【H&M History + Movies】用電影回顧那些歷史課不會教的事 08/24 ~ 08/30
每週一次的【影史7日談】單元來囉!我會用七部電影或影集,告訴你這禮拜在歷史上發生過哪些重要的歷史事件,讓你在看這些電影或歷史事件時,有更多不一樣的思考空間唷!
.
▶ 79-AUG. 24 #維蘇威火山爆發 Mount Vesuvius Eruption
《#龐貝》Pompeii, 2014
位於義大利半島南部那布勒斯灣的維蘇威火山,於公元79年8月24日爆發(有考古證據顯示事件應為10月);此次火山爆發噴出了每秒1.5百萬噸的火山碎屑,而位在山腳下的龐貝城也在一夜之間被活埋,直到16世紀人們因開闢下水道才讓龐貝城重見天日。
.
▶ 1875-AUG. 25 #泳渡英吉利海峽 Captain Webb Conquers the English Channel
《#韋伯船長》Captain Webb, 2015
人稱「韋伯船長」的馬修韋伯,在1875年8月25日用了不到22小時的時間,從英國的多佛游泳到法國的加萊,成為第一個在沒有輔助器材下泳渡英吉利海峽的人。這項壯舉讓他爆紅,但他在1883年7月24日挑戰尼加拉瓜大瀑布下游泳時淹死,享年35歲。
.
▶ 1914-AUG. 26 #坦能堡會戰 第一次世界大戰 Battle of Tannenberg (WWI)
《#坦能堡》Tannenberg, 1932
第一次世界大戰開戰初期,德軍率先在西線對法作戰旗開得勝,兵力較弱的東普魯士則面臨俄軍的威脅。德軍快速靈活的戰術,大敗來犯的俄軍;他們將這場發生在奧士廷附近的戰役命名為「坦能堡會戰」,以報1410年條頓騎士團被東歐諸國擊敗之仇。
.
▶ 1953-AUG. 27 #羅馬假期 Roman Holiday
《羅馬假期》Roman Holiday, 1953
由1950年代好萊塢知名女星奧黛麗赫本主演的《羅馬假期》,是一部講述歐洲某公國公主與美國記者在義大利羅馬邂逅的愛情故事。電影在1953年8月27日首映,幽默中又帶點政治諷刺的調性,讓本片大受好評,也讓奧黛麗赫本獲得了該屆奧斯卡影后。
.
▶ 1963-AUG. 28 #我有一個夢想 I Have a Dream
《#總統之路》All the Way, 2016
美國在1960年代吹起了黑人民權運動的風潮,由馬丁路德金恩博士等人為首的民權團體,於1963年8月28日發起了向華盛頓進軍的遊行,大約25萬人走上街頭為黑人爭取的工作與自由;馬丁路德金恩也在林肯紀念堂前發表《我有一個夢想》的著名演說。
.
▶ 2005-AUG. 29 #卡崔娜風災 Hurricane Katrina
《#卡崔娜紀事》Trouble the Water, 2008
卡崔娜颶風是2005年8月出現的五級颶風,從大西洋生成後進入溫暖的墨西哥灣,於8月29日在美國南部的路易斯安那州比勒斯登陸;直到8月31日卡崔娜颶風消散,風災造成了幾個美國南部大城嚴重水患,1836人死亡,估計有1250億美金的經濟損失。
.
▶ 1945-AUG. 30 #麥帥抵達日本 General MacArthur landed in Japan
《#日落真相》Emperor, 2012
第二次世界大戰末期,日本承受了廣島和長崎兩次原爆後,於1945年8月15日宣布無條件投降;盟軍最高統帥 道格拉斯麥克阿瑟將軍,於8月30日搭乘專機巴丹號抵達日本厚木機場,展開日本受降,以及推動一系列盟軍佔領日本期間的政治改造事宜。
.
.
你對這七部電影和七則歷史故事有什麼想法呢?
歡迎留言分享與我們討論唷!
#電影 #影評 #movie #history #歷史 #歷史上的今天 #影史7日談
**************
別忘了追蹤XXY的電影相關文字、影像、聲音創作唷!
📣 https://linktr.ee/XXY_filmcrtics
同時也有33部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過113萬的網紅Japanese Calligrapher Takumi,也在其Youtube影片中提到,How to write Kimigayo with gold brush | His Imperial Majesty's Reign | The national anthem of Japan "Kimigayo" (君が代, Japanese pronunciation: [kimiɡaj...
「emperor of japan」的推薦目錄:
emperor of japan 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
(✪‿✪)ノ排程中晝發文 #國際法法理建國 Q&A
Q154: 獨派前輩早就論證大清帝國不是中華帝國,清治時期的台灣不是中國的一部分。 但國共都很愛講清朝就是中國的一個朝代,清代台灣是中國的一部分。 你們那麼愛附和國共的中國(中華)線性史觀,那就繼續吧。我只希望能讓少一點台灣人被你們誤導而已。
A154:
把大清帝國認定是中華帝國 (Empire of China) 的,是世界各國。請你看「馬關條約」的英文版。 🙂
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Shimonoseki
His Majesty the Emperor of Japan and His Majesty the Emperor of China, desiring to restore the blessings of peace to their countries and subjects and to remove all cause for future complications, have named as their Plenipotentiaries for the purpose of concluding a Treaty of Peace, that is to say:
-
為了避免你不知道馬關條約還有英文版,順便提醒你一下♡
在馬關條約的《議定專條》裡,有這麼兩段:
第一、彼此約明,本日署名蓋印之和約添備英文,與該約漢正文、日本正文較對無訛。
第二、彼此約明,日後設有兩國各執漢正文或日本正文有所辯論,即以上開英文約本為憑,以免舛錯,而昭公允。
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E9%A6%AC%E9%97%9C%E6%A2%9D%E7%B4%84
-
https://www.facebook.com/rotpnetwork/photos/a.2763561250403580/2763599057066466
美國國務卿 Philander C. Knox 在 1913 年 2 月 4 日送交美國參議院外交委員會主席 Shelby M. Cullom 的備忘錄中,明白指出「在中國的案子中,所涉及到的是新政府的承認,而非新國家的承認」("...in the case of China the question involved is the recognition of a new Government and not a new State")
-
台澎法理地位不是獨立的問題,是需要終止代管自決建國。
我今年33歲,很多人都比我年長,都想作為我的前輩,對我提出指教,若經過理性溝通,我認同了自然就會接受,在你來我的粉專大言不慚的要把我當成晚輩來提點,就不必了,謝謝(˶‾᷄ ⁻̫ ‾᷅˵)
沒有「國共」請正名中國內戰。
我很早就不說「朝代」這個詞了。
我都說清帝國、明帝國。你剛說什麼「漢人的中國」你是把自己當成明帝國的人民視角嗎?好特別喔,居然把中華民國當作「漢人的復國運動」太奇特了,明帝國國家法人格已經滅亡啦,沒有你說的復國情況。
把中華民國當成台灣人的國家,才是掉入一中兩政權的框架。
如果願意擺脫害怕,重新了解歷史脈絡、台澎法理地位,就會知道,中華人民共和國政權要怎樣主張,那是它的事情,若以為中國主權國家法人格內部的兩個政權的爭吵看做是中國共產黨與中國國民黨的爭吵,那你才是順了中國PRC的意。
PRC主張自己繼承ROC,ROC說台灣是自己的,PRC繼承ROC的話,當然也主張台灣就是自己的。
國台辦處理PRC的台灣地區事務,陸委會處理ROC的大陸地區事務:兩岸同屬一中。
一中國內兩個爭奪代表政府地位的政權間戰爭(中國內戰)
一中國內兩個爭奪執政黨資格的政黨間戰爭(黨爭,國共內戰)用這種視角就是把自己當作中國人喔!
國台辦這麼說最重要的目的,是要將「中國代表權之爭」這個概念拿掉。透過將中華民國政權的滅亡跟中國國民黨敗逃連結來消滅中華民國政權。
所以這不是講錯話喔,這其實是一種概念操作。
像你這樣的主張應該都會很歡呼鼓掌👏🏻以為中華民國真的消失了,哈囉現在是中華民國110年喔。
中華民國政權也沒有真的消失。
中華民國政權想代表的中國沒有台澎領土主權這才事實。
問與答也寫了很多篇告訴大家至今中華人民共和國政權打不過來的原因就是因為台澎領土主權歸屬未定,不屬於任何主權國家,不屬於中國,不是中國內戰的戰場。
而台澎法理地位是至今一直保護台澎七十年的法理狀態,讓美國可以賣武器給我們,讓《美日安保條約》可以也保護到台澎,也不算干涉你認為的台灣國的國界,因為台澎還未建國。
✅延伸閱讀:
👉🏻駁斥大錯特錯之 1949 無意識建國論 https://wp.me/pd1HGm-do
👉🏻駁斥1949無意識建國理論part1 https://www.facebook.com/100047156705396/posts/315374003377821/?d=n
👉🏻駁斥1949無意識建國理論part2 https://www.facebook.com/100047156705396/posts/318956496352905/?d=n
(關鍵字搜尋🔍國際法法理建國,敬請期待明天的問與答)
希望大家可以看的資訊❣️
🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻[英語繁中字]為什麼台灣在國際上無法加入WHO?原因與解決方法:https://youtu.be/lss2OdMhi90
👉🏻部落格 https://journeyshin.wordpress.com
👉🏻聖峰演講實錄Podcast:
https://anchor.fm/rotpnetwork-shin-hong-ng/episodes/2019-03-29-ep8kln
👉🏻Apple podcast:https://reurl.cc/a5qZjQ
👉🏻 《台澎法理建國指南》電子書:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yFXTxYOtkqrwEyV11w0kQyKujxEZsU8N/view?usp=sharing
👉🏻《台澎主權的未來請交給台澎人民決定》漫畫:
http://www.rotpnetwork.tw/TPSovDBYTP.php?LAN=TW
emperor of japan 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最讚貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
emperor of japan 在 Japanese Calligrapher Takumi Youtube 的最佳貼文
How to write Kimigayo with gold brush | His Imperial Majesty's Reign | The national anthem of Japan
"Kimigayo" (君が代, Japanese pronunciation: [kimiɡajo]; "His Imperial Majesty's Reign") is the national anthem of Japan. The lyrics of "Kimigayo" are probably the oldest among the world's national anthems, and with a length of 32 characters, they are also the world's shortest. The lyrics are from a waka poem written by an unnamed author in the Heian period (794–1185), and the current melody was chosen in 1880, replacing an unpopular melody composed by John William Fenton eleven years earlier. Its length of 11 measures is currently among the world's shortest. While the title "Kimigayo" is usually translated as "His Imperial Majesty's Reign", no official translation of the title or lyrics has been established in law.
From 1888 to 1945, "Kimigayo" served as the national anthem of the Empire of Japan. When the Empire was dissolved following its surrender at the end of World War II, the State of Japan succeeded it in 1945. This successor state was a parliamentary democracy, and the polity therefore changed from a system based on imperial sovereignty to one based on popular sovereignty. However, the U.S. occupation forces allowed Emperor Hirohito to retain the throne and "Kimigayo" remained the de facto national anthem. The passage of the Act on National Flag and Anthem in 1999 recognized it as the official national and imperial anthem.
(From Wikipedia)
#handwriting #calligraphy #Japan
emperor of japan 在 Fischer's-フィッシャーズ- Youtube 的最讚貼文
二代目のチャンネルもよろしく!
☆Fischer's-セカンダリ-
■https://goo.gl/QgBhjD
☆チャンネル登録よろしくね!
■https://goo.gl/lSy9St
☆専用の絵文字や色々!チャンネルメンバーシップはこちら!
■https://goo.gl/uJomwo
☆Tシャツ、パーカーなどのフィッシャーズグッズ!
■http://bit.ly/2pdgURz
☆フィッシャーズメンバーのTwitterはこちら!
ーシルクロード@RytoSle2(リーダー)
■https://twitter.com/RytoSle2
ーマサイ@MASAI_Fischers
■https://twitter.com/MASAI_Fischers
ーンダホ@ndahoFischers
■https://twitter.com/ndahoFischers
ーモトキ@Fs_hasninelives
■https://twitter.com/Fs_hasninelives
ーぺけたん@peketanFischers
■https://twitter.com/peketanFischers
ーザカオ@fischerszakao
■https://twitter.com/fischerszakao
ーダーマ@M2DAMA
■https://twitter.com/M2DAMA
↓フィッシャーズ公式アカウントは下へ↓
☆おすすめ動画はこちら!
①【全員参加】モトキに100の質問連発で答えてもらいます!!
https://youtu.be/a8THrT3ntWo
②【全員参加】ぺけたんに100の質問連発で答えてもらいます!!
https://youtu.be/-jztEGKMmsE
【Fischer's-フィッシャーズ-】
出来そうで出来なさそう、くだらない事、好きなことをする…。
中学三年の頃、「楽しい」を動画にすることから始まった古くて幼稚園、同い年の同級生からなるネットパフォーマー集団です。メンバーは全員で7人!
[シルクロード] [ンダホ] [ダーマ] [ザカオ] [ぺけたん] [モトキ] [マサイ]
【公式アカウント】
ーTwitter(動画公開時の通知+告知など)
■https://twitter.com/FischersHome
ーFacebook(動画公開時の通知)
■https://www.facebook.com/FischersHome
ーInstagram(オフショット)
■https://www.instagram.com/fischershome
ーウェブサイト・メンバー紹介
■http://fischers.web.fc2.com/
【再生リスト】
―すべて表示(西暦別もあります)
■https://goo.gl/fB9HYY
―アップロード順
■https://goo.gl/TuFZ4W
―再生数順
■https://goo.gl/pw3hyy
【音源・効果音使用元】様
―DOVA-SYNDROME
■http://dova-s.jp/
―効果音ラボ
■http://soundeffect-lab.info/
―甘茶の音楽工房
■http://amachamusic.chagasi.com/
―魔王魂
■http://maoudamashii.jokersounds.com/
―Epidemic Sound
■ http://www.epidemicsound.com
【一部の動画・静止画素材提供元】
PIXTA
※動画によって使用していない場合がございます。
【お問い合わせ先について】
※1 業界の皆様・ご依頼の方々・その他ご相談がある方は、UUUMウェブサイトにある「サービス」からお願い致します。
※2 YouTubeメッセージ機能は、フィッシャーズでは利用していません。ご理解いただけると幸いです。
【サービスに関するお問い合わせ(UUUM)】
http://www.uuum.co.jp/
#Fischers #フィッシャーズ #100の質問
emperor of japan 在 Kento Bento Youtube 的精選貼文
Our Merch: https://standard.tv/kentobento
Our Patreon: https://patreon.com/kentobento
Nebula: https://watchnebula.com/kentobento
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kentobento2015
Business Inquiries: kentobento@standard.tv
Download Dashlane for free to manage all your passwords: https://dashlane.com/kentobento
Use the promo code "KENTOBENTO" to get 10% off Dashlane Premium.
Other videos you may like:
The Incredible Japanese Prison Break: https://youtu.be/oI8trlbCbU8
Has KFC Conquered Asia?: https://youtu.be/4iYt9eINS8M
The Greatest Bank Heist in Chinese History: https://youtu.be/qW0uzPJEO10
Where Are The Asian Borders?: https://youtu.be/vPupwlZlNMY
These Events Will Happen in Asia in 2019: https://youtu.be/HkUksxJrdmc
Stock Media Footage:
Videoblocks: https://www.videoblocks.com
Music:
Epidemic Sound: http://epidemicsound.com
Channel Description:
Animated documentary-style videos on extraordinary Asian events.
Credits:
Kento Bento — Researcher, writer, narrator, audio editor, video editor, motion graphics & art director
Charlie Rodriguez — Illustrator
Isambard Dexter — Research assistant
Jorrit van Ginkel — Music assistant
Nina Bento — Cheerleader
Video Title: These Events Will Happen in Asia in 2020 (part 1)
"As you probably know, this video will be different from normal, because it won’t just be about one event, but multiple events in the near future, all happening in Asia in 2020. Now of course predicting such events month-by-month is extremely difficult, but we can always give our best estimates based on the information we currently have."
In this video, we cover some of the following:
- Burj Khalifa, Al Marjan Island & fireworks (UAE)
- Kim Jong-un New Year's Address (North Korea)
- Xi Jinping's battle with Winnie the Pooh (China)
- Taiwan & China's conflict
- Hong Kong protests
- South China Sea Dispute between China & ASEAN
- Mekong River dams (Laos)
- Mount Everest landfill (Nepal)
- Indian's water crisis
- World's highest bridge (Kashmir)
- Beidou Satellite System (China)
- Fastest train in the world (China)
- The new Japanese Emperor
- Central Asia & Lonely Planet
- Bhutan & phalli
- Andrew Yang in the Democratic presidential primaries
- BTS and mandatory military service (South Korea)
- US' Huawei Ban
- Azerbaijan's first lady and vice president
- Tajikistan's very tasty president
- ABU International Song Contest (China)
- China's Beidou Satellite System
+ more!
emperor of japan 在 Naruhito | Reign, History, & Family | Britannica 的相關結果
Naruhito, original name Hironomiya Naruhito, (born February 23, 1960, Tokyo, Japan), emperor of Japan from 2019. He is Japan's 126th emperor, and, according to ... ... <看更多>
emperor of japan 在 Who's Who in the Japanese Royal Family - Town & Country ... 的相關結果
The current Emperor of Japan, Naruhito is the eldest son of former Emperor Akhito and his wife former Empress Michiko. ... <看更多>
emperor of japan 在 Emperor of Japan - Wikipedia 的相關結果
Naruhito is the current emperor of Japan. He acceded to the Chrysanthemum Throne upon the abdication of his father Emperor Akihito on 1 May 2019. The role of ... ... <看更多>