Search
托福聽力單字，同學最不擅長／恨的藝術史類來囉❤️
這篇單字你一定要會，注意發音，耳朵聽的懂才是關鍵！
以下連結為托福聽力真題_藝術類
必背單字依據「高頻常考、易混淆字」的方向來分享
每次分享「25個」，關鍵複習、無負擔～
以後每週更新二次，有需要的同學記得有空來刷一回吧！
https://quizlet.com/_8l5hiv?x=1jqt&i=2zac5f
#跑完一回別忘了回覆「我會了／謝謝老師／這太簡單...」
#別忘了按讚留言+1+2+3唷
((字卡別忘了設定「自動發音」唷
New York Times 第三擊
【China’s Hong Kong Policy Is Perverse. It Always Has Been.】
By Lewis Lau Yiu-man
HONG KONG — Beijing says it wants to safeguard “one country, two systems,” the principle that supposedly guarantees Hong Kong’s semiautonomy from the mainland. In reality it is weaponizing the policy to crush the city’s freedoms.
On Thursday, the Chinese government announced a plan to pass national security laws for Hong Kong. It has long been after something like this, though previously it expected the local authorities to do the job. Not this time. This law would be ratified in Beijing — at worst, as soon as next week.
This sinister move caps several weeks of mounting acts of repression in Hong Kong, in almost all spheres of public life — politics, law, education, the media.
Last week, students sitting for a university-entrance history exam were asked if they agreed with this statement: “Japan did more good than harm to China in the period of 1900-45.” The Hong Kong Education Bureau promptly complained that the question was “leading” and asked that it be stricken from the exam, even though some students had already answered it.
The Education Bureau also claimed that the question “seriously hurt the feelings and dignity of the Chinese people who suffered great pain during the Japanese invasion of China.” For many traditional Chinese patriots there is simply no way the Japanese could have brought any benefit whatsoever to China; to merely ask that question is to somehow prettify the Second Sino-Japanese War of 1937-45.
Never mind that the exam referred to the years between 1900 and 1945, rather than solely to the war. And never mind that there is ample historical evidence showing that Japan’s vast influence on China during that period also served China well in some ways. Sun Yat-sen, the most famous early leader of post-imperial modern China; major actors in China’s socialist movement; even Lu Xun, arguably the greatest writer in modern Chinese literature, were all inspired or shaped to a certain extent by contact with Japan.
More than anything, questions such as this one have been a fixture of history exams in Hong Kong. I studied history at university, and I remember this exam question from 2006: “Some people think Emperor Wen of Sui (541-604) did more harm than good. Do you agree with that?”
Then this week pro-Beijing lawmakers hijacked the election for chairperson of a committee of Hong Kong’s legislative council, calling in security guards to control the scene, and placed at the committee’s head a pro-establishment legislator accused of abuse of power.
“Headliner,” a satirical show of the public broadcaster RTHK, was canceled after Hong Kong authorities complained that it denigrated the Hong Kong police.
And the government, even as it is relaxing various social-distancing rules to fend off Covid-19, just extended restrictions on group gatherings to June 4 — the anniversary of the 1989 massacre at Tiananmen Square. The commemorative protest vigil that has been held that day every year may not take place for the first time in three decades. (It occurred even during the SARS outbreak of 2002-03.)
Next week, Hong Kongers face another blatant effort by Beijing to instill in them patriotism for China and loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party: The local Legislature will consider a bill that would criminalize the misuse of China’s national anthem or insults toward it. And, of course, there is the national security legislation.
The Chinese Communist Party is ambitious, and it is impatient. It doesn’t just want to control Hong Kong; it wants to remodel the minds and souls of the Hong Kong people.
Chinese state media said of the history exam controversy that it was an occasion for Hong Kong to “surgically detoxify” its education system so as to make it “compatible” with “one country, two systems.” What they really were calling for is a radical change of the status quo.
“One country, two systems” is designed, in theory, to safeguard the fundamental rights of Hong Kong’s people. In fact, our rights are gradually being taken away in the name of safeguarding “one country, two systems” — Beijing’s version of it. The policy isn’t dead so much as it is perverse. Which it always has been.
“One country, two systems” was a ploy from the outset, a tactic for China to buy time, the better to absorb Hong Kong sooner or later. Preferably sooner, it seems.
New York Times 第三擊
【China’s Hong Kong Policy Is Perverse. It Always Has Been.】
By Lewis Lau Yiu-man
HONG KONG — Beijing says it wants to safeguard “one country, two systems,” the principle that supposedly guarantees Hong Kong’s semiautonomy from the mainland. In reality it is weaponizing the policy to crush the city’s freedoms.
On Thursday, the Chinese government announced a plan to pass national security laws for Hong Kong. It has long been after something like this, though previously it expected the local authorities to do the job. Not this time. This law would be ratified in Beijing — at worst, as soon as next week.
This sinister move caps several weeks of mounting acts of repression in Hong Kong, in almost all spheres of public life — politics, law, education, the media.
Last week, students sitting for a university-entrance history exam were asked if they agreed with this statement: “Japan did more good than harm to China in the period of 1900-45.” The Hong Kong Education Bureau promptly complained that the question was “leading” and asked that it be stricken from the exam, even though some students had already answered it.
The Education Bureau also claimed that the question “seriously hurt the feelings and dignity of the Chinese people who suffered great pain during the Japanese invasion of China.” For many traditional Chinese patriots there is simply no way the Japanese could have brought any benefit whatsoever to China; to merely ask that question is to somehow prettify the Second Sino-Japanese War of 1937-45.
Never mind that the exam referred to the years between 1900 and 1945, rather than solely to the war. And never mind that there is ample historical evidence showing that Japan’s vast influence on China during that period also served China well in some ways. Sun Yat-sen, the most famous early leader of post-imperial modern China; major actors in China’s socialist movement; even Lu Xun, arguably the greatest writer in modern Chinese literature, were all inspired or shaped to a certain extent by contact with Japan.
More than anything, questions such as this one have been a fixture of history exams in Hong Kong. I studied history at university, and I remember this exam question from 2006: “Some people think Emperor Wen of Sui (541-604) did more harm than good. Do you agree with that?”
Then this week pro-Beijing lawmakers hijacked the election for chairperson of a committee of Hong Kong’s legislative council, calling in security guards to control the scene, and placed at the committee’s head a pro-establishment legislator accused of abuse of power.
“Headliner,” a satirical show of the public broadcaster RTHK, was canceled after Hong Kong authorities complained that it denigrated the Hong Kong police.
And the government, even as it is relaxing various social-distancing rules to fend off Covid-19, just extended restrictions on group gatherings to June 4 — the anniversary of the 1989 massacre at Tiananmen Square. The commemorative protest vigil that has been held that day every year may not take place for the first time in three decades. (It occurred even during the SARS outbreak of 2002-03.)
Next week, Hong Kongers face another blatant effort by Beijing to instill in them patriotism for China and loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party: The local Legislature will consider a bill that would criminalize the misuse of China’s national anthem or insults toward it. And, of course, there is the national security legislation.
The Chinese Communist Party is ambitious, and it is impatient. It doesn’t just want to control Hong Kong; it wants to remodel the minds and souls of the Hong Kong people.
Chinese state media said of the history exam controversy that it was an occasion for Hong Kong to “surgically detoxify” its education system so as to make it “compatible” with “one country, two systems.” What they really were calling for is a radical change of the status quo.
“One country, two systems” is designed, in theory, to safeguard the fundamental rights of Hong Kong’s people. In fact, our rights are gradually being taken away in the name of safeguarding “one country, two systems” — Beijing’s version of it. The policy isn’t dead so much as it is perverse. Which it always has been.
“One country, two systems” was a ploy from the outset, a tactic for China to buy time, the better to absorb Hong Kong sooner or later. Preferably sooner, it seems.
After the end of the martial law period,
a large amount of news media popped up overnight.
In general, the freedom of the press should become more liberal as democracy improves.
But is this the truth?
click here to read more：http://www.thenewslens.com/post/213559/
http://youtube.com/dougakaihou/
My Channel 私のチャンネルです 動画解放軍
環境運動（地球環境、石油掘削、動物実験）というと、現場に行って担当者を攻撃する事が多いです。 プラカードを掲げたり、拡声器でデモを行ったりするなどです。
また、保護団体のステッカーやワッペンを掲げることで自分は保護活動を行っていると考えている人も多いです。
私は
・現場の攻撃は、弱い者いじめ
・ワッペンなどは免罪符みたいなもの
と考えます。 実際、環境団体が反対する活動の恩恵（果実）を普通に生活している人は得ています。
だから、できることは
自分の普段の生活によって何に犠牲を与えているか
を考えることです。 そして、自分自身が少しでも減らすことで全体の影響を下げていくことだと考えます。
使っている機材リスト
http://dkg.pw/kizai.html
動画解放軍公式Web
http://dkg.pw/
Music inspired by occupy central movement
from 28/9/2014 to 15/12/2014. Fighting our freedom, our democracy
with no sound , for hong kong , for the world.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music by : Heartgrey
Logo Design : 阿水
Video: 李掌櫃，游明軒
Thanks to:
Michelle Wong
Steuff
Mouzik ( Jimix, Sigi , John Liao)
MK 阿仁
Mark Anthony Wong
Fatking
Ruby
周容
Special thanks to "SONY" for the gear support!!
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you love it , please share it to your friend and spread to the world
Itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/hk/album/no-sound-feat.-steuff-single/id957959066?l=zh
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/track/2gIpRzHVkgCsEmlGU1KFCX
More about heartgrey:
http://facebook.com/beatboxheartgrey
http://www.instagram.com/heartgrey
http://www.twitter.com/heartgrey_so
More about Steuff:
https://www.facebook.com/SteuffMusic
http//www.instagram.com/Steuff_official
literature movement 在 Pin on Romanticism - Pinterest 的必吃
Oct 17, 2018 - Romantic Movement in English Literature - Romantic Movement dates its origin in 1798 A.D. with the publication of Lyrical Ballads. ... <看更多>