關於 above beyond agency ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

PRESS STATEMENT (IN REPLY TO RONNIE LIU)

I refer to the press statement from the State Assemblyman of Sungai Pelek, titled “Muhyiddin must come clean on the COVID-19 vaccine.” The State Assemblyman has claimed several inaccuracies, allegations, and misrepresentations that require answering in this statement.

I will answer them one by one.

1. The State Assemblyman has alleged that the mRNA vaccine will alter the DNA of a person. He has also questioned whether it will be approved by JAKIM based on the same premise.

Briefly, in our cells, mRNAs (messenger RNAs) are temporary molecules that are made from our genomic DNA before it is translated to make a protein. It is essentially a short-term, temporary message.
In this case, the temporary message instructs the body to produce one of the proteins on the surface of the coronavirus. The immune system will then learn to recognise the virus protein and produce antibodies against it. That’s all the mRNA vaccine does. It does not alter your DNA.

In response to State Assemblyman’s query if JAKIM will approve the vaccine since “it is capable of altering the DNA of a person?” The DNA issue has been addressed above. In addition, I have already stated that JAKIM is part of the Jawatankuasa Khas Jaminan Akses Bekalan Vaksin COVID-19 (JKJAV) which assesses COVID-19 vaccines. Furthermore, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) YB Datuk Seri Dr Zulkifli Mohamad Al-Bakri clarified in Parliament, the Muzakarah (Conference) of the National Fatwa Council will study and deliberate on the matter.

2. The State Assemblyman has also questioned who will be paying for the vaccine. If he read beyond the headlines of the announcement, he would have seen that the Prime Minister has pledged that the Government will fund the public COVID-19 vaccination programme for Malaysians with an initial target of 70% of our population to reach herd immunity. The Malaysian Government has set aside at least RM 3 billion solely for this purpose.

3. The pricing of the Pfizer vaccine is covered by a non-disclosure agreement as each country negotiates directly with the pharmaceutical company. Suffice it to say we are satisfied with the terms and pricing that we have agreed upon. The terms we have reached protect Malaysia’s interests both financially and with regards to the safety of the vaccine.

I can categorically confirm that it is definitely less than the RM100 per dose as assumed by the State Assemblyman.

4. The State Assemblyman also claimed that we are rushing to sign deals with vaccine manufacturers. I can categorically say that this is false. We have been negotiating with vaccine manufacturers since April 2020 when we announced our Science Diplomacy strategy. We are considering all data provided by the companies we are negotiating with in order to make the best, most informed decision. This is just the first of many deals that we are considering. Negotiations are ongoing including with vaccine manufacturers from China (including the manufacturer which the State Assemblyman strongly champions). I would like to emphasise that the vaccines must be deemed safe and efficacious by the National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA) under MOH before we execute the agreements and begin the vaccination process.

It is important to note that not any one pharmaceutical company will be able to supply vaccines for the entire Malaysian population. This is why the multi-pronged approach to procure a portfolio of vaccines is significant in order to obtain enough doses to meet our herd immunity target of 70% of the population.

5. With regards to the ultra-cold supply chain required; the shipment will be handled and delivered by Pfizer directly.

As for ultra-cold storage, we have ultra-low temperature freezers in universities and research institutes in the country which can be redeployed, if necessary. Pfizer has also shown that the vaccines are stable at 2-8 degree Celsius for five days.

We are also not getting the 12.8 million doses in one shot. They will be staggered throughout the year. Our planning for storage will take the delivery schedule into consideration.

6. MOH’s efforts during the crisis have not only been domestically praised but also internationally recognised. They have been working constantly and consistently to ensure that Malaysians have among the best standards of healthcare in the world. All of us will help where we can.

We are taking a whole-of-government approach to the COVID-19 crisis. It is all hands-on deck. Every one of my Cabinet colleagues is involved in this effort to get us through this pandemic.

On the question as to why I am involved, I co-chair the JKJAV with Health Minister, YB Dato’ Seri Dr Adham Baba. MOSTI is also involved in vaccine negotiations as the ministry in charge of biotechnology. The Malaysia Genome Institute under MOSTI is producing whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis to detect mutations in the genome from COVID-19 samples.

MOSTI is also in the midst of developing a National Vaccine Roadmap. The National Institutes of Biotechnology (NIBM), Malaysia under MOSTI is collaborating with multiple foreign research institutes in vaccine development R&D as well.

I continue to welcome questions and queries on this important national endeavour.

KHAIRY JAMALUDDIN

30 NOVEMBER 2020

https://www.khairykj.com/statements/press-statement-in-reply-to-ronnie-liu

To Smash a Cracked Pot ｜Lee Yee

The national security honeymoon, the calm before the storm, is over. The sword of Damocles above our heads comes swinging down.

Against the professional recommendations of the Board of Education, the University of Hong Kong’s (HKU) governing council went with the majority’s decision and fired Benny Tai Yiu-ting, associate professor of the Faculty of Law. Certainly, no one would challenge Benny Tai’s comment that the decision to terminate his appointment was made by “an authority beyond the university through its agents”.

Three males and one female, aged between 16 and 21, were arrested on suspicion of “secession” in violation of the national security law. There was no action, only online speeches. Perhaps the few words by these teenagers are powerful enough to split a country of 1.4 billion people?

I had been pondering whether the Communists and their bootlickers would adopt the disqualification tactic or the postponement tactic in the upcoming Legislative Council election. The answer has been revealed that mass disqualifications would come first, and then a postponement may follow. Some said that the Communists are “braver” than I had predicted; but to borrow a young person’s words, which I find to be more suitable: rationality limits my imagination.

The three-part strike happened within a period of two days, putting an end to the honeymoon where the CCP had once sought dialogue, probed, soothed, and observed the global siege led by the United States. Now the CCP is addressing the US sanctions head-on while flexing its muscles by targeting Hongkongers.

This also illustrates that the attempt by the pan-democrats to navigate within the cavity of the national security law, to try to compromise on the confirmation letter to see a way out through election was an utter, complete failure. They could have followed my suggestion from a month ago, to run in the election with proud and loud opposition against the national security law, to welcome being disqualified and show the civilized world “what the CCP is plotting against Hong Kong”. That would have been more courageous. Yet some pushed their luck, and now they face the same fate of being disqualified.

CCP’s honeymoon period following the implementation of the national security law in Hong Kong was based on the assumption, by the CCP as well as other overseas observers, that Trump’s tough policy toward China was for his election campaign. Since the current projection of the election seems unfavorable to Trump, that there is hope for the Democrats to take over, and the US might change its policy toward China.

When the United States ordered the closure of the Chinese Consulate in Houston, and when the four top officials, especially Pompeo’s declaration of resistance to China, made it clear that the US ultra-cold war strategy towards China is unlikely to be reversible.

Stephen Young, a senior diplomat who had stationed in Beijing, Hong Kong, and Taipei, said that demanding other countries to close their consulates is a very drastic strategy. In the past, if a foreign diplomatic agency had a blunder, actions would usually have been taken against a person. The closures of the consulates suggest that the relationship is close to a break-up.

On July 25, the New York Times published the words of Ryan Hass, the President of the US National Security Council in the Obama era, that said, “They want to reorient the U.S.-China relationship toward an all-encompassing systemic rivalry that cannot be reversed by the outcome of the upcoming U.S. election. They believe this reorientation is needed to put the United States on a competitive footing against its 21st-century geostrategic rival.”

The two bills on Hong Kong, and the one on Xinjiang Uyghurs, were all passed almost unanimously in the US Senate and the House of Representatives. The Speaker of the House and Democrat, Pelosi, was particularly enthusiastic; left-wing media such as the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, though have been critical of Trump, have both affirmed and even encouraged Trump’s anti-China policy.

This has been a 180 from Trump’s previous declaration of “America First” when he did not hesitate to offend the United Kingdom, the European Union, and even Asia-Pacific countries. Pompeo has recently been chummy with Europe and the Asia-Pacific to ally up, and emphasized in his anti-CCP declaration the need for the free world to act together. In fact, Trump’s unilateralism has pivoted, and the allies have returned to their positions one after another, and a global siege towards China has gradually been formed.

Has China been in touch with the US Democratic Party in private to probe whether its China policy will change if it wins the general election? There is no way of knowing. Even if so, the answer is apparent.

The US policy toward China leaves no room for maneuver, and the power-hungry CCP must now hold tight onto the hastily enacted national security law till the end. The longer they hold out, who knows how many more Hong Kong officials or pro-Beijing people would be affected along the lines of Bernard Chan and his sanctioned foreign bank.

What the CCP and its Hong Kong bootlickers are doing could be described with the Chinese idiom “to smash a cracked pot”. The pot is already cracked, then just smash it. It means that there are blemishes, and mistakes that cannot be corrected or will not be correct, then why not send the helve after the hatchet.

Lu Xun said, “When the brave is angered, he draws the sword towards the stronger; when the coward is angered, he draws the sword towards the weaker.” Disqualifications coupled with the postponement, is it “braver”? Or rather, “the coward is angered”.

只睇7.1嘅表面或者單一現象，將香港年輕人判斷並報道為暴徒係太盲目，不成熟嘅做法(日文後ろ By Soko)

究竟咩嘢推到佢地咁樣嘅地步？咩嘢逼到佢地自殺，變成死士？其憤怒，絕望之根源係咩嘢，萬惡之源究竟係邊，要正視，要探討，要深思。

7月1日香港の若者たちが立法議会に突撃した行為が様々な議論を醸し出しています。
...Continue ReadingIt is too blind and immature to judge and report the young people in Hong Kong as thugs (After Japanese)

What exactly has pushed them like this? What forced them to commit suicide and become a dead man? What is the root of anger and despair? The source of all evil lies, we should face it, explore and think deeply.

July 1th, the acts that young people in Hong Kong have attacked the legislative assembly are creating various discussions.

Many Hong Kong youth and citizens are dissatisfied with the fact that multiple media in Japan wrote a mob of Hong Kong young people or mob.

What is in the root of Hong Kong Youth's anger?

According to a social worker who was at the site on July 1th, there were 1 young people who were prepared to act on death.

Democratic lawmakers are going to jail, they might be shot by gun, reconsider! I tried to stop, but," already three (suicide) Dead! I don't even know what to say! I'm ready for the assault!"

In the process of temporary occupation from the assault to the legislative assembly, there was an act of writing a slogan to beat the window, break the equipment, and criticize the government on the wall. It may probably not be the act that many democratic people wanted.

There will also be an excuse to suppress the parents of the parents, and there will also be a union that tries to take advantage of the actions of young people, and it will also be an element that will be suspected of the nature of the demonstration that has been moving on to the back of peace. No, the foreign media and international public opinion that will support you can also be away...

There was a destruction of windows, equipment, and the slogan of political criticism to the wall, but for the historical and cultural value, " don't destroy this!" There was also a side of paying money without being protected or drinking at the legislative assembly. Therefore, it does not mean that the vandalism is allowed. I'm going to tell you that there was a side like that too. The subject of vandalism was not a person but a thing consistent with things.

Various discussions are winding up on July 1th. I think I need to take a look at what is the base of Hong Kong's youth, anger, and despair, without being left alone in the video and superficial events.

June 9th 100 million demonstrations will be held. Mr. Lam, the top secretary of Hong Kong, is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the one who is the After that, I've been watching three watarai on the media for 10 days and 11 days, but I don't listen to opinion just by claiming the legitimacy of the fugitive ordinance.

In the morning of June 12th, in the tv interview, the ordinance will never withdraw, and the mother, the young man of Hong Kong, to the son," comment that I can't forgive the selfish act of my son," This is how the mother of Hong Kong was angry that the mother of Hong Kong did not deserve to name you, and in Hong Kong, the protest assembly of the unprecedented mothers was held.

When the democratic party announces a statement to rum and the government who continue to ignore the request of opinion, and the democratic party announces the statement, Mr. Lam takes out an example of the determination that has happened in the past years, and he is severely punished. Intimidated the young man.

For a series of response such as the lamb administration, citizens are disappointed, and the government who does not listen to what they say, if this ordinance has been passed to such a government, what is the security of our freedom and safety? It's going to be... fear and worries are getting more and more bloated.

The only way left was to enter the legislative assembly at the time of the second deliberation of the 12th, and to disrupt the deliberation and stop the pass, this day the police squad and the demonstrators collided hard, and the video was also The clearly captured police force was accused of violence, but the government did not follow police violence, and the people's demonstrations were defined as riot, and 32 people were arrested. My name has become a riot sin.

After that, while police assault was severely criticized by the international society, the g20 that was taken by xi jinping was imminent, and the government said that the government will stop the deliberation of the ordinance. In Japan, some media have been featured in the fact that some media have expressed the revocation of the facts, and the voices of the people and the voices of praise have risen, but the citizens of Hong Kong are not suspended = they are not withdraw, and there is a possibility that they will resume in the future. And above all, I understand the fear of the government that has not been able to stay in the middle of a hard posture that has been ignoring opinion for a long time.

And 200 million + 1 demonstrations happen. The screams of Hong Kong people have arrived in the whole world. This is what the rum administration did in the form of an apology conference as a pose, but the citizens were not able to do it, but the lamb administration did not try to listen to the citizens's demands. I did.

On July 1, the demonstrators requested an emergency meeting to the secretary of rum, but it was rejected by Mr. Lam for the reason that he was busy.

In the conflict between citizens and governments by today, the despair of young people in Hong Kong went to I, the one who chose to die (three people), or the people who were prepared to act with the death of the death. (the young man who entered the legislative assembly), what is the root of the evil that is like this, the anger and despair of this kind of anger and despair? On the essential main axis, I think that the government has been stepping on the opinion, not listening to the voice of the young people, without respect, and continuing to trampled until today.

Anger is beyond the limit, despair, and the thoughts of the young people who are going to be in the middle of the day, the thoughts of the young people who are in the middle of the day, without listening to the voice, without seeing what is behind it, the radical footage and single I think it's a very short-cut judgement to see only the events and easily put it on the mob.

What is in the back of their despair and anger, I think they need to look at what they have made them.

I'm not going to defend the destructive act, but the wrath of the young people is in the middle of the day, and there are millions of people who have gathered in peace, and when they are disbanded in peace, what will be! Citizen's opinion and democracy are just the same as the government is trampled by the government, the anger of the young people who are desperate for the adults who do not listen to the story, the feeling that explodes, and the dangers of life, but action I want to be able to understand the courage to wake up, and I want to support the future of their drawing.

There is a survey that the parent-Chinese media [economic ung] and [CLEAR NEWS] went together." while the demonstration was sustainable, the demonstrators destroyed the legislative Congress on the 1th, so i sue this Can you agree with the way?" 214,634 people answer and agree at 8 pm last night %, don't agree but 9 %, no comment Is 10 %.

It is said that the intention of the survey of the parent-Chinese media should have been a government support, and it should have been a good idea to suppress the demonstration, but the intention is edge, and the result of most citizens supporting the demonstrators. It's been embossed.

During the collision on June 12, there was a radical action of throwing bricks in a few demonstrators, but today there was no other human attack, and the demonstration was held in peace. . The vandalism in the row of July 1th was not a person, but it was against the stuff.

As A Supplement, I think that the installation of the independent investigation committee is a fair measure for both of the violence in a series of demonstrations. With a fair third party, you should check it out, democracy is also demanding it to the government. However, the government continues to refuse the installation of the independent investigation committee. For some reason it's obvious, because government and police brutality are exposed to the light of the international society.

I'm going to investigate in the agency called the existing Deputy Council, but the general council is not legally guaranteed to summon the investigation rights and witnesses to the court, and half of the members of the council committee. More than a parent. The Police are going to investigate the police, and we have to set up the independent investigation committee, and we continue to voice the opposite of the investigation at the general council, but we continue to be rejected today. Yes.

Article: @[699908786774332:274:SOKO hé quán sù xíng]Translated