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxHbQmvD0L8

World Health Coronavirus Disinformation
By The Editorial Board, Wall Street Journal
April 5, 2020 5:28 pm ET

//The coronavirus pandemic will offer many lessons in what to do better to save more lives and do less economic harm the next time. But there's already one way to ensure future pandemics are less deadly: Reform or defund the World Health Organization (WHO).

Last week Florida Senator Rick Scott called for a Congressional investigation into the United Nations agency's "role in helping Communist China cover up information regarding the threat of the Coronavirus." The rot at WHO goes beyond canoodling with Beijing, but that's a good place to start.

The coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China, sometime in the autumn, perhaps as early as November. It accelerated in December. Caixin Global reported that Chinese labs had sequenced the coronavirus genome by the end of December but were ordered by Chinese officials to destroy samples and not publish their findings. On Dec. 30 Dr. Li Wenliang warned Chinese doctors about the virus, and several days later local authorities accused him of lies that "severely disturbed the social order."

Taiwanese officials warned WHO on Dec. 31 that they had seen evidence that the virus could be transmitted human-to-human. But the agency, bowing to Beijing, doesn't have a normal relationship with Taiwan. On Jan. 14 WHO tweeted, "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission." The agency took another week to reverse that misinformation.

On Jan. 22-23 a WHO emergency committee debated whether to declare Covid-19 a "public health emergency of international concern." The virus already had spread to several countries, and making such a declaration would have better prepared the world. It should have been an easy decision, despite Beijing's objections. Yet director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus declined and instead traveled to China.
He finally made the declaration on Jan. 30—losing a week of precious time—and his rhetoric suggests the trip to Beijing was more about politics than public health. "The Chinese government is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken," he said. "I left in absolutely no doubt about China's commitment to transparency."

A University of Southampton study suggests the number of coronavirus cases could have been reduced by 95% had China moved to contain the virus three weeks sooner. Yet Dr. Tedros gushed that Beijing had set "a new standard for outbreak response." He also praised the speed with which China "sequenced the genome and shared it with WHO and the world." China didn't do so until Jan. 12.

On Jan. 30 Dr. Tedros also said that "WHO doesn't recommend limiting trade and movement." President Trump ignored the advice and announced travel restrictions on China the following day, slowing the spread of the virus. U.S. progressive elites echoed WHO and criticized Mr. Trump. WHO didn't declare the coronavirus a pandemic until March 11.

Not that any of this has prompted much soul-searching. Alluding to China, WHO official Michael Ryan said last week, "We need to be very careful also to not to be profiling certain parts of the world as being uncooperative." Beijing touted the remarks, as it has other WHO statements.
***

This record is tragic but not surprising. Much of the blame for WHO's failures lies with Dr. Tedros, who is a politician, not a medical doctor. As a member of the left-wing Tigray People's Liberation Front, he rose through Ethiopia's autocratic government as health and foreign minister. After taking the director-general job in 2017, he tried to install Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe as a WHO goodwill ambassador.
China inevitably gains more international clout as its economy grows. But why does WHO seem so much more afraid of Beijing's ire than Washington's? Only 12% of WHO's assessed member-state contributions come from China. The U.S. contributes 22%. Americans at WHO generally are loyal to the institution, while Chinese appointees put Chinese interests first or they will suffer Beijing's wrath.
China's influence over WHO has been organized and consistent, whereas the U.S. response has been haphazard. Washington needs a quarterback to lead the fight against Chinese dominance at WHO and other international organizations. Yet the State Department's Bureau of International Organization Affairs lacks a political appointee.
The U.S. will have allies in an effort to reform WHO. A frustrated Japanese deputy prime minister called WHO the "Chinese Health Organization." British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly is rethinking U.K.-China ties over China's lack of candor about the virus.

***
Congress should investigate how WHO performed against the coronavirus and whether its judgments were corrupted by China's political influence. Of all international institutions, WHO should be the least political. Its core mission is to coordinate international efforts against epidemics and provide honest public-health guidance.

If WHO is merely a politicized Maginot Line against pandemics, then it is worse than useless and should receive no more U.S. funding. And if foreign-policy elites want to know why so many Americans mistrust international institutions, WHO is it.//

Twitch傳送門： https://www.twitch.tv/otakuarmy2

#遠程火箭炮 ，躲過 #中程導彈條約 ，但讓比較窮的國家有了好棒棒的武器可以用，而且還不能攔截！

其實要講遠程火箭炮，故事要從中導條約說起。《美利堅合眾國與蘇維埃社會主義共和國聯盟關於銷毀中程和中短程飛彈之條約》（英語：Treaty between the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A. on the Elimination of Their Intermediaterange and Shorter-range Missiles)

維基百科是這樣寫的：【2017年，俄方認為包含一些大氣層內美國無人機其實與中程導彈無異，並稱30年來俄羅斯銷毀1,800枚以上、美國只銷毀800枚；俄羅斯總統普丁質疑美國自海灣戰爭起，大量將戰斧巡弋飛彈BGM-109改裝為對地用途並用於實戰，以陽奉陰違的方式違反條約，態度轉趨強硬。美方對俄方近年的執行上也有相似質疑，促使眾議員要求美國總統川普退出條約。自1988年雷根政府簽訂中導條約至2018年，美國雖擁有並實際使用海基戰斧巡航導彈用於對地攻擊，不過因中導條約，仍有所限制尤其是不能出口，此間對中華人民共和國向沙烏地出口東風-3包括後來的升級替換版本東風-21持默認態度。】簡單來說，美俄當年簽訂這個條約是為了彼此約束核武器中的投射工具，但也間接導致中國成了冷戰末期全球唯一能出口該類型飛彈的國家，但雖然可以出口，美俄也都不能賣，可是問題是真正的中程彈道飛彈價格很高，許多窮國買不起，做上了軍火生意的中方自然把改良的腦筋動到射程已經跟中短程飛彈相差不遠的遠程火箭炮身上，再加上了導引系統，簡直便宜又好用。

根據ＥＴＴＯＤＡＹ的報導：【衣索比亞近日爆發內戰，掌控北部提格雷州的提格雷人民解放陣線（提人陣線，Tigray People's Liberation Front, TPLF）與政府軍爆發激烈交火，政府軍使用中國製的「AR-2遠程火箭炮」成功壓制提人陣線，成功控制阿克蘇姆（Aksum）阿杜瓦（Adowa）兩個重鎮，而這也是中製AR-2遠程火箭炮首次實戰紀錄。
根據陸媒報導，衣索比亞政府軍使用的是AR-2遠程火箭炮，也就是解放軍PHL-03自行火箭炮的出口版，是一種300毫米口徑重型遠程火箭炮，採用固體燃料發動機推進，據稱最大射程達150公里，採用帶有反裝甲/步兵的集束彈頭，衣索比亞政府軍的使用AR-2遠程火箭炮對100公里以外的目標進行壓制性打擊，採用智慧型集束火箭彈可以一次覆蓋60公頃內目標。】

簡單來說，台灣海峽並不是很寬廣的一個阻隔，如果真要實戰運用，遠程火箭炮的相對便宜和不可攔截性，幾乎就等於把八二三炮戰一路拉到台灣本島來，所以許多武統愛好者很愛提這件事，尤其是最近又有了一大堆相關的產品，有的還號徵導引精確度勝過最精密的狙擊槍，到底真的假的，那今天就請 #施孝瑋 來談談PHL-03自行火箭炮、SY-400超遠程火箭炮、衛士火箭（到底為什麼只供出口啊）、台灣也有的雷霆兩千，還有台灣已經買了還沒有收到貨的M142高機動性多管火箭系統（英語：M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System）。一次通通講好講滿，聽個過癮～～～～


阿宅萬事通語錄貼圖上架囉 https://reurl.cc/dV7bmD​

【加入YT會員按鈕】 https://reurl.cc/raleRb​
【訂閱YT頻道按鈕】 https://reurl.cc/Q3k0g9​
購買朱大衣服傳送門： https://shop.lucifer.tw/