【《金融時報》深度長訪】
今年做過數百外媒訪問,若要說最能反映我思緒和想法的訪問,必然是《金融時報》的這一個,沒有之一。
在排山倒海的訪問裡,這位記者能在短短個半小時裡,刻畫得如此傳神,值得睇。
Joshua Wong plonks himself down on a plastic stool across from me. He is there for barely 10 seconds before he leaps up to greet two former high school classmates in the lunchtime tea house melee. He says hi and bye and then bounds back. Once again I am facing the young man in a black Chinese collared shirt and tan shorts who is proving such a headache for the authorities in Beijing.
So far, it’s been a fairly standard week for Wong. On a break from a globe-trotting, pro-democracy lobbying tour, he was grabbed off the streets of Hong Kong and bundled into a minivan. After being arrested, he appeared on the front pages of the world’s newspapers and was labelled a “traitor” by China’s foreign ministry.
He is very apologetic about being late for lunch.
Little about Wong, the face of Hong Kong’s democracy movement, can be described as ordinary: neither his Nobel Peace Prize nomination, nor his three stints in prison. Five years ago, his face was plastered on the cover of Time magazine; in 2017, he was the subject of a hit Netflix documentary, Joshua: Teenager vs Superpower. And he’s only 23.
We’re sitting inside a Cantonese teahouse in the narrow back streets near Hong Kong’s parliament, where he works for a pro-democracy lawmaker. It’s one of the most socially diverse parts of the city and has been at the heart of five months of unrest, which has turned into a battle for Hong Kong’s future. A few weekends earlier I covered clashes nearby as protesters threw Molotov cocktails at police, who fired back tear gas. Drunk expats looked on, as tourists rushed by dragging suitcases.
The lunch crowd pours into the fast-food joint, milling around as staff set up collapsible tables on the pavement. Construction workers sit side-by-side with men sweating in suits, chopsticks in one hand, phones in the other. I scan the menu: instant noodles with fried egg and luncheon meat, deep fried pork chops, beef brisket with radish. Wong barely glances at it before selecting the hometown fried rice and milk tea, a Hong Kong speciality with British colonial roots, made with black tea and evaporated or condensed milk.
“I always order this,” he beams, “I love this place, it’s the only Cantonese teahouse in the area that does cheap, high-quality milk tea.” I take my cue and settle for the veggie and egg fried rice and a lemon iced tea as the man sitting on the next table reaches over to shake Wong’s hand. Another pats him on the shoulder as he brushes by to pay the bill.
Wong has been a recognisable face in this city since he was 14, when he fought against a proposal from the Hong Kong government to introduce a national education curriculum that would teach that Chinese Communist party rule was “superior” to western-style democracy. The government eventually backed down after more than 100,000 people took to the streets. Two years later, Wong rose to global prominence when he became the poster boy for the Umbrella Movement, in which tens of thousands of students occupied central Hong Kong for 79 days to demand genuine universal suffrage.
That movement ended in failure. Many of its leaders were sent to jail, among them Wong. But the seeds of activism were planted in the generation of Hong Kongers who are now back on the streets, fighting for democracy against the world’s most powerful authoritarian state. The latest turmoil was sparked by a controversial extradition bill but has evolved into demands for true suffrage and a showdown with Beijing over the future of Hong Kong. The unrest in the former British colony, which was handed over to China in 1997, represents the biggest uprising on Chinese soil since the 1989 pro-democracy movement in Beijing. Its climax, of course, was the Tiananmen Square massacre, when hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people were killed.
“We learnt a lot of lessons from the Umbrella Movement: how to deal with conflict between the more moderate and progressive camps, how to be more organic, how to be less hesitant,” says Wong. “Five years ago the pro-democracy camp was far more cautious about seeking international support because they were afraid of pissing off Beijing.”
Wong doesn’t appear to be afraid of irking China. Over the past few months, he has lobbied on behalf of the Hong Kong protesters to governments around the world. In the US, he testified before Congress and urged lawmakers to pass an act in support of the Hong Kong protesters — subsequently approved by the House of Representatives with strong bipartisan support. In Germany, he made headlines when he suggested two baby pandas in the Berlin Zoo be named “Democracy” and “Freedom.” He has been previously barred from entering Malaysia and Thailand due to pressure from Beijing, and a Singaporean social worker was recently convicted and fined for organising an event at which Wong spoke via Skype.
The food arrives almost immediately. I struggle to tell our orders apart. Two mouthfuls into my egg and cabbage fried rice, I regret not ordering the instant noodles with luncheon meat.
In August, a Hong Kong newspaper controlled by the Chinese Communist party published a photo of Julie Eadeh, an American diplomat, meeting pro-democracy student leaders including Wong. The headline accused “foreign forces” of igniting a revolution in Hong Kong. “Beijing says I was trained by the CIA and the US marines and I am a CIA agent. [I find it] quite boring because they have made up these kinds of rumours for seven years [now],” he says, ignoring his incessantly pinging phone.
Another thing that bores him? The media. Although Wong’s messaging is always on point, his appraisal of journalists in response to my questions is piercing and cheeky. “In 15-minute interviews I know journalists just need soundbites that I’ve repeated lots of times before. So I’ll say things like ‘I have no hope [as regards] the regime but I have hope towards the people.’ Then the journalists will say ‘oh that’s so impressive!’ And I’ll say ‘yes, I’m a poet.’ ”
And what about this choice of restaurant? “Well, I knew I couldn’t pick a five-star hotel, even though the Financial Times is paying and I know you can afford it,” he says grinning. “It’s better to do this kind of interview in a Hong Kong-style restaurant. This is the place that I conducted my first interview after I left prison.” Wong has spent around 120 days in prison in total, including on charges of unlawful assembly.
“My fellow prisoners would tell me about how they joined the Umbrella Movement and how they agreed with our beliefs. I think prisoners are more aware of the importance of human rights,” he says, adding that even the prison wardens would share with him how they had joined protests.
“Even the triad members in prison support democracy. They complain how the tax on cigarettes is extremely high and the tax on red wine is extremely low; it just shows how the upper-class elite lives here,” he says, as a waiter strains to hear our conversation. Wong was most recently released from jail in June, the day after the largest protests in the history of Hong Kong, when an estimated 2m people — more than a quarter of the territory’s 7.5m population — took to the streets.
Raised in a deeply religious family, he used to travel to mainland China every two years with his family and church literally to spread the gospel. As with many Hong Kong Chinese who trace their roots to the mainland, he doesn’t know where his ancestral village is. His lasting memory of his trips across the border is of dirty toilets, he tells me, mid-bite. He turned to activism when he realised praying didn’t help much.
“The gift from God is to have independence of mind and critical thinking; to have our own will and to make our own personal judgments. I don’t link my religious beliefs with my political judgments. Even Carrie Lam is Catholic,” he trails off, in a reference to Hong Kong’s leader. Lam has the lowest approval rating of any chief executive in the history of the city, thanks to her botched handling of the crisis.
I ask whether Wong’s father, who is also involved in social activism, has been a big influence. Wrong question.
“The western media loves to frame Joshua Wong joining the fight because of reading the books of Nelson Mandela or Martin Luther King or because of how my parents raised me. In reality, I joined street activism not because of anyone book I read. Why do journalists always assume anyone who strives for a better society has a role model?” He glances down at his pinging phone and draws a breath, before continuing. “Can you really describe my dad as an activist? I support LGBTQ rights,” he says, with a fist pump. His father, Roger Wong, is a well-known anti-gay rights campaigner in Hong Kong.
I notice he has put down his spoon, with half a plate of fried rice untouched. I decide it would be a good idea to redirect our conversation by bonding over phone addictions. Wong, renowned for his laser focus and determination, replies to my emails and messages at all hours and has been described by his friends as “a robot.”
He scrolls through his Gmail, his inbox filled with unread emails, showing me how he categorises interview requests with country tags. His life is almost solely dedicated to activism. “My friends and I used to go to watch movies and play laser tag but now of course we don’t have time to play any more: we face real bullets every weekend.”
The protests — which have seen more than 3,300 people arrested — have been largely leaderless. “Do you ever question your relevance to the movement?” I venture, mid-spoonful of congealed fried rice.
“Never,” he replies with his mouth full. “We have a lot of facilitators in this movement and I’m one of them . . . it’s just like Wikipedia. You don’t know who the contributors are behind a Wikipedia page but you know there’s a lot of collaboration and crowdsourcing. Instead of just having a top-down command, we now have a bottom-up command hub which has allowed the movement to last far longer than Umbrella.
“With greater power comes greater responsibility, so the question is how, through my role, can I express the voices of the frontliners, of the street activism? For example, I defended the action of storming into the Legislative Council on July 1. I know I didn’t storm in myself . . . ” His phone pings twice. Finally he succumbs.
After tapping away for about 30 seconds, Wong launches back into our conversation, sounding genuinely sorry that he wasn’t there on the night when protesters destroyed symbols of the Chinese Communist party and briefly occupied the chamber.
“My job is to be the middleman to express, evaluate and reveal what is going on in the Hong Kong protests when the movement is about being faceless,” he says, adding that his Twitter storm of 29 tweets explaining the July 1 occupation reached at least four million people. I admit that I am overcome with exhaustion just scanning his Twitter account, which has more than 400,000 followers. “Well, that thread was actually written by Jeffrey Ngo from Demosisto,” he say, referring to the political activism group that he heads.
A network of Hong Kong activists studying abroad helps fuel his relentless public persona on social media and in the opinion pages of international newspapers. Within a week of his most recent arrest, he had published op-eds in The Economist, The New York Times, Quartz and the Apple Daily.
I wonder out loud if he ever feels overwhelmed at taking on the Chinese Communist party, a task daunting even for some of the world’s most formidable governments and companies. He peers at me over his wire-framed glasses. “It’s our responsibility; if we don’t do it, who will? At least we are not in Xinjiang or Tibet; we are in Hong Kong,” he says, referring to two regions on Chinese soil on the frontline of Beijing’s drive to develop a high-tech surveillance state. In Xinjiang, at least one million people are being held in internment camps. “Even though we’re directly under the rule of Beijing, we have a layer of protection because we’re recognised as a global city so [Beijing] is more hesitant to act.”
I hear the sound of the wok firing up in the kitchen and ask him the question on everyone’s minds in Hong Kong: what happens next? Like many people who are closely following the extraordinary situation in Hong Kong, he is hesitant to make firm predictions.
“Lots of think-tanks around the world say ‘Oh, we’re China experts. We’re born in western countries but we know how to read Chinese so we’re familiar with Chinese politics.’ They predicted the Communist party would collapse after the Tiananmen Square massacre and they’ve kept predicting this over the past three decades but hey, now it’s 2019 and we’re still under the rule of Beijing, ha ha,” he grins.
While we are prophesying, does Wong ever think he might become chief executive one day? “No local journalist in Hong Kong would really ask this question,” he admonishes. As our lunch has progressed, he has become bolder in dissecting my interview technique. The territory’s chief executive is currently selected by a group of 1,200, mostly Beijing loyalists, and he doubts the Chinese Communist party would ever allow him to run. A few weeks after we meet he announces his candidacy in the upcoming district council elections. He was eventually the only candidate disqualified from running — an order that, after our lunch, he tweeted had come from Beijing and was “clearly politically driven”.
We turn to the more ordinary stuff of 23-year-olds’ lives, as Wong slurps the remainder of his milk tea. “Before being jailed, the thing I was most worried about was that I wouldn’t be able to watch Avengers: Endgame,” he says.
“Luckily, it came out around early May so I watched it two weeks before I was locked up in prison.” He has already quoted Spider-Man twice during our lunch. I am unsurprised when Wong picks him as his favourite character.
“I think he’s more . . . ” He pauses, one of the few times in the interview. “Compared to having an unlimited superpower or unlimited power or unlimited talent just like Superman, I think Spider-Man is more human.” With that, our friendly neighbourhood activist dashes off to his next interview.
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過11萬的網紅小島よしおのおっぱっぴー小学校,也在其Youtube影片中提到,好きな人に想いを伝える。 いろんな伝え方があるから面白いよー! 動物から楽しく学ぶ。 「ワニやダチョウの告白動画はこちらから http://www.actoflove.jp/ 「ワニ」「ダチョウ」をタップしてね 他にも いろんな動物の告白が見られるよ」 上田恵介、小宮輝之、大渕希郷 ...
act of zoo 在 Protoss神族 Facebook 的精選貼文
3月26日見🤟
美國Metalcore樂隊 Emmure ,下個月26號將會降臨 Hidden Agenda 演出,幾年前曾經喺Hidden Agenda睇過佢地嘅話,應該都會記得全場同步喪跳有幾瘋狂、Bass佬平地插水有幾瘋狂。
今次OC2S仲搵埋 @protosshk 同泰國Alternative Metal樂隊 Defying Decay 同場。鍾意大汗淋漓Metal show嘅觀眾千祈唔好錯過!
We are only a month away from American Metalcore band Emmure’s 2nd live in HK. If you’re lucky enough to have seen them live for once, you’d have witnessed their raw, out of the world stage energy.
Only this time around, we decided to add in local metal group Protoss and alternative metal band Defying Decay from Thailand.
Don’t miss out!
Emmure 「Look At Yourself」Asia Tour 2019 - Live in Hong Kong
樂隊Bands: Emmure (US)、Protoss神族(HK)、Defying Decay(Thai)(Opening Act)
日期Date : 26 March 2019
時間Time : OPEN1930pm / START2030PM
地點Venue: This Town Needs ( Yau Tong, Hong Kong, 1F, Commercial Accommodation, Ocean One, 6 Shung Shun Street)
入場費Entrance Fee: Adv $320 - / Walk-in $400
線上購票Online Tickets:www.juven.co/emmure
門市購票 TICKET IN-STORE
Zoo Records (ADV)
Tel : 2309 2911
旺角彌敦道608號Chic 之堡3樓325號鋪
Shop 325, Level 3, No.608 Nathan Road, Mong Kok
White Noise Records (ADV)
Tel: 2591 0499
九龍上海街720號1樓(太子站C2出口, 近旺角维景酒店)
1/F, 720 Shanghai Street, Kowloon (Prince Edward C2 EXIT, close to Metropark Hotel Mongkok)
觸Studio - 先達店 (ADV)
Tel: 2395 3332
Room 311, Sincere House, 83 Argyle Street, Mong Kok, Kowloon. (Mong Kok MTR Exit D2)
九龍旺角亞皆老街83號 先施大廈311室 (港鐵旺角站D2出口)
act of zoo 在 雙語活動女王 周明璟 Sophia Facebook 的最佳貼文
HARAMBE死了。
-by Captain Paul Watson
(翻譯:周明璟 Sophia )
因為一位不負責任、怠職的母親任由自己四歲兒子嬉戲墜落動物園猩猩柵欄區,大猩猩Harambe被射殺慘死。
請大家想一想。
這位母親任由她四歲小孩攀爬過隔欄墜入15呎深的猩猩欄區。先不說裡面有隻大猩猩,小孩爬過欄杆到失足墜落的過程中,這名媽媽到底在幹嘛?
她該被控告疏忽怠職及虐待兒童(Child Abuse)。身為家長我亦無法理解為何事件發生時其他家長竟只呆站和尖叫。若是我一定毫不猶豫跳下去,且我最擔心的不是猩猩而是小孩墜落15呎深的可怕傷勢。身為家長無法想像為何竟讓小孩嬉戲亂晃,這名媽媽在簡訊嗎?還是忙著用手機聊天?
這名母親要大眾尊重她的隱私。她感謝老天爺和上帝讓她的寶貝回到她身邊。女人,救你小孩的不是老天。是大猩猩HARAMBE試著在幫你的孩子!然後某個持槍的白痴決定以多數美國警察和保安人員處理事情的方式,以致命武器射殺HARAMBE。
Harambe死了,就在他才剛歡度17歲生日的隔一天,因為辛辛那堤動物園的無能無知。如果他們了解大猩猩習性。他們就會發現HARAMBE不但完全沒有要傷害小男孩的意圖甚至於在保護小孩。
我們看到一隻大猩猩保護人類小孩的無比愛心。這樣的善意得到的回報竟然是一顆子彈。
因為一群自私圍觀人的尖叫聲引發了恐怖心寒的處置-Harambe死了。當時管理員在哪?他們一定會看見Harambe毫無惡意。該死的動物園請來的是什麼無知的懦夫?
Harambe死了,野生動物根本不該被囚禁在人類的動物園。
Harambe本該和同伴生活在非洲低地森林裡,過著大猩猩無憂無慮的生活,而不是被抓來當作奇異表演秀的主角,被無知自私的人類逗弄、觀賞、自拍。
這樣扭曲的生態讓我看見人類的可悲。
Harambe被愚蠢、無感的人開槍冷血屠殺。
動物園為了脫罪在聲明中說「大猩猩暴力的拖行和甩弄小男孩。」目擊證人表示這並非事實,若是這隻400磅的大猩猩有傷害他,小男孩怎麼可能很快的出院且毫髮無傷?
Harambe會死就是因為人類囚禁動物只為娛樂自己。
可想而知動物園將祭出名人Jack Hanna來引導輿論。他們在人命和猩猩的命之間做了對的選擇。
錯!小男孩並不會被猩猩殺害,事實上過去也從未有猩猩殺害小孩的事件,即便在野生環境這種大猩猩是友善的。
Jack Hanna拿了錢來誤導輿論。如果他瞭解猩猩習性,他就會知道Harambe做了什麼。
那個手被Harambe溫柔握著小男孩呢?他目睹了友善溫和保護自己的大猩猩在眼前被槍殺,只因為幾個愚人把Harambe當做金剛、還以為自己在拯救美人。小男孩將承受什麼後遺症?
當我知道這高尚的生物其實試著在幫助小男孩,他的善意卻被回以子彈,我好難過,我的眼眶濕了。
我對辛辛那提動物園、槍殺Harambe的人、還有引起這次事件的肇因者-滿嘴荒謬藉口的失職母親感到厭惡。
我為小男孩感到可悲,成年前他必須和失職讓他落入猩猩柵欄的女人相處14年。而那個溫柔握著他小手的猩猩Harambe已經死了。
(翻譯:周明璟 Sophia )
----------------------
這個事件讓我非常憤怒和難過,或許,或許這位母親真的是疏忽。但沒有動物該因為人類而慘死。
HARAMBE IS DEAD
Commentary by Captain Paul Watson
Harambe is dead because an irresponsible and negligent mother allowed her 4-year old son to fall into a Gorilla enclosure.
Think about that for a moment.
This mother allowed her “4-year old ” son to climb over a fence and approach a 15 foot drop onto a concrete floor. Forget about the fact that there was a gorilla down there, what the hell was she doing while her child made his way towards what could be a fatal fall.
She should be charged with criminal negligence and child abuse.
As a parent I find it incomprehensible that another parent would stand there and do nothing but scream. I would have immediately and without hesitation have jumped into that enclosure to protect my child, no matter the risks and It would not have been the gorilla that would worry me but rather the consequence of the 15-foot drop. But again as a parent I can’t even imagine how a 4-year old child was able to wander away . Was she texting someone or chatting on her cell phone?
Now this woman wants us to respect her privacy. She thanked the Lord for delivering her baby back to her. Well woman, it was not the Lord. Harambe was trying to help your child until some idiots with guns decided to settle the issue the way most police and security in America tend to settle an issue – with deadly force.
Harambe is dead, a day after his 17th birthday, because the people who run the Cincinnati Zoo are grossly incompetent. If they had any knowledge and understanding about lowland gorillas they would have quickly observed that Harambe meant no harm to the child and was in fact protecting him.
What we saw was an incredible act of compassion by a gorilla for a human child. An act of kindness and concern that was rewarded with a bullet.
Harambe is dead because of a bunch of ignorant human gawkers kept screaming, thus motivating the horrific response. Where were the keepers? Surely they could see that Harambe was not behaving violently. What kind of ignorant and incompetent cowards do they have working at that damn zoo anyhow?
Harambe is dead because zoos are no place for wild animals to be imprisoned.
Harambe should have been in the lowland jungles of Africa, with his own kind doing what gorillas were born to do and that means being a gorilla, not some character in a freak show so a bunch a gawking ignorant anthropocentric hominids can stare, tease, laugh, and take selfies.
I swear it is incidents like these that make me see how utterly pathetic and clueless human beings can be.
The killing of Harambe was cold-blooded, unprovoked and senseless murder and the fingers of those who pulled the trigger belong to a special kind of stupid.
The zoo feebly tried to defend the shooting in a release where they stated: “The gorilla was violently dragging and throwing the child.”
This was not what eye witnesses saw and the proof that this statement is a lie is the very fact that the child was released from the hospital shortly after, unharmed, and if a 400 pound gorilla was actually being violent there is no way that child would have remained unharmed.
Harambe died because we enslave gorillas and other animals for our entertainment.
Predictably the zoos trotted out their go-to apologist Jack Hanna to proclaim that the zoo did the right thing, that it was a choice between a gorilla and a human being.
No it was not. The kid was not going to be killed by this gorilla. In fact there is no case of a gorilla in captivity ever killing a child and these gorillas are actually approachable in the wild.
But Jack Hanna gets paid to spew such nonsense because if he actually knew anything about gorillas he would have understood what Harambe was trying to do.
And what about the child whose hand Harambe gently held in his own? What kind of trauma will this boy experience from seeing the gentle being who tried to help him gunned down because a few pathetic individuals wanted to pretend Harambe was King Kong and the they were stupidly trying to save Faye Wray.
What brings tears to my eyes, what makes me sick inside is the knowledge that this noble creature was trying to help, that he knew the child was in trouble and his compassion was contemptuously dismissed with bullets.
I am disgusted with the Cincinnati zoo, disgusted with the men who killed Harambe, and disgusted with this pathetic excuse for a mother who is the root cause of this tragedy.
I feel pity for the boy, because for the next 14 years or so he will have to live with this woman and with the knowledge that because she allowed him to fall into that enclosure Harambe, the kindly creature that held his hand, is now dead.
act of zoo 在 小島よしおのおっぱっぴー小学校 Youtube 的最佳解答
好きな人に想いを伝える。
いろんな伝え方があるから面白いよー!
動物から楽しく学ぶ。
「ワニやダチョウの告白動画はこちらから
http://www.actoflove.jp/
「ワニ」「ダチョウ」をタップしてね
他にも いろんな動物の告白が見られるよ」
上田恵介、小宮輝之、大渕希郷
『Act of Love –A visual dictionary of animal courtship』(HUMAN RESEARCH、2015年9月25日)
動画監修協力:大渕希郷」
「テレビ朝日『アニマルふしぎZOO鑑』
2020年7月11日ごご2:30〜ごご4:00放送
地球に存在する色々な動物のナゼ?ナニ?という不思議な行動、生態を大調査して映像ZOO鑑にまとめる番組です!」
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec3c1/ec3c1ae1fabe3ba3c52572cd17fd2bebbf397ba2" alt="post-title"
act of zoo 在 OmegaGamesWiki™ Youtube 的最佳解答
PS4 PRO版のTHE LAST OF US PART 2の難易度サバイバル、ノーダメージ&100%収集品攻略動画です、Part 11。
車上戦で避け切れない攻撃があり( 28:15)、被ダメしてしまったため、この動画につきましてはノーダメージを外しましたが、それ以外の戦闘パートはいつも通りノーダメージとステルスでクリアしています。
過激なムービーシーンがYouTubeのガイドライン違反になる可能性があるため、そういうシーンは編集でカットします、申し訳ございません。
PART 11
・CHATPER 23: Tracking Lesson
・CHATPER 24: The Stadium 13:09
・CHATPER 25: On Foot 30:06
・CHATPER 26: The Forward Base 56:10
・NEW GAME
・SURVIVOR DIFFICULTY
・STEALTHY WAY
・100% COLLECTIBLES(127 Artifacts, 20 Journal Entries, 48 Trading Cards, 32 Coins, 14 Safes, 8 Training Manuals, 25 Workbenches, 12 Weapons)
収集品/COLLECTIBLES:
CHAPTER 23 - Tracking Lesson(全4個)
1) Artifact: Owen’s Drawing of Abby(82/127)0:24
2) Artifact: Thank You Card from Mel(83/127)0:31
3) Artifact: Zoo Holiday Brochure(84/127)1:20
4) Coin: Virginia(1/32)2:03
CHAPTER 24 - The Stadium(全4個)
1) Coin: Alaska(2/32)20:22
2) Coin: Maine(3/32)21:26
3) Coin: New Jersey(4/32)23:17
4) Coin: Vermont(5/32)24:13
・トロフィー「新品同様」/Trophy "Mint Condition" 24:13
・トロフィー「シャープシューター」/Trophy "Sharpshooter" 24:49
CHAPTER 25 - On Foot(全7個+サバイバルガイド, 武器1個,)
1) Coin: Kentucky(6/32)30:07
2) Coin: Massachusetts(7/32)37:06
3) Workbench(14/25)41:32
4) Coin: Ohio(8/32)44:44
5) Training Manual: Covert Ops 46:09
6) Coin: Indiana(9/32)49:12
7) Artifact: WLF Gun Cache Note(85/127)49:25
8) Safe (Password = 17-38-07) 49:54
9) Weapon: Hunting Pistol 50:14
CHAPTER 26 - The Forward Base(全5個)
1) Coin: California(10/32)58:13
2) Coin: New Mexico(11/32)59:27
3) Workbench(15/25)1:00:12
4) Coin: South Carolina(12/32)1:05:04
5) Artifact: WLF Interrogator Letter(86/127)1:05:22
サムネイル製作:K.K
LAST OF US PART II - SURVIVOR DIFFICULT NO DAMAGE 100% COLLECTIBLES WALKTHROUGH PLAYLIST:
⇒https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4fd59i0eA3Vh4HZ0-w3Ro53FJSA-AQnd
LAST OF US REMASTERED - GROUNDED DIFFICULT NO DAMAGE NO UPGRADE 100% COLLECTIBLES WALKTHROUGH PLAYLIST:
⇒https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4fd59i0eA3X7ueDVvMwh_kZ_1Pm2VvOz
======================
- ゲームタイトル: ラストオブアス パーツ2/THE LAST OF US PART 2(PS4版)
- 発売日: 2020年6月19日
- 価格: PS4版:6,900円+税
- ジャンル : サバイバルアクション
- ESRB : Cero Z
- 開発: NAUGHTY DOG
- 発売: (株)ソニー・インタラクティブエンタテインメント
=======================
#LastOfUsPart2 #SURVIVOR #AllCollectibles
=======================
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976,
allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise
be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance
in favor of fair use."
=======================
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18652/186523c7e23a509f1c45a4855ea4297ab7bb3f90" alt="post-title"